Positive Treatment Expectations Shape Perceived Medication Efficacy in a Translational Placebo Paradigm for the Gut-Brain Axis.

Placebo research has established the pivotal role of treatment expectations in shaping symptom experience and patient-reported treatment outcomes. Perceived treatment efficacy constitutes a relevant yet understudied aspect, especially in the context of the gut-brain axis with visceral pain as key symptom. Using a clinically relevant experimental model of visceral pain, we elucidated effects of pre-treatment expectations on post-treatment perceived treatment efficacy as an indicator of treatment satisfaction in a translational placebo intervention. We implemented positive suggestions regarding intravenous treatment with a spasmolytic drug (in reality saline), herein applied in combination with two series of individually calibrated rectal distensions in healthy volunteers. The first series used distension pressures inducing pain (pain phase). In the second series, pressures were surreptitiously reduced, modeling pain relief (pain relief phase). Using visual analog scales (VAS), expected and perceived treatment efficacy were assessed, along with perceived pain intensity. Manipulation checks supported that the induction of positive pre-treatment expectations and the modeling of pain relief were successful. Generalized Linear Models (GLM) were implemented to assess the role of inter-individual variability in positive pre-treatment expectations in perceived treatment efficacy and pain perception. GLM indicated no association between pre-treatment expectations and perceived treatment efficacy or perceived pain for the pain phase. For the relief phase, pre-treatment expectations (p = 0.024) as well as efficacy ratings assessed after the preceding pain phase (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with treatment efficacy assessed after the relief phase, together explaining 54% of the variance in perceived treatment efficacy. The association between pre-treatment expectations and perceived pain approached significance (p = 0.057) in the relief phase. Our data from an experimental translational placebo intervention in visceral pain support that reported post-treatment medication efficacy is shaped by pre-treatment expectations. The observation that individuals with higher positive expectations reported less pain and higher treatment satisfaction after pain relief may provide first evidence that perceived symptom improvement may facilitate treatment satisfaction. The immediate experience of symptoms within a given psychosocial treatment context may dynamically change perceptions about treatment, with implications for treatment satisfaction, compliance and adherence of patients with conditions of the gut-brain axis.

Impact of acute inflammation on the extinction of aversive gut memories.

Impaired extinction of pain-related fear memories can lead to persistent or resurging fear of pain, contributing to the development and maintenance of chronic pain conditions. The mechanisms underlying maladaptive pain-related learning and memory processes remain incompletely understood, particularly in the context of interoceptive, visceral pain. Inflammation is known to interfere with learning and memory, but its effects on the extinction of pain-related fear memories have never been tested. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we assessed the impact of experimental acute inflammation on the extinction and reinstatement of conditioned visceral pain-related fear. Forty healthy male volunteers underwent differential fear conditioning with visceral pain as clinically relevant unconditioned stimulus (US). Participants then received an intravenous injection of either 0.8 ng/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as inflammatory stimulus or physiological saline as placebo, and extinction training was conducted at the peak of the inflammatory response. Extinction recall and reinstatement test were performed after overnight consolidation. Results showed that visceral pain represents an effective US, eliciting pronounced conditioned pain-related fear responses. Repeated unreinforced presentation of the pain-predictive cue during extinction training resulted in full extinction of the conditioned behavioral response. However, unexpected re-exposure to the US during reinstatement test resulted in return of fear. Despite pronounced LPS-induced effects on inflammatory markers, cortisol, and negative affect, we did not find evidence that acute inflammation resulted in altered fear extinction. The findings support the notion that visceral pain-related fear learning establishes a robust aversive memory trace that remains preserved during inhibitory learning, leaving a latent vulnerability for the return of fear. Inflammation during inhibitory learning did neither weaken nor further amplify this aversive memory trace, suggesting that it is rather resistant to acute inflammation-induced effects, at least in healthy individuals with no additional vulnerability factors.

Stress burden and neuroendocrine regulation of cytokine production in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission.

Stress demonstrably contributes to disease course in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we investigated if neuroendocrine regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine production by peripheral blood immune cells is altered in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission (UCR). Using a whole blood stimulation assay, we measured the sensitivity of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α and IL-10 production to the glucocorticoid receptor agonist dexamethasone (DEX), the ß2-adrenergic receptor agonist terbutaline (TERB), and the α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist 3-[2,4-dimethoxy-benzylidene]-anabaseine (GTS-21) in UCR patients (N = 26) and in healthy controls (HC, N = 25). Additionally, we assessed anxiety and depression symptoms as well as chronic perceived stress and disease-specific quality of life. Results showed that UCR patients exhibited greater anxiety, depression and chronic stress levels than HC, and reduced disease-specific quality of life. Plasma concentrations of TNF-α, IL-8, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) were significantly higher, while LPS-induced IL-10 production was substantially lower in UCR compared to HC. Independent of group, DEX and GTS-21 dose-dependently inhibited TNF-α and IL-10 production, whereas TERB inhibited TNF-α and upregulated IL-10 production. However, at higher TERB doses (i.e., stress levels), upregulation of IL-10 production was significantly diminished in UCR compared to HC. Together, these findings demonstrate that downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production in peripheral blood immune cells through glucocorticoid, adrenergic, and cholinergic mechanisms is essentially normal in UC in clinical remission and as efficient as in healthy individuals. However, UCR patients exhibited signs of systemic low-grade inflammation and dysregulation of anti-inflammatory IL-10 production. Impaired adrenergic upregulation of IL-10 production during remission could be one mechanism how stress facilitates relapse and conversion to symptomatic disease in these patients.

Sex differences in the pro-inflammatory cytokine response to endotoxin unfold in vivo but not ex vivo in healthy humans.

Clinical data indicate that inflammatory responses differ across sexes, but the mechanisms remain elusive. Herein, we assessed in vivo and ex vivo cytokine responses to bacterial endotoxin in healthy men and women to elucidate the role of systemic and cellular factors underlying sex differences in inflammatory responses. Participants received an i.v. injection of low-dose endotoxin (0.4 ng/kg body mass), and plasma TNF-α and IL-6 responses were analyzed over a period of 6 h. In parallel, ex vivo cytokine production was measured in endotoxin-stimulated blood samples obtained immediately before in vivo endotoxin administration. As glucocorticoids (GCs) play an important role in the negative feedback regulation of the inflammatory response, we additionally analyzed plasma cortisol concentrations and ex vivo GC sensitivity of cytokine production. Results revealed greater in vivo pro-inflammatory responses in women compared with men, with significantly higher increases in plasma TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations. In addition, the endotoxin-induced rise in plasma cortisol was more pronounced in women. In contrast, no sex differences in ex vivo cytokine production and GC sensitivity were observed. Together, these findings demonstrate major differences in in vivo and ex vivo responses to endotoxin and underscore the importance of systemic factors underlying sex differences in the inflammatory response.

Inflammation-induced pain sensitization in men and women: does sex matter in experimental endotoxemia?

A role of the innate immune system is increasingly recognized as a mechanism contributing to pain sensitization. Experimental administration of the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) constitutes a model to study inflammation-induced pain sensitization, but all existing human evidence comes from male participants. We assessed visceral and musculoskeletal pain sensitivity after low-dose LPS administration in healthy men and women to test the hypothesis that women show greater LPS-induced hyperalgesia compared with men. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, healthy men (n = 20) and healthy women using oral contraceptives (n = 20) received an intravenous injection of 0.4 ng/kg body weight LPS or placebo. Pain sensitivity was assessed with established visceral and musculoskeletal pain models (ie, rectal pain thresholds; pressure pain thresholds for different muscle groups), together with a heartbeat perception (interoceptive accuracy) task. Plasma cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6) were measured along with state anxiety at baseline and up to 6-hour postinjection. Lipopolysaccharide application led to significant increases in plasma cytokines and state anxiety and decreased interoceptive awareness in men and women (P < 0.001, condition effects), with more pronounced LPS-induced cytokine increases in women (P < 0.05, interaction effects). Although both rectal and pressure pain thresholds were significantly decreased in the LPS condition (all P < 0.05, condition effect), no sex differences in endotoxin-induced sensitization were observed. In summary, LPS-induced systemic immune activation leads to visceral and musculoskeletal hyperalgesia, irrespective of biological sex. These findings support the broad applicability of experimental endotoxin administration as a translational preclinical model of inflammation-induced pain sensitization in both sexes.

Neural circuitry mediating inflammation-induced central pain amplification in human experimental endotoxemia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To elucidate the brain mechanisms underlying inflammation-induced visceral hyperalgesia in humans, in this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study we tested if intravenous administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) involves altered central processing of visceral pain stimuli. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled fMRI study, 26 healthy male subjects received either an intravenous injection of low-dose LPS (N=14, 0.4 ng/kg body weight) or placebo (N=12, control group). Plasma cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6), body temperature, plasma cortisol and mood were assessed at baseline and up to 6 h post-injection. At baseline and 2 h post-injection (test), rectal pain thresholds and painful rectal distension-induced blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses in brain regions-of-interest were assessed. To address specificity for visceral pain, BOLD responses to non-painful rectal distensions and painful somatic stimuli (i.e., punctuate mechanical stimulation) were also analyzed as control stimuli. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, LPS-treated subjects demonstrated significant and transient increases in TNF-α, IL-6, body temperature and cortisol, along with impaired mood. In response to LPS, rectal pain thresholds decreased in trend, along with enhanced up-regulation of rectal pain-induced BOLD responses within the posterior insula, dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC), anterior midcingulate (aMCC) and somatosensory cortices (all FWE-corrected p<0.05). Within the LPS group, more pronounced cytokine responses correlated significantly with enhanced rectal pain-induced neural activation in DLPFC and aMCC. No significant LPS effects were observed on neural responses to non-painful rectal distensions or mechanical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support that peripheral inflammatory processes affect visceral pain thresholds and the central processing of sensory-discriminative aspects of visceral pain.