Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Radiol Med ; 117(5): 855-64, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22228125

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From November 2009 to February 2010, 74 participants (40 MS patients and 34 healthy controls) were enrolled in a randomised singleblind prospective study. All participants underwent ultrasonography (US) to detect signs of CCSVI. RESULTS: CCSVI was detected in 55% of patients in the MS group and 35% in the control group; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.089). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, a slight difference exists in the prevalence of CCSVI between MS and healthy controls, but it is not as yet clear which parameters may be most significant. This preliminary study failed to show a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of CCSVI among patients affected by MS. It did, however, reveal a tendency that requires a larger number of patients to achieve statistically significant results.


Subject(s)
Cerebrovascular Circulation , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial , Venous Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Venous Insufficiency/epidemiology , Venous Insufficiency/etiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Statistics, Nonparametric
2.
Radiol Med ; 114(1): 95-110, 2009 Feb.
Article in English, Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18820992

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be an alternative to surgical endarterectomy not only in high-risk patients. Few data are available regarding the long-term clinical efficacy of CAS with the use of cerebral protection devices and the incidence of restenosis. Our experience demonstrates that if certain requirements are fulfilled, CAS can be considered a safe and effective treatment with high short-and long-term success rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the past 8 years, we treated 1,003 patients (1,096 arteries) affected by internal carotid artery stenosis, 93 with bilateral stenosis. Of these, 567 (51.74%) were symptomatic and 529 (48.26%) asymptomatic lesions. The preprocedural evaluation was performed with Doppler ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance (MR) angiography/computed tomography (CT) angiography and a neurological evaluation. Antiplatelet therapy was administered before and after the procedure. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 1,092 cases (99.6%), and a cerebral protection device was successfully used in 1,019 procedures (92.9%). The 30-day transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/stroke/death rate was 2.16%: death (0.18%) major stroke (0.45%) and minor stroke/TIA (1.53%). During a follow-up up to 8 years, restenoses occurred in 39 cases (3.57%), of which 28 were post-CAS (2.57%) and 11 post-CAS performed for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (1%). Only five symptomatic restenoses>80% were treated with a repeated endovascular procedure. CONCLUSIONS: A retrospective analysis of our experience suggests that CAS is a safe and effective procedure with better results than endarterectomy. In up to 8 years of follow-up, CAS seems to be effective in preventing stroke, with a low restenosis rate.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty , Carotid Artery, Internal , Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiography , Carotid Stenosis/diagnosis , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Stroke/prevention & control , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler
3.
J Vasc Access ; 4(2): 50-5, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17642060

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper is to determine if patient controlled analgesia (PCA) by means of programmable pumps improves patients' autonomy and to verify if the short-term central venous catheter - implanted when pain is first evident - makes the quality of life worse in comparison with an early implanted port. Forty non-terminally ill patients affected by urinary malignant pathologies with visceral and bone metastases were enrolled in a prospective and randomised study at the Urology Department of 'La Sapienza' University in Rome, Italy. Intensity of pain and tolerability of venous access were assessed for the first 7 days, and weekly for 3 months. Such data were used to adjust drug therapy. In this study we hypothesized that a delayed central venous catheter implant, when the pain is at first considerably evident, can interfere negatively with drug treatment. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and the brief pain inventory (BPI) were administered to the patients, and these showed good levels of analgesia in both groups and a greater comfort to the patients with the previously implanted port in comparison with a short-term central venous catheter. In conclusion, PCA achieves a constant level of drugs and enables the patient to voluntary control the pain by means of supplemental boluses. Both central devices seem to provide similar technical benefits, but the port is much more easily tolerated and the quality of life is increased if it is already available when pain is first evident.

4.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 37(1): 1-11, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11164714

ABSTRACT

Pain from metastases of primitive cancer is the first symptom of disease in 15--20% of patients and remains the most common cause of cancer-related pain. 30--70% of patients have metastases at diagnosis, and 80% of them at the moment of death. Functional impairment of skeleton, neurologic symptoms, pathological fractures and pain are the most important indications for palliative treatment which should result in tumor regression, relief in cancer-related symptoms and maintainance of functional integrity. Bone metastases are treated with the systemic therapies including radiotherapy, hormonal manipulation, biphosphonates, calcitonin, surgical treatment, and chemotherapy. Conventional use of opioids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs does not always produce satisfactory analgesic result in treated patients because of incidental and intermittent nature of pain and unacceptable side effects. Alternative strategies (peripheric and central nerve blocks, neurolysis) are frequently required. A proper use of different modalities of treatment enhances the probability of achieving relief of pain and maintaining an acceptable quality of life.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Female , Humans , Male , Pain/etiology , Pain Management , Palliative Care
5.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 18(2 Suppl 19): S65-6, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10824290

ABSTRACT

Cervicogenic headache is a relatively common pain syndrome related to functional and/or degenerative alterations of the cervical spine tract. Administration of steroid represents an effective therapy for this headache, due to the anti-inflammatory effects combined with its direct analgesic effects on the C fibers. The epidural injection of steroids, while requesting skilled personnel for its execution, gives short term (2-month) pain relief with few risks or side effects. Moreover, epidural steroids allow reduction of analgesic drug consumption.


Subject(s)
Headache Disorders/drug therapy , Steroids/administration & dosage , Humans , Injections, Epidural/adverse effects , Injections, Epidural/methods , Steroids/adverse effects , Steroids/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...