Elimination of mouse allergens in the working environment: assessment of individually ventilated cage systems and ventilated cabinets in the containment of mouse allergens.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory animal allergy is an important occupational disease that is preventable by reduction of exposure to mammalian allergens. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the efficacy of safety equipment in containing mouse urinary protein (MUP)--specifically, individually ventilated cage (IVC) systems and class I--type and class II ventilated cabinets. METHODS: Six IVC systems (which are used to house rodents) were operated at positive and negative pressure. Air samples (2 L/min) were collected at the cage front, cage back, air inlet, and air outlet, and the MUP was quantified by immunoassay. The background MUP of the IVC study room was compared with that of rooms where mice were housed conventionally or in isolators. Class I--type cabinets (n = 2) were tested during the disposal of soiled litter. Air samples were positioned on and behind the operator and inside the cabinet (n = 2). Personal samples were collected while scientific procedures were performed in a class II cabinet and in the open. RESULTS: All of the IVC systems contained MUP effectively (>250-fold) when operated at negative pressure. At positive pressure, the "unsealed" IVC racks leaked MUP (1- to 25-fold reduction) but the "sealed" IVC system did not. Class I--type cabinets reduced (10-fold) but did not eliminate exposure during "cleaning out." No MUP was detected when procedures were performed in class II cabinets (protection factor, >10-fold). CONCLUSION: Safety equipment can substantially reduce exposure to mouse allergen. Allergen exposure in holding rooms will be minimized if mice are housed in IVC systems operated at negative pressure or in "sealed" IVC systems at positive pressure. Respiratory protection should be used whenever "unsealed" IVC systems are operated at positive pressure or during "cleaning out" in class I--type cabinets.

Effect of food on the bioavailability of stavudine in subjects with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

A randomized, three-way crossover study was carried out to determine the effects of food ingestion on the pharmacokinetics of stavudine (d4T). Fifteen subjects with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and CD4(+) cell counts of >/=200/microliter received 70 mg of d4T in a fasting state or 1 h before or 5 min after a standardized high-fat breakfast. A 7- to 15-day washout period was included between treatments. Blood and urine were collected before and for 10 h after dosing, and plasma and urine d4T concentrations were determined with a validated radioimmunoassay. Plasma drug concentration-time data were analyzed with a noncompartmental model. The mean maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and the time to Cmax (Tmax) for administration of d4T after a meal were significantly lower and longer (P = 0.0001 for both measures) than those observed in the fasting state, although the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) was not significantly different. Neither of these parameters was significantly altered when d4T was taken 1 h before a meal. The bioavailability of d4T taken after a meal was 95% of that observed in the fasting state, and it was 97% when d4T was administered before a meal (P > 0.05 for both comparisons with the fasting state). The results of this study indicate that (i) ingestion of food does not affect the bioavailability of d4T and that patients with HIV infection can take it without regard to meals, and (ii) absorption is essentially complete within 1 h when d4T is administered in the fasted state.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.

The effect of hepatic impairment on the clinical pharmacology of the angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist irbesartan was assessed by comparing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in 10 patients with hepatic cirrhosis with a matched group of 10 healthy volunteers. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan, 300 mg taken orally once daily, were evaluated after single- and multiple-dose (7 consecutive days) administration to normotensive subjects in an open-label, multiple-dose, parallel group study. Pharmacokinetic data obtained after administration of single and multiple doses of irbesartan showed no significant difference between the two groups in time to maximum observed plasma concentration of drug (tmax), half-life (t1/2), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), apparent oral clearance (Cl(t)/F), renal clearance (Cl(r)), and accumulation index (AI). Steady-state levels of irbesartan were reached within 3 days in both treatment groups. After irbesartan administration on day 1, mean increases from baseline in plasma AII levels and plasma renin activity (PRA) were greater in the group with cirrhosis than in the control group. On day 7, mean increases from baseline in PRA were greater in the control group than in the group with cirrhosis. No discontinuations or serious adverse events occurred during the study. The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan after repeated oral administration were not significantly affected in patients with mild-to-moderate cirrhosis of the liver. No dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with hepatic insufficiency.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation during coadministration of nefazodone and propranolol in healthy men.

Potential interactions between nefazodone (200 mg every 12 hours) and propranolol (40 mg every 12 hours) were assessed in 18 healthy male volunteers in an open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study. The nature, frequency, and severity of adverse events during coadministration of nefazodone and propranolol were similar to those observed with either treatment alone. There were no clinically significant effects on vital signs, electrocardiographic results, or laboratory parameters. With coadministration, the maximum peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC tau) of propranolol decreased 29% and 14%, respectively; Cmax and AUC tau of 4-hydroxy-propranolol decreased 15% and 21%, respectively. Despite decreased plasma concentrations of the beta-antagonists, the reduction in exercise-induced tachycardia and post-exercise double product was slightly greater with coadministration than with propranolol alone. Administration of nefazodone alone did not significantly affect either pharmacologic parameter. The pharmacokinetics of nefazodone and its metabolites were largely unaffected during coadministration. Coadministration of propranolol and nefazodone results in modest pharmacokinetic inequivalencies, but no clinically significant alterations of the pharmacodynamics of propranolol.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of warfarin and nefazodone coadministration in healthy subjects.

Nefazodone, an antidepressant with serotonin and norepinephrine receptor modulating activity, is highly protein bound and eliminated by oxidative metabolism. This study evaluated the potential for clinically significant drug interactions with warfarin and nefazodone coadministration. Eighteen subjects received warfarin daily for 14 days, achieving steady-state warfarin concentrations and a stable prothrombin ratio. Nefazodone 200 mg every 12 hours (n = 12) or placebo every 12 hours (n = 6) was then added to the daily warfarin dose for the next 7 days in a double-blind, randomized design. No serious or unexpected adverse events or events suggestive of abnormal bleeding occurred during coadministration. The addition of nefazodone had no effect on the unbound fraction of total warfarin in plasma or on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of R-warfarin based on within-subject or comparison to placebo-treated subjects. The steady-state AUCTAU over the dosing interval and Cmax of S-warfarin decreased by 12%; however, this change is clinically insignificant because the prothrombin ratio and bleeding time remained unchanged. The steady-state minimum concentrations for nefazodone and metabolites, achieved on coadministration day 3, were typical of healthy men treated with this nefazodone dosage. In conclusion, warfarin and nefazodone coadministration was safe and well-tolerated with no clinically significant interactions.