Relapsing malignant phyllodes tumour presenting as isolated acrometastases.

Malignant phyllodes tumours (PTs) are aggressive neoplasms with high rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis. With no known effective chemotherapy and no approved targeted therapy in the setting of metastatic disease, prognosis is limited with an often-relapsing course of disease. We report a case of a woman in her late 30s with a diagnosis of recurrent metastatic malignant PT who was found to have acrometastases of the malignant PT to the right distal index and small digits. We emphasise the potential for atypical patterns of metastases in patients with malignant PT and the need to recognise acrometastasis as an unusual but morbid manifestation of disease. Given the high growth rate of malignant PTs, the lack of systemic treatment options, and the ensuing distress for patients, prompt diagnosis and early intervention is crucial.

Automated segmentation of ablated lesions using deep convolutional neural networks: A basis for response assessment following laser interstitial thermal therapy.

BACKGROUND: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) of intracranial tumors or radiation necrosis enables tissue diagnosis, cytoreduction, and rapid return to systemic therapies. Ablated tissue remains in situ, resulting in characteristic post-LITT edema associated with transient clinical worsening and complicating post-LITT response assessment. METHODS: All patients receiving LITT at a single center for tumors or radiation necrosis from 2015 to 2023 with ≥9 months of MRI follow-up were included. An nnU-Net segmentation model was trained to automatically segment contrast-enhancing lesion volume (CeLV) of LITT-treated lesions on T1-weighted images. Response assessment was performed using volumetric measurements. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty four unique MRI exams of 61 LITT-treated lesions and 6 control cases of medically managed radiation necrosis were analyzed. Automated segmentation was accurate in 367/384 (95.6%) images. CeLV increased to a median of 68.3% (IQR 35.1-109.2%) from baseline at 1-3 months from LITT (P = 0.0012) and returned to baseline thereafter. Overall survival (OS) for LITT-treated patients was 39.1 (9.2-93.4) months. Lesion expansion above 40% from volumetric nadir or baseline was considered volumetric progression. Twenty-one of 56 (37.5%) patients experienced progression for a volumetric progression-free survival of 21.4 (6.0-93.4) months. Patients with volumetric progression had worse OS (17.3 vs 62.1 months, P = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Post-LITT CeLV expansion is quantifiable and resolves within 6 months of LITT. Development of response assessment criteria for LITT-treated lesions is feasible and should be considered for clinical trials. Automated lesion segmentation could speed the adoption of volumetric response criteria in clinical practice.