Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Sprint Interval Training on Anthropometric Measures and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Healthy Young Women.

Purpose: To compare the effects of 8 weeks of two types of interval training, Sprint Interval Training (SIT) and High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT), on anthropometric measures and cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy young women. Methods: A randomized clinical trial in which 49 young active women [age, 30.4 ± 6.1 years; body mass index, 24.8 ± 3.1 kg.m-2; peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), 34.9±7.5 mL.kg-1.min-1] were randomly allocated into a SIT or HIIT group. The SIT group performed four bouts of 30 s all-out cycling efforts interspersed with 4 min of recovery (passive or light cycling with no load). The HIIT group performed four bouts of 4-min efforts at 90-95% of peak heart rate (HRpeak) interspersed with 3 min of active recovery at 50-60% of HRpeak. At baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention, waist circumference, skinfolds (triceps, subscapular, suprailiac, abdominal, and thigh), body mass and BMI were measured by standard procedures and cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed by cardiorespiratory graded exertion test on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer. Results: The HIIT and SIT groups improved, respectively, 14.5 ± 22.9% (P < 0.001) and 16.9 ± 23.4% (P < 0.001) in VO2peak after intervention, with no significant difference between groups. Sum of skinfolds reduced 15.8 ± 7.9 and 22.2 ± 6.4 from baseline (P < 0.001) for HIIT and SIT groups, respectively, with greater reduction for SIT compared to HIIT (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant decreases in waist circumference (P < 0.001) for the HIIT (-3.1 ± 1.1%) and SIT (-3.3 ± 1.8%) groups, with no significant difference between groups. Only SIT showed significant reductions in body weight and BMI (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Eight weeks of HIIT and SIT resulted in improvements in anthropometric measures and cardiorespiratory fitness, even in the absence of changes in dietary intake. In addition, the SIT protocol induced greater reductions than the HIIT protocol in the sum of skinfolds. Both protocols appear to be time-efficient interventions, since the HIIT and SIT protocols took 33 and 23 min (16 and 2 min of effective training) per session, respectively.

Association of estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with autonomic modulation of heart rate in users and nonusers of oral contraceptives.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the association between estrogen receptor α gene (ESR1) polymorphisms and blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and autonomic modulation of HR in a sample population. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred thirty-two young healthy women were selected, and those using oral contraceptives (OC) were compared with nonusers (control group). Short-term HR variability (HRV) was evaluated in both the supine and sitting positions using temporal indices rMSSD [square root of the mean squared differences of successive R-R intervals (RRi) divided by the number of RRi minus one], SDNN (root mean square of differences from mean RRi, divided by the number of RRi) and frequency domain methods. Power spectral components were reported at low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF) and as LF/HF ratio. ESR1 c.454-397T>C (rs2234693) and c.454-351A>G (rs9340799) polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction and fragment restriction analysis. RESULTS: The ESR1 T>C and A>G polymorphisms had no effect on HR, rMSSD, SDNN, LF, HF or LF/HF ratio (supine or sitting), independently of OC use. The ESR1 T-A, T-G, C-A and C-G haplotypes were not associated with HR, BP or HRV. CONCLUSIONS: ESR1 variants had no effect on the autonomic modulation of HR in young women users and nonusers of OC and may not be implicated in cardiovascular risk in young women.

Effect of low-dose combined oral contraceptive on aerobic capacity and anaerobic threshold level in active and sedentary young women.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term use of oral contraceptives (OC) containing 0.20 mg of ethinylestradiol (EE) combined with 0.15 mg of gestodene (GEST) on the peak aerobic capacity and at the anaerobic threshold (AT) level in active and sedentary young women. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-eight women (23+/-2.1 years old) were divided into four groups - active-OC (G1), active-NOC (G2), sedentary-OC (G3) and sedentary-NOC (G4) - and were submitted to a continuous ergospirometric incremental test on a cycloergometer with 20 to 25 W min(-1) increments. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Level of significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The OC use effect for the variables relative and absolute oxygen uptake VO(2) mL kg-(1) min(-1); VO(2), L min(-1), respectively), carbon dioxide output (VCO(2), L min(-1)), ventilation (VE, L min(-1)), heart rate (HR, bpm), respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and power output (W) data, as well as the interaction between OC use and exercise effect on the peak of test and at the AT level did not differ significantly between the active groups (G1 and G2) and the sedentary groups (G3 and G4). As to the exercise effect, for all variables studied, it was noted that the active groups presented higher values for the variables VO(2), VCO(2), VE and power output (p<.05) than the sedentary groups. The RER and HR were similar (p>.05) at the peak and at the AT level between G1 vs. G3 and G2 vs. G4. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of OC containing EE 0.20 mg plus GEST 0.15 mg does not affect aerobic capacity at the peak and at the AT level of exercise tests.