Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Front Psychol ; 12: 697300, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34354641

ABSTRACT

Individuals that attend cancer genetic counseling may experience test-related psychosocial problems that deserve clinical attention. In order to provide a reliable and valid first-line screening tool for these issues, Eijzenga and coworkers developed the Psychosocial Aspects of Hereditary Cancer (PAHC) questionnaire. The aim of this work was to develop an Italian adaptation of the PAHC (I-PACH). This prospective multicenter observational study included three stages: (1) development of a provisional version of the I-PAHC; (2) pilot studies aimed at testing item readability and revising the questionnaire; and (3) a main study aimed at testing the reliability and validity of the final version of the I-PAHC with the administration of a battery comprising measures of depression, anxiety, worry, stress, and life problems to 271 counselees from four cancer genetic clinics. Adapting the original PAHC to the Italian context involved adding two further domains and expanding the emotions domain to include positive emotions. While most of the items were found to be easy to understand and score, some required revision to improve comprehensibility; others were considered irrelevant or redundant and therefore deleted. The final version showed adequate reliability and validity. The I-PAHC provides comprehensive content coverage of cancer genetic-specific psychosocial problems, is well accepted by counselees, and can be considered a sound assessment tool for psychosocial issues related to cancer genetic counseling and risk assessment in Italy.

2.
Genes (Basel) ; 12(5)2021 04 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33919281

ABSTRACT

The most common breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes beyond BRCA1/2 are ATM and CHEK2. For the purpose of exploring the clinicopathologic characteristics of BC developed by ATM or CHEK2 mutation carriers, we reviewed the archive of our Family Cancer Clinic. Since 2018, 1185 multi-gene panel tests have been performed. Nineteen ATM and 17 CHEK2 mutation carriers affected by 46 different BCs were identified. A high rate of bilateral tumors was observed in ATM (26.3%) and CHEK2 mutation carriers (41.2%). While 64.3% of CHEK2 tumors were luminal A-like, 56.2% of ATM tumors were luminal B-like/HER2-negative. Moreover, 21.4% of CHEK2-related invasive tumors showed a lobular histotype. About a quarter of all ATM-related BCs and a third of CHEK2 BCs were in situ carcinomas and more than half of ATM and CHEK2-related BCs were diagnosed at stage I-II. Finally, 63.2% of ATM mutation carriers and 64.7% of CHEK2 mutation carriers presented a positive BC family history. The biological and clinical characteristics of ATM and CHEK2-related tumors may help improve diagnosis, prognostication and targeted therapeutic approaches. Contralateral mastectomy should be considered and discussed with ATM and CHEK2 mutation carriers at the first diagnosis of BC.


Subject(s)
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Checkpoint Kinase 2/genetics , Germ-Line Mutation , Heterozygote , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Gene Frequency , Humans , Phenotype
4.
Cancer Med ; 9(7): 2579-2589, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32045136

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Up to 10% of individuals with breast cancer (BC) belong to families with hereditary syndromes. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to identify individuals/families at high-hereditary risk for BC and offer dedicated surveillance programs according to different risks. METHODS: The instrument consisted of a primary questionnaire collecting history of BC and ovarian cancer (OC). This questionnaire was applied to women enrolled in the Emilia-Romagna Breast Cancer Screening Program. General practitioners (GPs) and specialists could propose the same questionnaire too. Women with a score of ≥ 2, were invited to complete an oncogenetic counseling. According to the Tyrer-Cuzick evaluation, women considered at high risk were invited to involve the most representative alive individual of the family affected with BC/OC for BRCA1/2 genetic testing. RESULTS: Since January 2012 and December 2016, 660 040 women were evaluated by the regional screening program, of which 22 289 (3.5%) were invited to the Spoke evaluation, but only 5615 accepted (25.2%). Totally, also considering women sent by GPs and specialists, 11 667 were assessed and 5554 were sent to the Hub evaluation. Finally, 2342 (42.8%) women fulfilled the criteria for genetic testing, and 544 (23.2%) resulted BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first regional population-based multistep model that is aimed to identify individuals with BRCA1/2 mutations and to offer an intensive surveillance program for hereditary-high risk women. This tool is feasible and effective, even if more efforts must be performed to increase the acceptance of multiple assessments by the study population.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing/methods , Mutation , Adult , Aged , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prognosis
5.
Cancers (Basel) ; 11(2)2019 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30736435

ABSTRACT

The identification of BRCA mutations plays a crucial role in the management of hereditary cancer prevention and treatment. Nonetheless, BRCA-testing in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients is not universally introduced in clinical practice. A retrospective analysis was conducted, firstly, to evaluate the rate of BRCA-positive families among those presenting a family history of PC besides breast and/or ovarian cancer. Secondly, the relationship between BRCA pathogenic variants and PC risk was evaluated. Finally, the characteristics of PC developed in BRCA families were described. Among 5143 family trees reporting breast and/or ovarian cancer cases, 392 showed a family history of PC. A total of 35 families (24.5% selected by the Modena Criteria and 21.3% by the NCCN Criteria) were positive to BRCA testing. Among the BRCA1 mutations, 36.8% were found within a region defined by c.3239⁻c.3917, whilst 43.7% of BRCA2 mutations were located within c.7180⁻c.8248. This study confirmed that an increase in the rate of positive tests in families with PC when associated to breast and/or ovarian tumors. Moreover, this analysis indicated two possible Pancreatic Cancer Cluster Regions that should be verified in future research. Finally, PC in families with breast and/or ovarian cancer history, particularly in BRCA families, were diagnosed at younger age and showed better one-year overall survival.

7.
Oncotarget ; 8(6): 9144-9154, 2017 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27880720

ABSTRACT

Reproductive history and exogenous hormonal exposures are acknowledged risk factors for breast cancer in the general population. In women at increased breast cancer risk for genetic predisposition or positive family history, data regarding these risk factors are limited or conflicting, and recommendations for these categories are unclear. We evaluated the characteristics of reproductive life in 2522 women at increased genetic or familial breast cancer risk attending our Family Cancer Center. Breast cancers in BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to be hormone receptor negative, diagnosed at 35 years or before and multiple during the lifetime than tumors in women at increased familial risk, while the distribution of invasive cancers and HER2 positive tumors was similar in the different risk groups. At least one full-term pregnancy (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12-0.58; p = 0.001), breastfeeding either less (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.66; p = 0.005) or more (HR 0.25; 95% IC 0.08-0.82; p = 0.022) than one year and late age at menopause (HR 0.10; 95% CI 0.01-0.82; p = 0.033) showed to be protective factors in BRCA mutation carriers, while in women at increased familial risk early age at first full-term pregnancy (HR 0.62; 95% IC 0.38-0.99; p = 0.048) and late menarche (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.42-0.85; p = 0.004) showed to be the main protective factors. Finally, for the entire population, combined hormonal contraceptives demonstrated to do not increase breast cancer risk. The results of our study suggest that women at high familial risk and mutation carries develop tumors with different clinical-pathological characteristics and, consequently, are influenced by different protective and risk factors.


Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Fertility , Mutation , Reproductive Health , Adult , Aged , Breast Feeding , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Chi-Square Distribution , Contraceptives, Oral, Sequential/adverse effects , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heredity , Humans , Italy , Menarche , Menopause , Middle Aged , Parity , Pedigree , Phenotype , Pregnancy , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Time Factors
8.
J Genet Couns ; 25(2): 405-11, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26354337

ABSTRACT

As the impact of breast cancer (BC) risk assessment in asymptomatic women with a family history of BC had never been explored in Italy, we performed a study on a retrospective series of women who had undergone BC risk assessment. To this aim, a semi-structured telephone interview was administered to 82 women. Most participants considered the information received as clear (96.2 %) and helpful (76.8 %). Thirty-eight (46.3 %) stated that their perceived risk of BC had changed after the counseling: for 40.2 % it had decreased, for 6.1 % increased; however, women highly overestimating their risk at the baseline (≥ 4-fold) failed to show improvements in risk perception accuracy. Sixty-six women (80.5 %) stated they had followed the recommended surveillance, while 19.5 % had not, mainly due to difficulties in arranging examinations. Most women (89.0 %) had shared the information with their relatives, with 57.3 % reporting other family members had undertaken the recommended surveillance. BC risk assessment was associated with high rates of satisfaction and had a favorable impact on risk perception in a subgroup of women. The impact on surveillance adhesion extended to relatives. Organized programs for identification and surveillance may help identify a larger fraction of at-risk women and overcome the reported difficulties in arranging surveillance.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Risk Assessment , Adult , Female , Humans , Italy , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Retrospective Studies
9.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 341723, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26075229

ABSTRACT

More than one-fifth of ovarian tumors have hereditary susceptibility and, in about 65-85% of these cases, the genetic abnormality is a germline mutation in BRCA genes. Nevertheless, several other suppressor genes and oncogenes have been associated with hereditary ovarian cancers, including the mismatch repair (MMR) genes in Lynch syndrome, the tumor suppressor gene, TP53, in the Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and several other genes involved in the double-strand breaks repair system, such as CHEK2, RAD51, BRIP1, and PALB2. The study of genetic discriminators and deregulated pathways involved in hereditary ovarian syndromes is relevant for the future development of molecular diagnostic strategies and targeted therapeutic approaches. The recent development and implementation of next-generation sequencing technologies have provided the opportunity to simultaneously analyze multiple cancer susceptibility genes, reduce the delay and costs, and optimize the molecular diagnosis of hereditary tumors. Particularly, the identification of mutations in ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in healthy women may result in a more personalized cancer risk management with tailored clinical and radiological surveillance, chemopreventive approaches, and/or prophylactic surgeries. On the other hand, for ovarian cancer patients, the identification of mutations may provide potential targets for biologic agents and guide treatment decision-making.


Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein , BRCA2 Protein , DNA Mismatch Repair , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Ovarian Neoplasms , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA1 Protein/metabolism , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/therapy , Female , Humans , Li-Fraumeni Syndrome/genetics , Li-Fraumeni Syndrome/metabolism , Li-Fraumeni Syndrome/pathology , Li-Fraumeni Syndrome/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy
10.
Breast J ; 19(1): 10-21, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252601

ABSTRACT

Chemoprevention for women at risk for breast cancer has been shown to be effective, but in actual practice, women's uptake of chemoprevention has been poor. We explored factors that influence acceptability, adherence, and dropout in the International Breast (Prevention) Intervention Study during our first 3 years of activity at the Modena Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center. We evaluated socio-demographic characteristics, health status, adherence, and side effect intensity. Semi-structured interviews analyzed reasons for accepting/refusing/stopping the trial. A total of 471 postmenopausal women were invited to participate, of which 319 declined to participate (68%), 137 accepted to participate (29%), and 15 participants did not make a final decision (3%). Breast cancer-related worries and trust in our preventive and surveillance programs were the most frequent reasons for accepting. Side effect-related worry was the most frequent reason for refusing. General practitioners' and family members' opinions played an important role in the decision-making process. Adherence significantly decreased after a 12-month follow-up, but it remained unchanged after 24- and 36-month follow-ups. Mild/moderate side effects reported by women did not change after 12 months of treatment. Forty percent of women withdrew from the study due to complaints of side effects. We concluded that chemoprevention trials are difficult medical experiments and that the process of deciding about whether or not to participate is based mainly on beliefs and values. This study has important clinical implications. During counselling with prospective participants, it is important to emphasize the potential benefits and to promote an informed choice. How participants make decisions, their belief systems, and their perception of risk are all factors that should be investigated in future research.


Subject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Medication Adherence , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Treatment Refusal , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Anastrozole , Anticarcinogenic Agents/adverse effects , Arthralgia/chemically induced , Chi-Square Distribution , Decision Making , Double-Blind Method , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hot Flashes/chemically induced , Humans , Italy , Middle Aged , Nitriles/adverse effects , Patient Dropouts , Triazoles/adverse effects , Vaginal Diseases/chemically induced
11.
Prenat Diagn ; 26(12): 1156-9, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17009341

ABSTRACT

Angelman Syndrome (AS), characterized by mental retardation, absence of speech, seizures and motor dysfunction, is caused by genetic defects leading to loss of expression of the maternal copy of the chromosome 15q11-13 imprinted region. Most cases are sporadic, being caused by de novo deletion of maternal chromosome 15q11-13 (75%) or by paternal uniparental disomy (3-4%). Familial cases can occur, due to mutations in the UBE3A gene or in the imprinting center. We describe the case of a pregnant woman having two nephews with AS caused by a UBE3A mutation; lack of communication within the family led the woman to be completely unaware of the risk of disease recurrence until 15 weeks of gestation. UBE3A genetic testing revealed she carried the familial mutation 892-893delCT. Prenatal diagnosis was performed on amniotic fluid and demonstrated that the fetus had inherited the mutation. The unexpected diagnosis and the subsequent termination of the pregnancy caused the woman to undergo acute psychological distress showing relevant psychopathological symptoms. Nevertheless, at 2-year follow-up, adverse consequences were minimized, and the couple was planning a new pregnancy. Factors affecting the psychological outcome of abortion and the role of psychological support in reducing the risk of long-term unfavorable consequences are discussed.


Subject(s)
Angelman Syndrome/genetics , Genetic Counseling , Prenatal Diagnosis/psychology , Stress, Psychological , Abortion, Induced/psychology , Adult , Angelman Syndrome/diagnosis , Family , Female , Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Fetal Diseases/genetics , Heterozygote , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mutation , Pedigree , Pregnancy , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/genetics
12.
Thromb Haemost ; 96(3): 348-55, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16953278

ABSTRACT

We investigated the psychological impact of testing for the presence of thrombophilic alterations. The enrolled subjects received counseling from a physician before blood sampling and after receiving results, with a view to provide clear information about the aim of thrombophilia screening (TS). Participants were requested to complete a pre-test questionnaire during this interview and a post-test questionnaire 20 days after receiving the TS results. One hundred ninety-seven subjects completed the pretest questionnaire and 140/197 (71.1%) returned the post-test one. The TS results were altered in 36 (25.7%, R506Q mutation n = 19; G20210A mutation n = 9; antithrombin deficiency n = 1; LAC phenomenon n = 4; hyperhomocysteinemia n = 3) and normal in 104 subjects. We assessed: perceived health status (PHS), state of anxiety, health fears, depressive reactions, moods, perceived well-being, and perceived daily-life stress. For both groups, both at pre- and post-test, none of the psychological variable scores showed significant worsening, regardless of whether TS resulted altered or normal. Anxiety significantly (p < or = 0.05) decreased at post-test in the altered group and a non-significant improvement in PHS after TS result communication was recorded in both groups. Age was an important factor in mediating psychological impact. In conclusion, diagnosis of thrombophilic alterations seems to be well accepted in the short term and TS should not be discouraged for potential adverse psychological effects. However, the psychological impact over a longer period of receiving altered results needs to be further investigated. The relationship between absence of adverse psychological reactions and quality of counseling program provided before and after TS should also be investigated.


Subject(s)
Mutation , Thrombophilia/genetics , Thrombophilia/psychology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety , Female , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Genetic Testing/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...