ABSTRACT
AIM: Analysis of newborn hearing screening (NBS) outcomes and proposing a modified strategy for better performance of NBS in developing world. DESIGN: Descriptive (retrospective and prospective) study. METHODS: A total of 8412 newborns/neonates were subjected to risk factor assessment followed by a set of subjective (behavioral audiometry: BoA) and objective (OAE: otoacoustic emissions, ABR: auditory brainstem-evoked responses) hearing-screening in different combinations. DPOAE (primary objective tool) was undertaken in 2565 cases. Predictive value of risk factors on deafness was statistically analysed along with affectivity of objective, subjective and questionnaire-based screening tools. RESULTS: Amongst 8412 babies, 45.5% were 'at risk' (major 36.41%, minor 9.17%). The OAE was abnormal in 299 cases (11.6% of 2565 & 3.5% in 8412). The abnormal OAE rate in prospective cases was 3.5% while in retrospective cases that underwent initial screening with BoA was 41%. A significant correlation was seen with consanguinity, high blood pressure, NICU stay>5 days, low birth weight, neonatal jaundice, delayed birth cry, pre-mature status, birth asphyxia and maternal excessive vomiting, while regression models of OAE outcome (sensitivity 99%, accuracy 89%) revealed highest predictive value for the initial 3 factors. BoA-screening revealed a sensitivity of 72.6%, and negative predictive value of 42.4%. Also a perfect correlation was evident between OAE-ABR, OAE-BoA and ABR-BoA. CONCLUSION: A subjective NBS screening through questionnaire-based-risk-assessment and modified-BoA followed by selective referral for objective assessment is more practical and focussed approach for poor resourced countries that is likely to screen a larger population.
