Acute intraperitoneal rupture of hydatid cysts of the liver: Case series.

ABSTRACT: Hydatid cyst is a parasitic infection caused mainly by Echinococcus granulosus, which is generally considered benign. However, the hepatic hydatid cyst rupture in the abdominal cavity is a life-threatening incident that requires urgent and multidisciplinary management (emergency physicians, radiologists, anesthetists, and surgeons). This study describes clinical and paraclinical liver hydatid cyst rupture in the peritoneal cavity and details the appropriate treatment.A retrospective review of clinical records of patients hospitalized in Jendouba Hospital for liver hydatid cyst was performed over 8 years, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2019. Fifteen cases of liver hydatid cyst complicated with acute rupture into the abdominal cavity were collected out of 625 hydatid liver cysts. All patients underwent emergency laparotomy allowing conservative unroofing procedure associated with peritoneal lavage and external drainage combined with necessary intensive care measures. Clinical features, therapeutic procedures' details as well as postoperative outcomes are reported. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows version 20.There were 9 men and 6 women. Patients' age ranged from 14 to 59 years, with an average of 38 years. Two patients were admitted with abdominal trauma. Acute abdominal pain was the most common complaint. Only 1 patient had an anaphylactic shock. Abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography scan showed discontinuous cyst wall associated to intraperitoneal fluid in all cases. Intraoperatively, the intraperitoneal effusion was clear in 13 cases and purulent in 2. All patients underwent unroofing procedures associated with intra-operative peritoneal lavage and external drainage. The mean hospital stay was 6.11 days, and the mean follow-up was 19 months. No case of recurrence was reported among the patients.In endemic areas, rupture of a hepatic hydatid cyst in the abdominal cavity should be considered in every case of acute abdominal pain, especially if associated with anaphylaxis signs. Early management starting in the emergency room is needed to ensure good outcome.

De Garengeot hernia doubly complicated: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: A strangulated De Garengeot's hernia with appendicitis is an extremely rare surgical presentation. Therefore, the diagnosis is challenging, and there are no recommendations regarding a specific surgical approach. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the case of a 56-year-old woman with a De Garengeot's hernia doubly complicated: strangulated and with appendicitis in the hernia sac. The diagnosis was made intraoperatively, and it was managed fully through a single inguinal incision. No postoperative complication was presented, and the patient was discharged 48 h after. DISCUSSION: The clinical presentation of this sub-type of hernia is non-specific. Precise knowledge of the hernia sac content preoperatively is not mandatory, and it should not delay prompt emergency surgery. As long as there are no local signs of complicated appendicitis, a single inguinal incision may be sufficient to perform appendectomy and hernia repair. In the event of complicated appendicitis, an exploratory of the abdominal cavity is mandatory, and hybrid approaches are recommended. For an experienced surgeon, the laparoscopic approach (TAPP), including the treatment of the two pathologies and the exploration of the peritoneal cavity, represents the surgical technique of choice. CONCLUSION: De Garengeot's strangulated hernia with appendicitis is an exceedingly rare double surgical emergency. When uncomplicated appendicitis, a single inguinal incision is sufficient to treat both appendicitis and abdominal wall defect. Hernia reduction, which young surgeons in the emergency room commonly attempt, should be abolished.

The deceitful diagnosis of gallbladder volvulus: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: The gallbladder volvulus is a rare but life-threatening condition characterized by an axial torsion of the gallbladder along the cystic pedicle, causing gallbladder ischemia and necrosis. This paper aims to present and discuss a rare case of gallbladder volvulus. This case report has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria 2020 [1]. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 90-year-old female patient who presented to the emergency room with sharp right upper abdominal quadrant pain of acute onset associated with vomiting, evolving for the last 12 h. She had no fever nor jaundice. Her body mass index (BMI) was 22. She had kyphosis, and scoliosis. Physical examination found tenderness with a palpable mass in the right upper abdominal quadrant. Laboratory test results showed leukocytosis at 11600 /mL and a high C-reactive protein rate at 40 mg/L revealed acute calculous cholecystitis features. However, emergency laparotomy was performed and discovered a gallbladder volvulus. A detorsion and cholecystectomy were performed with a good outcome. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder volvulus is difficult due to its misleading clinical presentation mimicking acute cholecystitis. The presence of the three highly suggestive triad clinical signs should encourage the radiologist to search for a gallbladder with a horizontal orientation and located outside its anatomical fossa connected to the liver by a conical structure corresponding to the twisted pedicle in ultrasonography. Unlike ordinary acute cholecystitis, which may sometimes tolerate an initial conservative medical treatment, gallbladder volvulus management is always an emergency cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: Despite the clinical similarities with the classical acute calculous cholecystitis, gallbladder volvulus is more likely to result in fatal outcome. Therefore, a high level of clinical suspicion is necessary to save lives.

Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: Diagnosis and management.

INTRODUCTION: Gallbladder adenomyomatosis is a benign acquired gallbladder disease. It can mimic cancer on radiological findings, leading to a diagnostic dilemma. The management and prognosis of these two gallbladder anomalies are entirely different. Therefore, it is essential to recognize the pathognomonic features of gallbladder adenomyomatosis is in order to accurately diagnose this pathology. This paper presents two encountered cases of gallbladder adenomyomatosis is, their diagnostic modalities as well as the algorithmic approach of their management. These two-case reports have been reported in line with the SCARE Criteria 2020 [1]. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Patient-1 was symptomatic. He was explored by an abdominal ultrasound picturing gallbladder wall thickening while the biopsy showed pleomorphic proliferation of inflammatory cells. An examination of the liver with MRI was indicated, showing diffuse parietal thickening with multiple cystic pockets. He underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with simple operative follow-up. Patient 2 was asymptomatic, a staging CT scan of acute pancreatitis revealed focal mural thinking of the gallbladder wall. A liver MRI showed an intramural cystic formation in the vesicular fundus. Given the inconclusive imaging results, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of GA. DISCUSSION: Adenomyomatosis is usually asymptomatic. Imaging can confirm the diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis without the need for invasive procedures such as vesicular biopsy. Histologic examination can also confirm the diagnosis when cholecystectomy is done. High resolution ultra-sound is the most efficient radiological examination. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for symptomatic GA or radiological suspicion of a gallbladder cancer. CONCLUSION: The practitioner should always consider gallbladder carcinoma before confirming the GA, as they share the same features but with a far worse prognosis. The likelihood of malignancy depends on radiological characteristics. In the case of inconclusive findings, cholecystectomy is justified.