Drug choices for intravenous and spinal analgesia.

Opioids remain at the center of most postoperative pain control therapies. The choice between full agonist opioids should be determined by the time for a given dose to produce its maximum effect (i.e., latency to peak effect), and the duration of action. There is little to choose between different opioids administered by patient-controlled analgesia. Parenterally-administered NSAIDs (e.g., ketorolac) contribute significantly to analgesia and reduce opioid requirements. Morphine may be the opioid of choice for epidural administration. The combination of epidural opioids and local anesthetics provides synergistic analgesia and appears to provide superior analgesia with activity. Several nonopioid receptor agonists are under investigation as neuraxial analgesics.

Anesthesia-based pain services improve the quality of postoperative pain management.

Anesthesia-based pain services are facilitating improvements in the quality of care of surgical patients by developing and directing institution-wide perioperative analgesia programs that include interdisciplinary collaborations. However, the impact of anesthesia-based pain services has not been evaluated in a systematic fashion. This prospective multisite study (n = 23 hospitals) utilized a standardized approach to evaluate the quality of pain care provided to patients who were and who were not cared for by an anesthesia-based pain service. A total of 5837 patients were evaluated using a standardized survey that consisted of a medical record review and a patient interview. The data were collected as part of the hospitals' quality improvement activities. Forty-nine percent of the patients were cared for by an anesthesia-based pain service. Patients who received pain service care reported significantly lower pain intensity scores; had lower levels of pain in the postoperative period; had a lower incidence of pruritus, sedation, and nausea; and experienced significantly less pain than expected. In addition, these patients were more likely to receive patient education about postoperative pain management; were more satisfied with their postoperative pain management; and were discharged sooner from the hospital. The findings from this study demonstrate that the care provided by anesthesia-based pain services has a significant impact on patient outcomes.

Transition to post-operative epidural or patient-controlled intravenous analgesia following total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for abdominal surgery.

Remifentanil is an ultrashort acting mu opioid, well suited to total intravenous (i.v.) anaesthesia. Pain immediately following emergence from anaesthesia is a potential problem because of the rapid offset. This study investigated the transition from remifentanil/propofol total intravenous anaesthesia to post-operative analgesia with epidural or patient controlled analgesia morphine in 22 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. A remifentanil post-operative infusion initiated during emergence was titrated in the recovery room for 30 min, at which time 14% of patients had a pain score of 2 and 86% had pain scores of 0 or 1 (0 = no pain; 1 = mild pain; 2 = moderate pain; 3 = severe pain), at a mean infusion rate of 0.086 microgram kg-1 min-1. A smooth transition was then made to either epidural analgesia or patient controlled analgesia with morphine; pain scores were not significantly changed during the transition. Nausea occurred in 16 of the 22 patients, but only following administration of morphine. Epidural analgesia produced significantly lower pain scores on the surgical ward compared with patient controlled analgesia.

Acute pain management of the chronic pain patient on opiates: a survey of caregivers at University of Washington Medical Center.

OBJECTIVE: The provision of acute pain management for the chronic pain patient can pose a challenge. We sought to characterize management issues. SUBJECTS/SETTING: An anonymous survey was distributed to 270 physicians and 212 nurses at University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) in an attempt to characterize management issues. DESIGN: Caregivers were queried regarding treatment modalities, efficacy of anxiolysis, patient attributes, concern of the quantity of medication, criteria for patient evaluation, and other management issues. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 61.8% were physicians, and 38.2% were nurses. The mean duration in practice was 7.7 years. The responses from the two groups were similar. Seventy-five percent reported using different pain-evaluation techniques for chronic pain patients than those utilized for the "average" patient. Pain scores were used frequently in the average patient, whereas ability to perform activities was used more commonly in the chronic pain patient (p < 0.0001). Half of the respondents expressed concern regarding the amount of medication used and level of sedation. The same proportion found anxiolysis to be a helpful adjunct. The use of a time-contingent "pain cocktail" as an oral medication was a useful strategy for 88% of respondents. The least labor-intensive modality reported was patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 84.5% of respondents; intravenous opiate fusion, 5.3%; and epidural analgesia, 11.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The survey describes caregiver concerns regarding this patient population, including medication use, sedation, length of hospital stay, and evaluation techniques.

Evaluation of intravenous ketorolac administered by bolus or infusion for treatment of postoperative pain. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Ketorolac is a nonsteroidal analgesic that may provide postoperative analgesia without opioid-related side effects. This double-blind, randomized, multicenter study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous ketorolac in 207 patients during the first 24 h after major surgery. METHODS: Subjects were assigned to receive one of three analgesic regimens: a ketorolac infusion, ketorolac boluses, or placebo. All subjects had access to intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Evaluations included PCA morphine used, pain assessment (categorical pain intensity scores and visual analogue pain scores), pain relief (categorical pain relief scores), sedation, presence of adverse events, and overall rating of regimens by study observers and patients. RESULTS: Patients in the ketorolac infusion group (but not the ketorolac bolus group) used less morphine (average 33 mg) than did the placebo group (44 mg) (P = 0.009). Significant differences favoring both ketorolac groups were seen in the pain intensity and the categorical pain relief scores at various time points during the study. At the termination of the study, compared with the placebo group, categorical pain intensity scores were lower in the ketorolac bolus group; visual analogue pain scores were lower in both ketorolac groups; and pain relief scores were higher in the ketorolac bolus group. The incidence of vomiting was significantly greater in the placebo group (27%) than in the ketorolac infusion group (12%) or bolus group (9%) (P = 0.032 and P = 0.005, respectively). The incidence of postoperative fever was 10% in the ketorolac bolus group and 25% in the placebo group (P = 0.013). Study observers noted less nursing difficulty while caring for patients in the ketorolac infusion group (P = 0.015). Study observers and patients in both ketorolac groups reported statistically significant overall drug superiority compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that intravenous boluses or infusions of ketorolac in conjunction with PCA morphine provide effective, safe analgesia after major surgery and improve on the response to PCA morphine alone.

Management of acute pain.

This review discusses the inadequacies of postoperative pain management in the UK and recommendations to improve its quality. Advanced pain-relieving techniques are available; in this article we discuss the practical considerations of delivering these successfully to patients through the introduction of acute pain teams, and especially through extension of the nurses' role.

Patient satisfaction with intravenous PCA or epidural morphine.

In many institutions postoperative patients may receive morphine for analgesia administered into the epidural space, epidural opioid analgesia (EOA), or through intravenous self-administered patient-controlled analgesia pumps (PCA). Although a number of studies have compared the two approaches with regard to efficacy and side effects, there is less known with regard to patient satisfaction and its sources. In this study, 711 patients using PCA morphine and 205 patients receiving epidural morphine following a variety of gynaecological, urological, orthopaedic, and general surgical procedures rated their satisfaction with the method they used on a 0-10 verbal analogue satisfaction scale (0 = very dissatisfied; 10 = very satisfied). A consecutive subset of 100 patients (50 from EOA group and 50 from the PCA group) underwent further evaluation to identify advantages and disadvantages of the technique used which contributed to their satisfaction and/or dissatisfaction. Overall satisfaction (mean +/- SD) in the two large groups was 8.6 +/- 1.8 for PCA and 9.0 +/- 1.5 for EOA (P < 0.01). In the subset of 100 patients, there were differences between the EOA and PCA groups with regard to the advantages and disadvantages selected. Patients in the PCA group identified "personal control" and "method worked quickly" as advantages whereas patients receiving EOA selected "clear mind," "effective relief resting," and "effective relief while moving or coughing." The single disadvantage identified more frequently by PCA patients was "pain immediately after surgery before method became effective." Disadvantages identified more frequently by EOA patients were "side effects" and "poor pain relief." We conclude that overall patient satisfaction was high whether patients received PCA or EOA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Self-administration of midazolam for postoperative anxiety: a double blinded study.

Anxiety is almost inevitably present in patients facing surgery. The optimal management of postoperative pain requires the acknowledgement of perioperative anxiety and the inclusion of pharmacological and/or non-pharmacological means of alleviating the fear and worry inherent in the surgical experience. In a double-blind randomized design, 39 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomies were given postoperative access to a standard patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine pump for pain and a PCA pump dispensing either low-dose midazolam or saline for anxiety. Measures of anxiety and pain were completed pre-operatively and for 2 days postoperatively. Utilization of morphine and 'anxiolytic agent' were recorded. Analysis of covariance was applied to the data to control for the imbalance of cancer patients between the 2 groups. While both groups of patients chose to utilize their 'anxiety pump' throughout the study, those patients receiving midazolam had significantly lower postoperative Spielberger State Anxiety scores and visual analogue scale anxiety scores. Patient-controlled midazolam in doses used in this study were safe and effective in managing anxiety but did not influence pain scores or the amount of PCA morphine patients used. Pre-operative levels of depression were significantly associated with postoperative pain levels independent of treatment group or cancer diagnosis.

Postoperative epidural morphine is safe on surgical wards.

The use of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia outside of intensive care units remains controversial. In this report our anesthesiology-based acute pain service documents experience with 1,106 consecutive postoperative patients treated with epidural morphine on regular surgical wards. This experience involved 4,343 total patient days of care and 11,089 individual epidural morphine injections. On a 0-10 verbal analog scale, patient-reported median pain scores at rest and with coughing or ambulation were 1 (inter-quartile range 3) and 4 (interquartile range 4), respectively. The incidence of side effects requiring medication were as follows: pruritus 24%, nausea 29%, and respiratory depression 0.2%. There were no deaths, neurologic injuries, or infections associated with the technique. Migration of epidural catheters into the subarachnoid space and into epidural veins each occurred twice. Overall, 1,051 of the 1,106 patients (95%) experienced none of the following problems: catheter obstruction, premature dislodgement, painful injections, catheter migration, infection, or respiratory depression. We conclude that postoperative pain can be safely and effectively treated with epidural morphine on surgical wards.