Bone marrow morphology is a strong discriminator between chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified and reactive idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified can be difficult to distinguish from idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome according to the current World Health Organization guideline. To examine whether the morphological features of bone marrow might aid in the differential diagnosis of these two entities, we studied a total of 139 patients with a diagnosis of chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (n=17) or idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (n=122). As a group, abnormal bone marrow morphological features, resembling myelodysplastic syndromes, myeloproliferative neoplasm or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, were identified in 40/139 (27%) patients: 16 (94%) of those with chronic eosinophilic leukemia and 24 (20%) of those with hypereosinophilic syndrome. Abnormal bone marrow correlated with older age (P<0.001), constitutional symptoms (P<0.001), anemia (P=0.041), abnormal platelet count (P=0.002), organomegaly (P=0.008), elevated lactate dehydrogenase concentration (P=0.005), abnormal karyotype (P<0.001), as well as the presence of myeloid neoplasm-related mutations (P<0.001). Patients with abnormal bone marrow had shorter survival (48.1 months versus not reached, P<0.001), a finding which was independent of other confounding factors (P<0.001). The association between abnormal bone marrow and shorter survival was also observed in hypereosinophilic syndrome patients alone. In summary, most patients with chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified and a proportion of those with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome show abnormal bone marrow features similar to the ones encountered in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm or BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm. Among patients who are currently considered to have idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, abnormal bone marrow is a strong indicator of clonal hematopoiesis. Similar to other myeloid neoplasms, bone marrow morphology should be one of the major criteria to distinguish patients with chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified or clonal hypereosinophilic syndrome from those with truly reactive idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: epithelial mesenchymal transition contributes to esophageal remodeling and reverses with treatment.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms underlying esophageal remodeling with subepithelial fibrosis in subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have not been delineated. OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore a role for epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) in subjects with EoE and determine whether EMT resolves with treatment. METHODS: Esophageal biopsy specimens from 60 children were immunostained for epithelial (cytokeratin) and mesenchymal (vimentin) EMT biomarkers, and EMT was quantified. Subjects studied had EoE (n = 17), indeterminate EoE (n = 15), gastroesophageal reflux disease (n = 7), or normal esophagus (n = 21). EMT was analyzed for relationships to diagnosis, eosinophil counts, and indices of subepithelial fibrosis, eosinophil peroxidase, and TGF-ß immunostaining. EMT was assessed in pretreatment and posttreatment biopsy specimens from 18 subjects with EoE treated with an elemental diet, 6-food elimination diet, or topical corticosteroids (n = 6 per group). RESULTS: TGF-ß1 treatment of esophageal epithelial cells in vitro for 24 hours induced upregulation of mesenchymal genes characteristic of EMT, including N-cadherin (3.3-fold), vimentin (2.1-fold), and fibronectin (7.5-fold). EMT in esophageal biopsy specimens was associated with EoE (or indeterminate EoE) but not gastroesophageal reflux disease or normal esophagus and was correlated to eosinophil counts (r = 0.691), eosinophil peroxidase (r = 0.738), and TGF-ß (r = 0.520) immunostaining and fibrosis (r = 0.644) indices. EMT resolved with EoE treatments that induced clinicopathologic remission with reduced eosinophil counts. EMT decreased significantly after treatment by 74.1% overall in the 18 treated subjects with EoE; pretreatment versus posttreatment EMT scores were 3.17 ± 0.82 versus 0.82 ± 0.39 (P < .001), with similar decreases within treatment groups. Pretreatment/posttreatment EMT was strongly correlated with eosinophil counts for combined (r = 0.804, P < .001) and individual treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: EMT likely contributes to subepithelial fibrosis in subjects with EoE and resolves with treatments that decrease esophageal inflammation, and its resolution correlates with decreased numbers of esophageal eosinophils.