Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 12(7): 12, 2023 07 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37428129

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To assess the clinical resolution capacities of a novel high-resolution optical coherence tomography (High-Res OCT). Methods: Eight healthy volunteers were included in this observational study. Using the SPECTRALIS High-Res OCT device (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg) macular b-scans were taken and compared with b-scans acquired with a SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT device (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg). High-Res OCT scans were also compared with hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from a human donor retina. Results: High-Res OCT allowed identification of several retinal structures at the cellular and subcellular levels, namely, cell nuclei of ganglion cells, displaced amacrine cells, cone photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelial cells compared with the commercial device. Rod photoreceptor nuclei were partially detectable. Localization of cell type-specific nuclei were confirmed by histological sections of human donor retina. Additionally, all three plexus of the retinal vasculature could be visualized. Conclusions: SPECTRALIS High-Res OCT device provides improved resolution compared with the conventional SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT device and allows to identify structures at the cellular level, similar to histological sections. Translational Relevance: High-Res OCT shows improved visualization of retinal structures in healthy individuals and can be used to assess individual cells within the retina.


Subject(s)
Retina , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Humans , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Retina/diagnostic imaging , Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells , Retinal Vessels
2.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther ; 43: 103673, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37380114

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the thickness of different macular retinal layers in glaucomatous eyes and healthy controls, and evaluate the diagnostic performance of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) parameters. METHODS: In this cross-sectional comparative study, 48 glaucomatous eyes and 44 healthy controls were included. The thickness of the total retina and all retinal layers were obtained using the Early Treatment Diagnostic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid. The minimal and average values of outer and inner ETDRS-rings were calculated. The diagnostic performance for detection of glaucoma was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The thickness of the total retina, ganglion cell layer (GCL), and inner-plexiform layer (IPL) was significantly thinner in glaucomatous eyes in all sectors except the center (all p<0.05). The thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was significantly thinner in the glaucoma group except in the center, nasal inner, and temporal outer sectors (all p<0.05). Layer thinning advanced with glaucoma severity. The minimal outer GCL thickness showed the highest AUC value for discrimination between glaucomatous eyes and healthy controls(0.955). The minimal outer IPL showed the highest AUC value for discriminating early-stage glaucomatous eyes from healthy controls (0.938). CONCLUSIONS: Glaucomatous eyes were found to have significant thinning in the macular region. GCL and IPL showed high ability to discriminate glaucomatous and early-stage glaucomatous eyes from controls. Applying the minimal value to the ETDRS grid has the potential to provide good diagnostic abilities in glaucoma screening.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma , Photochemotherapy , Humans , Retinal Ganglion Cells , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Photochemotherapy/methods , Photosensitizing Agents , Glaucoma/diagnostic imaging , ROC Curve
3.
Bone Jt Open ; 3(7): 557-565, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819309

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The frequency of severe femoral retroversion is unclear in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate mean femoral version (FV), the frequency of absolute femoral retroversion, and the combination of decreased FV and acetabular retroversion (AR) in symptomatic patients with FAI subtypes. METHODS: A retrospective institutional review board-approved observational study was performed with 333 symptomatic patients (384 hips) with hip pain due to FAI evaluated for hip preservation surgery. Overall, 142 patients (165 hips) had cam-type FAI, while 118 patients (137 hips) had mixed-type FAI. The allocation to each subgroup was based on reference values calculated on anteroposterior radiographs. CT/MRI-based measurement of FV (Murphy method) and AV were retrospectively compared among five FAI subgroups. Frequency of decreased FV < 10°, severely decreased FV < 5°, and absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°) was analyzed. RESULTS: A significantly (p < 0.001) lower mean FV was found in patients with cam-type FAI (15° (SD 10°)), and in patients with mixed-type FAI (17° (SD 11°)) compared to severe over-coverage (20° (SD 12°). Frequency of decreased FV < 10° was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in patients with cam-type FAI (28%, 46 hips) and in patients with over-coverage (29%, 11 hips) compared to severe over-coverage (12%, 5 hips). Absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°) was found in 13% (5 hips) of patients with over-coverage, 6% (10 hips) of patients with cam-type FAI, and 5% (7 hips) of patients with mixed-type FAI. The frequency of decreased FV< 10° combined with acetabular retroversion (AV < 10°) was 6% (8 hips) in patients with mixed-type FAI and 5% (20 hips) in all FAI patients. Of patients with over-coverage, 11% (4 hips) had decreased FV < 10° combined with acetabular retroversion (AV < 10°). CONCLUSION: Patients with cam-type FAI had a considerable proportion (28%) of decreased FV < 10° and 6% had absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°), even more for patients with pincer-type FAI due to over-coverage (29% and 13%). This could be important for patients evaluated for open hip preservation surgery or hip arthroscopy, and each patient requires careful personalized evaluation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):557-565.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...