Exercise does not cause post-exertional malaise in Veterans with Gulf War Illness: A randomized, controlled, dose-response, crossover study.

Chronic multisymptom illnesses (CMI) such as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Long-COVID, and Gulf War Illness (GWI) are associated with an elevated risk of post-exertional malaise (PEM), an acute exacerbation of symptoms and other related outcomes following exercise. These individuals may benefit from personalized exercise prescriptions which prioritize risk minimization, necessitating a better understanding of dose-response effects of exercise intensity on PEM. METHODS: Veterans with GWI (n = 40) completed a randomized controlled crossover experiment comparing 20 min of seated rest to light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity cycling conditions over four separate study visits. Symptoms, pain sensitivity, cognitive performance, inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and plasma cytokines) were measured before and within 1 h after exercise and seated rest. Physical activity behavior was measured ≥ 7 days following each study visit via actigraphy. Linear mixed effects regression models tested the central hypothesis that higher intensity exercise would elicit greater exacerbation of negative outcomes, as indicated by a significant condition-by-time interaction for symptom, pain sensitivity, cognitive performance, and inflammatory marker models and a significant main effect of condition for physical activity models. RESULTS: Significant condition-by-time interactions were not observed for primary or secondary measures of symptoms, pain sensitivity, cognitive performance, and a majority of inflammatory markers. Similarly, a significant effect of condition was not observed for primary or secondary measures of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Undesirable effects such as symptom exacerbation were observed for some participants, but the group-level risk of PEM following light-, moderate-, or vigorous-intensity exercise was no greater than seated rest. These findings challenge several prior views about PEM and lend support to a broader body of literature showing that the benefits of exercise outweigh the risks.

Elevated Perceived Exertion in People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia: A Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM) are two debilitating illnesses primarily characterized by chronic symptoms of fatigue and musculoskeletal pain, respectively. Some investigators have observed an elevated sense of effort in these patient groups; however, this effect has not been substantiated via quantitative review. As such, we conducted a meta-analysis of RPE responses to aerobic exercise in ME/CFS and FM compared with healthy adults. METHODS: Case-control studies involving adults with ME/CFS or FM that measured RPE and heart rate responses to acute aerobic exercise were included. Data sources included PubMed, Scopus/Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar. Risk of bias was assessed by evaluating each study's description of participant characteristics, matching procedures, and administration of RPE scales. Hedges' d effect sizes for RPE were calculated and aggregated using random-effects models, and potential moderators were explored with meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-one effects were extracted from 37 studies involving 1016 patients and 686 healthy controls. We observed a large (Hedges' d = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.62-1.08) effect indicating higher RPE in patients than controls. The mean effect size was significantly moderated (P < 0.001, R = 0.38) by whether RPE data were analyzed at a peak or submaximal intensity (b = 0.60, z = 4.6, P < 0.001) and the type of patient group that was studied (b = 0.25, z = 2.08, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: People with ME/CFS and FM perceive aerobic exercise as more effortful than healthy adults, but the exact causes are unclear. The large magnitude of this effect merits further exploration of underlying mechanisms that could provide insight into the pathophysiology of ME/CFS and FM or the broader debate about the nature of central and/or peripheral signals that influence RPE.