Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Patient Rep Outcomes ; 1(1): 13, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29757308

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined the content validity of the SF-36v2® Health Survey (SF-36v2) in patients with AL amyloidosis using qualitative interviews with physicians and patients. The study included three distinct phases of qualitative research: concept elicitation interviews among physicians, concept elicitation interviews among patients, and cognitive debriefing interviews among patients. The concept elicitation interviews focused on areas of health-related quality of life that are affected by AL amyloidosis and may be affected by treatment, while patient cognitive debriefings aimed to confirm whether the SF-36v2 instructions, recall period, items, and response choices were comprehensive and understandable to AL amyloidosis patients. RESULTS: Physicians discussed the importance of measuring physical functioning, general health, mental/emotional health, sleep, fatigue, and work impact; though they also reported that they do not routinely use a standard Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measure of health-related quality of life. Patients described social, physical, role, and emotional impacts of AL amyloidosis and various treatments. Cognitive debriefing interviews confirmed the relevance of the concepts measured by the SF-36v2 and indicated that patients found the SF-36v2 both easy to understand and complete, that the SF-36v2 instructions and items were comprehensive and understandable without change, and the response choices and recall period were appropriate for use with patients with AL amyloidosis. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the content validity of the SF-36v2 as an appropriate measure of health-related quality of life in patients with AL amyloidosis.

2.
J Pediatr Psychol ; 37(4): 414-23, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22408054

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This mixed-methods study examined the relation between caregiver-generated asthma management strategies and asthma severity in a sample of 200 children with persistent asthma (ages 5-12 years). METHODS: Caregivers were interviewed about asthma management strategies they found helpful in controlling their child's symptoms. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify household strategies. Indicators of asthma severity included lung functioning (FEV(1)) and functional severity (FSS). Child quality of life was also assessed (PQLQ). RESULTS: Six primary household strategies were identified: Reactive, Planning Ahead, Social, Emotional, Avoiding Triggers, and Cleaning. In general, strategies offered by caregivers did not differ by socioeconomic status. Caregivers who endorsed Avoiding Triggers as effective strategies had children with better lung functioning. Caregivers who endorsed Planning Ahead or Emotional strategies had children with better asthma-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: These household strategies hold promise for reducing pediatric asthma symptoms and improving child quality of life.


Subject(s)
Asthma/drug therapy , Caregivers/psychology , Health Behavior , Quality of Life/psychology , Asthma/physiopathology , Asthma/psychology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Helping Behavior , Humans , Male , Respiratory Function Tests , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL