Temporality in chronic diseases and adherence to long-term therapies: From philosophy to science and back.

This narrative review exhibits the construction and validation of a hypothesis to explain how treatment non-adherence in people with chronic disease, a major issue in contemporary medicine, occurs. I propose that non-adherence to long-term therapies is at least in part due to failure to prioritize the future, which is caused by a condition I dub disruption in time projection. This article gives the rationale for this hypothesis, which is largely grounded on philosophical arguments. Then, it demonstrates the plausibility of the hypothesis: on the one hand, it is consistent with certain epidemiological data found in the literature. On the other, it is possible to predict the underlying mechanisms of this lack of prioritization from recent achievements of neuro-economics and neuroscience. Next, it reviews empirical data that provide an experimental verification for this explanatory hypothesis. Finally, a general evolutionary and philosophical meaning for adherence is proposed, considering the advantages of its preconditions, namely, patience and foresight.

Holistic psychosocial determinants of adherence to medication in people with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether adherent and non-adherent patients with type 2 diabetes can be differentiated according to psychosocial characteristics. METHODS: A total of 1214 patients were included in the analysis. Data were derived from a cross-sectional observational study of adults with diabetes of the Access Santé (Access Health) panel of Kantar Health France. Patients completed a questionnaire on adherence to medication, psychological determinants (trust in physicians, constancy of habits, patience, temporal horizon, health locus of control, obedience, psychological reactivity, prevention vs promotion, optimism vs pessimism) and social deprivation. RESULTS: Of these 1214 subjects, 46.2% were considered strictly adherent to antidiabetic medication, as reflected by negative answers to all six questions suggesting a non-adherent behaviours, whereas 48.9% provided 1-2 positive answers and 4.9% provided 3-6 positive answers, and were considered non-adherent. In addition to the effect of younger age (P=0.03), multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated the following psychosocial determinants of non-adherence: chance locus of control (P=0.02); lack of trust in physicians (P=0.010); and pessimism (P=0.021). Multiple factor analysis identified adherence and social deprivation as dimensions separating three distinct patient populations: (i) non-adherent; (ii) adherent and socially deprived; and (iii) adherent and non-socially deprived. It also revealed that patience, obedience, cautious behaviour, optimism, trust in physicians and constancy of habits were associated with adherence. CONCLUSION: Of the multiple determinants of adherence, trust in physicians and constancy of habits represent modifiable factors, and constitute targets to prevent non-adherence because they can be reinforced through patient education and improved physician - patient relationship. Also, psychosocial determinants of adherence differ widely between socially deprived and non-deprived patients.

Migrant adults with diabetes in France: Influence of family migration.

AIM: To explore the influence of migration and this parameters on the control of diabetes. METHODS: A cohort of migrant patients with type 2 diabetes was recruited in a center affiliated to the French national insurance system situated in a department with important migratory phenomenon. Patients fulfilled a questionnaire about diabetes, their migration history, and the EPICES score (deprivation score). We have explored by univariate and multivariate analysis if any of the characteristics of migration could be related to the control of diabetes. This cohort was compared to a non-migrant control group of age and sex-matched patients. RESULTS: We included 72 patients, 36 women and 36 men from 20 different countries. The mean age was 57.7 ± 9.6 years. A migration for family reunification was associated with better diabetes equilibrium (Risk of having an HbA1c ⩾8% (63.9 mmol/mol): OR 0.07 (95% IC [0.005-0.86], p = 0.04). The migrant patients who wished to share their time between France and country of origin during their retirement had a better glycaemic control than the migrant patients who would like to go alone into their country (OR 0.08 [0.01-0.78], p = 0.03). Compared to the non migrant group, the EPICES score was higher in the migrant group (52.8 vs. 28.3, p < 0.05), HbA1c was also higher in the migrant group (8.4 vs. 6.7% (68 vs. 50 mmol/mol)). CONCLUSIONS: We may fear that migrants share an increased risk of uncontrolled diabetes. Individual migration could be a risk factor of uncontrolled diabetes. Knowing the migration history of migrant patients is fundamental to understand some barriers of care.

Clinical inertia and its impact on treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Many people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) fail to achieve glycaemic control promptly after diagnosis and do not receive timely treatment intensification. This may be in part due to 'clinical inertia', defined as the failure of healthcare providers to initiate or intensify therapy when indicated. Physician-, patient- and healthcare-system-related factors all contribute to clinical inertia. However, decisions that appear to be clinical inertia may, in fact, be only 'apparent' clinical inertia and may reflect good clinical practice on behalf of the physician for a specific patient. Delay in treatment intensification can happen at all stages of treatment for people with T2DM, including prescription of lifestyle changes after diagnosis, introduction of pharmacological therapy, use of combination therapy where needed and initiation of insulin. Clinical inertia may contribute to people with T2DM living with suboptimal glycaemic control for many years, with dramatic consequences for the patient in terms of quality of life, morbidity and mortality, and for public health because of the huge costs associated with uncontrolled T2DM. Because multiple factors can lead to clinical inertia, potential solutions most likely require a combination of approaches involving fundamental changes in medical care. These could include the adoption of a person-centred model of care to account for the complex considerations influencing treatment decisions by patients and physicians. Better patient education about the progressive nature of T2DM and the risks inherent in long-term poor glycaemic control may also reinforce the need for regular treatment reviews, with intensification when required.

[Factors associated with medication non-adherence in uncontrolled hypertensive males and females: ODACE study]. / Facteurs associés à la non-observance chez les hommes et chez les femmes hypertendus non contrôlés : étude ODACE.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was (1) to measure adherence in males and females with uncontrolled hypertension, and (2) to identify factors associated with non-adherence to antihypertensive medication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Each general practitioner (GP) should include the first two male and the first two female patients with uncontrolled treated hypertension. Adherence to antihypertensive treatment was estimated by the GP and using the French League Against High blood pressure (FLAH) self-administered questionnaire. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-adherence on the FLAH scale, independently in males and in females. RESULTS: A total of 1630 males and 1612 females were included in the analysis. Adherence to treatment was significantly better in females or when estimated by the GP. Lack of motivation was the first factor associated with poor adherence in both sexes. Considering hypertension as a simple anomaly and not a disease that can lead to cardiac or cerebral disorders was the second common parameter in both sexes. Other common factors were: having monthly periods of financial difficulties in facing his/her needs and absence of regular screening for colon cancer. CONCLUSION: Adherence to treatment is better in uncontrolled hypertensive females. Poor adherence is mainly associated with non-clinical factors. The lack of motivation is the most important element.

Improving postpartum glucose screening after gestational diabetes mellitus: a cohort study to evaluate the multicentre IMPACT initiative.

AIMS: To evaluate a mobilization campaign, the IMPACT initiative, which included multidisciplinary meetings, provision of information and a systematic prescription of an oral glucose tolerance test to improve the rate of glucose screening in women with gestational diabetes mellitus in the four largest maternity units in our area, starting in March 2011. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the level of self-reported screening during the first 6 months postpartum of women who gave birth after having been diagnosed with gestational diabetes before (January 2009 to December 2010) and after the IMPACT campaign (April 2011 to February 2012). RESULTS: We included 961 women (589 in the period before and 372 in the period after the campaign was initiated) with a mean ± SD age of 33.2 ± 5.3 years and BMI of 27.8 ± 5.3 kg/m². Multivariate analysis, stratified using a propensity score in order to limit bias caused by imbalance between both periods, showed that the postpartum screening rate was higher after the campaign began (48.9 vs 33.3%, odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5; P = 0.019) and higher in women who received insulin treatment during pregnancy (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.6; P < 0.001), consumed fruit and vegetables daily (odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4; P = 0.035) and did not smoke (smoking vs non-smoking: odds ratio 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7; P = 0.01). There was no interaction between the campaign effect and these particular conditions. The proportion of oral glucose tolerance tests performed in women who underwent screening increased from 6.3 to 33.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The IMPACT campaign increased postpartum screening, and the use the oral glucose tolerance test in particular. The effect of this initiative might be reinforced in women who are non-daily consumers of fruit and vegetables, smokers and those who do not receive insulin treatment during pregnancy.

Clinical inertia, uncertainty and individualized guidelines.

Doctors often do not follow the guidelines of good practice based on evidence-based medicine, and this "clinical inertia" may represent an impediment to efficient care. The aims of this article are as follows: 1) to demonstrate that this phenomenon is often the consequence of a discrepancy between the technical rationality of evidence-based medicine and the modes of reasoning of physicians practiced in "real-life", which is marked by uncertainty and risk; 2) to investigate in this context the meaning of the recent, somewhat paradoxical, concept of "individualized guidelines"; and 3) to revisit the real, essentially pedagogical, place of guidelines in medical practice.

Factors associated with screening for glucose abnormalities after gestational diabetes mellitus: baseline cohort of the interventional IMPACT study.

INTRODUCTION: Although it is important to screen women who have had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) for abnormal post-partum glucose levels, such testing is rarely performed. The aim of this study was to use data from the first observational phase of the IMPACT study to determine rates of screening within 6 months of delivery in a multiethnic cohort, focusing in particular on the effects of social deprivation and the risk of future diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To investigate the frequency of post-partum screening, charts were analyzed, and all women attending four centres located in a deprived area who had had GDM between January 2009 and December 2010 were contacted by phone. The Evaluation of Precarity and Inequalities in Health Examination Centres (EPICES) deprivation index and Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISK) questionnaire were also evaluated. RESULTS: Data were evaluable for 589 of the 719 women contacted (mean age: 33.4 ± 5.2 years; mean body mass index: 27.6 ± 5.4 kg/m(2)), and 196 (33.3%) reported having been screened. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with a lack of screening were smoking [odds ratio (OR): 0.42 (0.20-0.90), P<0.05], low consumption of fruit and vegetables [OR: 0.58 (0.39-0.82), P<0.01] and heavier offspring birth weight (P<0.05), although there were no differences in FINDRISK and EPICES scores between screened and unscreened women. CONCLUSION: One-third of women who had had GDM reported having been screened for dysglycaemia at 6 months post-partum. However, it is expected that the interventional phase of the IMPACT study will increase screening rates, especially in women with the risk factors associated with lower screening rates during this observational phase.

Physical activity and type 2 diabetes. Recommandations of the SFD (Francophone Diabetes Society) diabetes and physical activity working group.

Although regular physical activity is an integral part of T2D management, few diabetic patients have a sufficient level of physical activity. However over the past decade or so, the beneficial effects of regular physical activity have been well demonstrated, both in T2D prevention (50% reduction in the incidence of T2D in subjects with high metabolic risk) as well as T2D management for the improvement of glycaemic control (mean 0.7% improvement of HbA1c) and the reduction of T2D-related comorbidities (improvement in blood pressure values and lipid profile, decrease in insulin resistance). Physical activity has both acute effects (effects of one exercise session) and more prolonged effects of exercise when it is repeated on a regular basis (training effect). In addition, the physical activity recommendations have been extended to a wide range of physical activities (by combining both endurance and muscle strengthening exercises), thus varying the physical activity practiced according to the patient's available time, practice sites, preferences and interests. Following a pathophysiology review, the effects of physical activity will be discussed and presented in terms of evidence-based medicine. The recommendations will be defined and practical prescribing information will be suggested, while taking into account that clinicians are concerned with answering questions regarding how, where and with whom: how can patients be motivated to practice a physical activity over the long-term? And how can qualified exercise trainers and appropriate practice settings be found?

A psychophysical account of patient non-adherence to medical prescriptions. The case of insulin dose adjustment.

AIM: Diabetic patients often do not adjust their insulin doses using the algorithms that they have been taught. While this behavior may intuitively have a number of causes, such as the complexity of the decision or the fear of hypoglycaemia, we propose in this article a more general, "psychophysical", explanation based on behavioral economics concepts used to describe decisions made under uncertainty and risk. The concepts discussed herein may not be familiar to clinicians, who will find here an introduction to theories that may be helpful in understanding some aspects of non-adherence to medical prescriptions. RESULTS: 1) The Prospect Theory of Kahneman and Tversky proposes that choices made in the context of risk are subject to loss aversion. 2) Decisions under uncertainty use mental short cuts called "heuristics", which can lead to biases; for instance, overestimating the probability of the risk. 3) To understand the very concept of risk, emotions must be considered with a special focus on anticipated regret. 4) Finally, selection difficulty is an important determinant of the preference for the status quo. CONCLUSION: These concepts may be relevant for understanding a preference for the status quo in decisions made in a context of uncertainty and risk, such as insulin dose adjustment. We suggest that these mental mechanisms may also be involved in other aspects of patients' non-adherence. As other common human behaviors, non-adherence may actually often be a consequence of biases resulting from our ways of thinking, being both cognitive and emotional, and, according to Kahneman, more often "fast" than "slow". Empirical studies are needed to support this hypothesis.

Weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy in super superobesity.

Objective. This prospective study evaluated laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for its safety and efficiency in excess weight loss (%EWL) in super superobese patients (BMI >60 Kg/m(2)). Results. Thirty patients (33 women and 7 men) were included, with mean age of 35 years (range 18 to 59). Mean preoperative BMI was 66 Kg/m(2) (range 60 to 85). The study included one patient with complete situs inversus and 4 (14%) with previous restrictive gastric banding. The mean operative time was 120 minutes (range 80 to 220 min) and the mean hospital stay was 7.5 days (4 to 28 days). There was no postoperative mortality or need for a laparotomy conversion. Two subphrenic hematomas, one gastric fistula, and one pulmonary embolism, were the major complications. After 18 months 17 (77%) had sufficient weight loss and six had insufficient results, leading to either re-sleeve gastrectomy (3), or gastric bypass (2). Three years after the initial laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, the mean EWL was 51% (range 21 to 82). Conclusion. The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and efficient operating procedure for treating super superobesity. In the case of insufficient weight loss, a second-stage operation like resleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass can be proposed.

Limbic encephalitis and type 1 diabetes with glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) autoimmunity: improvement with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy.

Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GAD-abs) are an immunological factor involved in type 1 diabetes and other diseases involving the central nervous system. This report is of a patient with type 1 diabetes and a rare case of non-paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis mediated by anti-GAD65 antibodies that improved with the use of immunosuppressive drugs.

Patients' impatience is an independent determinant of poor diabetes control.

AIMS: Some individuals have a preference for the present rather than for the future. We investigated the impact of this impatient relationship to temporality on adherence to medication and HbA(1c) level in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional monocenter study in 90 patients consulting for a health check-up at a Center for Preventive Medicine. We used questionnaires assessing adherence to medication, impatience in a fictive monetary choice (preferring a smaller amount now to a higher amount later) and in daily life situations, foresight, locus of control, and social deprivation. RESULTS: Impatience in the monetary choice was associated with non-adherence to medication (P=0.005). In a multivariate logistic regression model, the risk of observing HbA(1c)≥7% was associated with a long duration of diabetes (OR 5.2, CI 1.7-15.7, P=0.003), monetary impatience (OR=5.1, CI 1.7-15.4, P=0.004), a high "chance and other people" score of the locus of control (OR=5.1, CI 1.7-15.7, P=0.004), a suboptimal foresight (OR 3.9, CI 1.2-12.0, P=0.02). A decision-tree analysis (CHAID algorithm) showed that in this cohort of 90 patients, the 11 people who were adherent to medication, patient in the monetary scenario, had optimal foresight, and gave importance neither to chance nor to other people, had all HbA(1c) below 7%. CONCLUSION: An impatient relationship to temporality was found associated with non-adherence to medication and uncontrolled HbA(1c) in type 2 diabetic patients. Treatment strategies for chronic diseases should be tailored according to this novel dimension of psychology.

Information and therapeutic education of diabetic patients in French hospitals: the OBSIDIA survey.

AIM: Although several studies have evaluated the efficacy of therapeutic education (TE) programmes in patients with diabetes and demonstrated the benefits of such interventions, operational aspects are rarely described. For this reason, this national survey was conducted to investigate TE in France, and to identify its obstacles and needs. METHODS: A preliminary qualitative phase was extended to include a quantitative survey through face-to-face interviews, followed by a web-based self-administered questionnaire sent out to every healthcare professional dealing with diabetic patients. RESULTS: From the expanded web-based survey, 272 questionnaires were analyzed (39% from academic hospitals, 54% from general hospitals and 7% from private clinics); 85% of these sites provided TE for inpatients. Overall, TE was offered to 66% of patients (84% new patients) and was individualized in 55% of cases, and involved 9.4 healthcare professionals on average, with physicians, nurses and dietitians making up the core team. The TE offered encompassed a wide range of diabetes topics. However, of every 10 healthcare professionals, only 35% received specific training, while 45% received coaching from their colleagues and 10% received no training at all. Evaluation of TE was carried out in 60% of teams by questionnaires or interviews. CONCLUSION: TE is well implemented in French hospitals, but lacks homogeneity and standardization. Training is inadequate from both qualitative and quantitative points of view, and evaluation of TE procedures needs to be developed. There is also a need for more funding and dedicated qualified staff, a lack of which is partly due to the fact that TE is not a recognized medical activity in hospitals.

Is there an impatience genotype leading to non-adherence to long-term therapies?

In chronic diseases such as diabetes, adherence to therapy aims to preserve health, which is a long-term objective, whereas non-adherence tends to present an immediate 'reward'. We propose that non-adherence, like addiction, is at least in part due to the fact that, for physiological, and maybe genetic reasons described in a new field, neuroeconomics, a number of people have a taste for the present rather than the future. Thus, for 'impatient patients' it is natural not to adhere to therapeutic prescriptions that share the characteristic of being future-oriented. This hypothesis may apply to any disease requiring long-term therapy.

Linguistic barriers in diabetes care.

For a message to be conveyed successfully, both the words (translation step) and the meaning (interpretation step) of what is said need to be understood. This holds true even when the patient and healthcare provider speak the same language, in that the message can be lost if the patient is unable to put it into context. Linguistic barriers can pose major problems. Patient education needs to avoid jargon, and when introducing a new concept to the patient, the healthcare provider needs to check that it is understood.

Benefits of Ophdiat, a telemedical network to screen for diabetic retinopathy: a retrospective study in five reference hospital centres.

AIM: One objective of Ophdiat, a telemedical network using digital non-mydriatic cameras in Ile-de-France, is to develop a comprehensive screening programme that provides access to annual fundus examinations to all diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of this programme in a hospital setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 500 case reports of diabetic patients hospitalized before and after Ophdiat setup was performed in five reference hospital centres. At each centre, 100 case reports (50 before, 50 after) of patients aged greater than 18 years, hospitalized for their annual check-up, with no known diabetic retinopathy (DR) before hospitalization and with the last fundus examination performed greater than 11 months previously, were randomly selected. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose fundus examinations were performed during hospitalization; secondary endpoints were the number of cases of DR found and the time taken by ophthalmologists to make the diagnosis. RESULTS: The mean proportion of patients with fundus examinations was 50.4% and 72.4% before and after, respectively, Ophdiat (P<0.01). The prevalence of DR was 11.1% before and 12.7% after (not significant). The mean time taken by an ophthalmologist per diagnosis of DR was 0.90 half-day before and 0.32 half-day after Ophdiat. CONCLUSION: This evaluation shows that Ophdiat, combined with the availability of modern and effective devices, has improved DR screening in diabetology departments in hospitals. Additional human resources would certainly ensure more effective use of the system.

Impact of short-duration lifestyle intervention in collaboration with general practitioners in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

AIM: As the constantly progressing metabolic syndrome is accompanied by an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular complications, it is essential to take appropriate, non-pharmacological, cost-effective measures immediately after the diagnosis has been made. The purpose of our prospective, non-controlled, 6-month study was to determine the impact of lifestyle interventions involving patients' behaviour in collaboration with their general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: We recruited 95 patients (46 men and 49 women, aged 45 to 60 years) who presented with the metabolic syndrome. Each patient received a copy of the national French recommendations (PNNS) leaflet, containing guidelines aimed to balance dietary intake and increase daily physical activity. Socioeconomic status was estimated using the EPICES score. Following a less than 1 hour face-to-face interventional session with each patient to present the lifestyle-modification goals, we contacted each patient's GP by phone to advise on measures to reinforce these lifestyle modifications. RESULTS: The percentage of patients presenting with the metabolic syndrome decreased by 52.4% after 6 months. Hypertension, triglycerides and waist circumference decreased by 30.5, 29.3 and 22.0%, respectively, in the study patients. Rates of compliance to PNNS goals at the last follow-up versus baseline were: for drinks, 63.0% versus 22.2%; for sweet products, 91.4% versus 49.4%; for fat, 91.4% versus 80.3%; and for increased exercise, 26.9% versus 6.4%. CONCLUSION: Short-term, single lifestyle modifications targeting the metabolic syndrome in collaboration with GPs was effective in decreasing most of the parameters of the syndrome. However, no factors predictive of success were identified.