The Effects of UVB and Vitamin D on Decreasing Risk of Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Review of the Epidemiology, Clinical Trials, and Mechanisms.

The solar ultraviolet B-vitamin D-cancer hypothesis was first suggested in 1980 based on a geographical ecological study. Since then, several ecological and observational studies, as well as researches of mechanisms have supported the hypothesis. Also, the association between vitamin D condition and cancer risk has been assessed in a number of epidemiologic studies, while data from interventional studies remain scant. In regard of cancer locations, the body of evidence is most substantial for colorectal cancer, for which support comes from studies of 25(OH)D, vitamin D intake, and region of residence in a sunny weather. Collectively evidence demonstrates that vitamin D has a potent and beneficial effect at antagonizing and blocking several mitogenic mechanisms related to tumorigenesis. Taken together with the epidemiological studies and limited clinical trials, individuals may need to consider elevating 25(OH)D levels via sun exposure and/or vitamin D supplementation to decrease risk of colorectal cancer, in addition to standard care, treat cancer.

Comparing Efficacy of Preoperative neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery versus Surgery Alone in Patients with Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recent researches have led to find strategies to prevent relapse and to improve survival for gastric cancer patients, including preoperative neo-adjuvant approaches. However, the efficacy of some neo-adjuvant regimens including 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel have been less investigated. The present study evaluated the outcome and mid-term survival of patients with gastric cancer who undergoing this regimen. METHODS: In a randomized double-blinded controlled trial performed at the Firoozgar hospital in Tehran in 2011-12, 61 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (32 to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) before surgery and 27 to surgery alone). The present study tried to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regarding improvement of mid-term survival, complications, and R0 resection status. RESULTS: The two groups were matched in terms of gender, mean age, cancer location, and TNM staging. However, R0 resection in the former group was 85.7%; while this indicator in the isolated surgery group was significantly lower (61.5%). Regarding WHO performance, no significant difference was observed across the two groups. Patients in neo-adjuvant chemotherapy group were followed for mean follow-up time 10.32 months and those who categorized in isolated surgery group were followed for mean follow-up time 10.88 months. Mid-term mortality rate in the two groups was 14.3% and 15.4%, respectively (p = 0.866). In this regard, 3-, 6-, and 9-month survival rate in neo-adjuvant chemotherapy group was 96.4%, 89.3%, and 85.7%, respectively. These survival rates in the surgery group were 92.3%, 88.5%, and 84.6%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that among all study variables, only R0 resection status could predict mid-term mortality. CONCLUSION: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery compare to surgery alone more improve R0 resection status, but mid-term survival rate is similar in the two regiments. R0 resection status can effectively predict appropriate mid-term survival in undertreated patients.

Hydroxyurea therapy in 49 patients with major beta-thalassemia.

Major thalassemia is one of the most common hemoglobinopathies in many Asian countries including Iran. Pharmacologic agents such as hydroxyurea have been known to enhance the production of fetal hemoglobin, and also an increase in total hemoglobin level has been repeatedly reported during hydroxyurea treatment in patients with sickle cell disease and in several patients with intermediate beta-thalassemia. We evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of hydroxyurea in major beta-thalassemic patients. Forty-nine beta-thalassemic patients enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up time was 60 months. The mean dose of hydroxyurea was 10 mg/kg per day (8-15 mg/kg). Before starting hydroxyurea, all patients underwent routine biochemical laboratory tests. Patients with low platelet count (<100,000/mm3), neutropenia (polymorphonuclear neutrophil<1,200/mm3), pregnancy, and on interferon treatment were excluded.Twenty-eight out of 49 enrolled patients were females with the mean age of 18.38 years (10-40 years). The mean packed red cell transfusions during one year before starting of hydroxyurea was 22.75 units which decreased to 6.02 units after treatment (P<0.01). The mean ferritin level during the first period was 2751.44 ng/mL, but decreased to 1594.20 ng/mL after one year of hydroxyurea therapy (P<0.001).We observed a substantial and persistent increase in hemoglobin level and a significant decrease in blood transfusion. Hydroxyurea treatment was well-tolerated and it did not cause any hematopoietic suppression except in one patient who developed transient thrombocytopenia which resolved after short period of hydroxyurea cessation. We did not encounter any malignancies including leukemia in the five-year follow-up.