Women Accessing Care at a National Network of Retail Health Clinics.

Background: Retail health clinics offer easy access and lower costs in seeking nonemergent and usually focused care. The objective of this observational study was to describe the use of retail clinic services by women at MinuteClinic at CVS, the largest network of retail clinics in the United States. Methods: The retail clinic's large database included complete national data for every in-person encounter as recorded on the same electronic health record. Virtual care and pharmacist-delivered services like COVID-19 testing were excluded from the analysis. The primary reason for the visit and the patient's age group (<15, 15-44, 45-64, ≥65 years) and self-reported sex were recorded at each encounter from the most recent 5 years (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022). Results: There were 17,969,483 encounters by women seeking care, and women ≥15 years old were more likely than men to attend the clinics. Half of all encounters (50.6%) were for non-gynecologic acute care, whereas one-third (33.6%) dealt with either an infection or the need for a vaccination. Gynecologic reasons involved 5.6% of all encounters in women ≥15 years of age. No obstetrical care was provided except for pregnancy testing with referral, acute non-obstetric needs, or guideline-recommended vaccinations. Conclusion: Women, especially of reproductive age, are more inclined than men to seek care at retail clinics. Acute care is the most common need, although requests for immunizations, infection screening and treatment, and reproductive health issues occurred often.

Diversity in Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Institutional transformation and moving diversity from the periphery to the core of excellence have increased the representation of both female and racial and ethnic minoritized populations in academic obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN). Enabling the recruitment and retention of diverse residents and faculty, measuring their contributions to the department academic and social missions, and providing a supportive environment will be important in the coming years as the changing OB/GYN workforce progresses through their careers.

Five Domains of a Conceptual Framework of Continuing Professional Development.

ABSTRACT: Continuing professional development (CPD) for health professionals involves efforts at improving health of individuals and the population through educational activities of health professionals who previously attained a recognized level of acceptable proficiency (licensure). However, those educational activities have inconsistently improved health care outcomes of patients. We suggest a conceptual change of emphasis in designing CPD to better align it with the goals of improving health care value for patients through the dynamic incorporation of five distinct domains to be included in learning activities. We identify these domains as: (1) identifying, appraising, and learning new information [New Knowledge]; (2) ongoing practicing of newly or previously acquired skills to maintain expertise [New Skills and Maintenance]; (3) sharing and transfer of new learning for the health care team which changes their practice [Teams]; (4) analyzing data to identify problems and drive change resulting in improvements in the health care system and patient outcomes [Quality Improvement]; and (5) promoting population health and prevention of disease [Prevention]. We describe how these five domains can be integrated into a comprehensive conceptual framework of CPD, supported by appropriate learning theories that align with the goals of the health care delivery system. Drawing on these distinct but interrelated areas of CPD will help organizers and directors of learning events to develop their activities to meet the goals of learners and the health care system.

Health Advocacy for Undocumented Immigrant Pregnant Patients.

The challenges of providing prenatal care for undocumented immigrants require patience. Pregnant undocumented immigrant women should receive routine prenatal care tailored to their specific needs, with an emphasis on basic needs (eg, housing, safety, food, transportation to appointment). Financial, cultural, and language barriers can impede undocumented immigrants from receiving adequate or optimal prenatal care. Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes may be more common but have not been well-quantified and cannot be compared with outcomes if care had been provided in their country of origin. An example of a community-funded clinic is described in minimizing cost and optimizing outcomes.

Effects of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) on fetal brain and cranial measurements.

BACKGROUND: The use and misuse of opioids, as well as opioid use disorder (OUD) have increased remarkably among reproductive-aged and pregnant women. As many as 25% of pregnant women who report non-medical opioid use in the past month also report concurrent alcohol use. While teratogenic effects of alcohol are well established, there are limited studies evaluating fetal intracranial effects associated with medications for OUD (MOUD) and concurrent use of MOUD and alcohol during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of MOUD, with and without concomitant alcohol use, on fetal intracranial measurements. The type of maternal MOUD therapy (methadone vs. buprenorphine) was also examined. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study among participants (n = 196) assigned into three groups (MOUD [n = 94], MOUD+Alcohol [n = 47], and unexposed controls [n = 55]). Co-exposure with either methamphetamines or cocaine were exclusionary criteria; other co-exposures were carefully characterized with prospective repeated self-report measures and biomarkers. Fetal ultrasound measurements at 18-22 weeks (2nd trimester) and 28-32 weeks (early 3rd trimester) were compared among study groups. In addition to standard morphometrics, we performed specialized intracranial measurements of caval-calvarial distance (CCD), frontal lobe width (FLW), frontal lobe length (FLL), and fronto-thalamic distance (FTD). RESULTS: Brain and cranial measurements between MOUD, with or without alcohol co-exposure, and unexposed controls were generally not significantly different in multivariable analyses. Subjects in the MOUD groups had earlier gestational age at delivery and lower birth weight and birth weight percentile compared to unexposed controls with differences driven primarily by the methadone subgroup. Significant differences in standard and specialized intracranial indices at both second and third trimester as well as differences in the change of HC percentile over time were observed in the methadone subgroup compared to controls, while no differences between buprenorphine subgroup and controls were observed for any measures. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving methadone therapy might require closer monitoring during pregnancy; however, detailed imaging of the fetal brain other than the standard measurements might not be warranted.

Over-The-Counter Drugs and Pregnancy.

The obstetric provider should ask about over-the-counter drugs, although most are low dose, used only briefly, and any harm is unlikely and more theoretic than real.

Growing Need for Primary Care Physicians Caring for Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: A rising population of cancer survivors is accompanied by a shortage of oncologists for continuity of care. This study examined the physicians who provided most of the care for cancer survivors, along with written information provided to the survivors before transfer of care. METHODS: Data were collected through the CDC-sponsored Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our analysis involved states whose respondents completed a cancer survivorship module from 2016 to 2020. Primary measures were the proportions of physician specialists who provided most of their subsequent health care and the proportions of survivors who received written summaries of their care and instructions. RESULTS: The 36,737 cancer survivor respondents came from 33 states. Most of their health care came from primary care physicians [family physicians (42.3%, 95% CI: 41.3-43.2%) and general internists (26.0%, 95% CI: 25.2-26.9%)]. When seen by primary care physicians rather than subspecialists, a lower proportion of patients recalled receiving summaries of either their cancer treatments (44.3%, 95% CI: 42.5 to 46.2 vs 50.5%, 95% CI: 49.4 to 51.7%) or follow-up instructions (69.9%, 95% CI: 68.8 to 71.0% vs 78.7%, 95%CI 77.1 to 80.2%), regardless of their cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of their cancer type, two-thirds of survivors received most of their health care from primary care physicians. Collaborative community-based care within a shared decision-making framework is essential to prioritize and individualize patients' understandings and needs in this growing population.