Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(8): 1347-50, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25075556

ABSTRACT

In February 2014, porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) was identified in the United States. We developed a PDCoV real-time reverse transcription PCR that identified PDCoV in 30% of samples tested. Four additional PDCoV genomes from the United States were sequenced; these had ≈99%-100% nt similarity to the other US PDCoV strains.


Subject(s)
Coronaviridae Infections/diagnosis , Coronaviridae Infections/virology , Coronaviridae/classification , Coronaviridae/genetics , Genome, Viral , Phylogeny , Animals , Genetic Variation , Open Reading Frames , Swine
2.
J Health Commun ; 17(9): 1081-98, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22765277

ABSTRACT

The distinction between prevention and detection behaviors provides a useful guideline for appropriately framing health messages in terms of gains or losses. However, this guideline assumes that everyone perceives the outcomes associated with a behavior in a consistent manner, as prevention or detection. Individuals' perceptions of a behavior vary, and so the effects of framed messages may be optimized by considering individuals' perceptions rather than the prevention or detection function of the behavior. The authors tested this message-framing paradigm in a secondary analysis of data from a trial evaluating gain-framed smoking cessation counseling delivered through a state quitline (Toll et al., 2010 ). Smokers (N = 2,032) who called a state quitline received either gain-framed or standard care messages. Smokers' beliefs about the positive consequences of stopping smoking (outcome expectancies) were evaluated at baseline. Smoking status and self-efficacy were assessed at 3 months. Outcome expectancies moderated the framing effects among men but not among women. Men in the gain-framed counseling condition who had positive outcome expectancies were more likely to quit and had more confidence in their ability to quit or to remain abstinent than men who were uncertain of the positive outcome of smoking cessation. Among men, self-efficacy mediated the moderated framing effects of the intervention on quit status. These findings suggest that it may be useful to consider sex and individual differences in outcome expectancies when delivering gain-framed smoking cessation messages in the context of a state quitline.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Counseling , Hotlines , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking Prevention , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York , Program Evaluation , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...