ABSTRACT
Reprinted 2009.(AU)
Subject(s)
Industrial Disaster , Accidents, Occupational , Occupational Risks , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A widely reported ABO-mismatch accident in March of 2003 raised concerns about the reliability of the transplantation system. Because this type of failure is rare and significant, we performed a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) of the donor-recipient matching processes for thoracic organ transplantation. METHODS: A probabilistic risk assessment was performed. RESULTS: The likelihood of accidental incompatible implantation was already low in 2003. The PRA model indicates that the likelihood of such an event was 1.38x10 per donated organ. This estimate correlates closely with the observed rate of these accidents. Based on this model, process changes put in place shortly after the accident reduced the probability to approximately 3.08x10 and changes put in place in October 2004 further reduced the probability to approximately 2.22x10 per organ donated. CONCLUSIONS: The observed and predicted likelihoods of accidental incompatible thoracic organ transplantation are comparable. These likelihoods are several orders of magnitude smaller than other hazards associated with solid organ transplantation. The PRA model indicates that changes that followed the March 2003 accident further reduced the likelihood of accidental incompatible implantation by roughly two orders of magnitude. Quantitative estimates from PRA can be used to assess risks in healthcare and to gauge the impact of system changes on these risks.
Subject(s)
ABO Blood-Group System , Blood Group Incompatibility/epidemiology , Transplantation Immunology , Humans , Risk Assessment , Thorax , Treatment Failure , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A survey of over 1600 drivers is reported, the results of which are consistent with those reported in an earlier study (Reason et al. 1990), which identified a three-fold typology of aberrant driving behaviours. The first type, lapses, are absent-minded behaviours with consequences mainly for the perpetrator, posing no threat to other road users. The second type, errors, are typically misjudgements and failures of observation that may be hazardous to others. The third type, violations, involve deliberate contraventions of safe driving practice. In the present study the survey instrument used, the Driver Behaviour Questionnaire, was also shown to be reliable over time. Each type of behaviour was found to have different demographic correlates. Most importantly, accident liability was predicted by self-reported tendency to commit violations, but not by tendency to make errors or to have lapses. The implications for road safety are discussed.
