Scores on the Safe Functional Motion test predict incident vertebral compression fracture.

UNLABELLED: The Safe Functional Motion test (SFM) was developed to document movement strategies used to perform everyday activities that may increase the risk for osteoporotic fracture. After adjusting for variables known to predict vertebral compression fracture (VCF), baseline score on the SFM was a significant independent predictor of incident VCF at 1- and 3-year follow-ups. INTRODUCTION: Functional movements may contribute to risk for VCF. We hypothesize that scores on the SFM, a performance-based test of physical function, are associated with incident VCF. METHODS: An osteoporosis clinic database was queried for men and women ≥ 50 years with an initial SFM and corresponding data for prevalent VCF, history of injurious falls, femoral neck bone mineral density (fnBMD), osteoporosis medication use, and incident morphometric VCF at 1-year (n = 878) and 3-year follow-ups (n = 503). Multiple logistic regressions, adjusted for gender, age, injurious fall(s), fnBMD, prevalent VCF at baseline, and osteoporosis medication use, were used to determine whether SFM score was associated with incident VCF at follow-up visits. RESULTS: Baseline SFM score was a significant independent predictor of incident VCF at 1-year follow-up (adjusted odds ratio (95 % confidence intervals (CI)) = 0.818 (0.707, 0.948); p < 0.008) and 3-year follow-up (adjusted odds ratio (95 % CI) = 0.728 (0.628, 0.844); p < 0.0001). Baseline fnBMD and osteoporosis medication use were significant predictors at 1-year (p = 0.05 and < 0.0001, respectively) and 3-year (p < 0.01 and 0.001, respectively) follow-ups. At 3-year follow-up, gender and prevalent VCF were also significant predictors (p = 0.003 and 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: For every 10-point increase in SFM score, the odds of future VCF decreases by 18 % at 1 year and 27 % at 3 years after adjusting for known covariates. The SFM may aid in the identification of modifiable functional risk factors for VCF.

The effect of teriparatide compared with risedronate on reduction of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

UNLABELLED: The effect of teriparatide and risedronate on back pain was tested, and there was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing a reduction in back pain between groups after 6 or 18 months. Patients receiving teriparatide had greater increases in bone mineral density and had fewer vertebral fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to understand the effect of teriparatide in reducing back pain in patients with prevalent back pain and vertebral fracture compared to risedronate. METHODS: In an 18-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we investigated the effects of teriparatide (20 µg/day) vs. risedronate (35 mg/week) in postmenopausal women with back pain likely due to vertebral fracture. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of subjects reporting ≥30% reduction in worst back pain severity from baseline to 6 months as assessed by a numeric rating scale in each treatment group. Pre-specified secondary and exploratory outcomes included assessments of average and worst back pain at additional time points, disability and quality of life, bone mineral density, incidence of fractures, and safety. RESULTS: At 6 months, 59% of teriparatide and 57% of risedronate patients reported ≥30% reduction in worst back pain and there were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients experiencing reduction in worst or average back pain at any time point, disability, or quality of life. There was a greater increase from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (p = 0.001) and femoral neck (p = 0.02) with teriparatide compared to risedronate and a lower incidence of vertebral fractures at 18 months (4% teriparatide and 9% risedronate; p = 0.01). Vertebral fractures were less severe (p = 0.04) in the teriparatide group. There was no difference in the overall incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in back pain-related endpoints, patients receiving teriparatide had greater skeletal benefit than those receiving risedronate.

Effects of teriparatide on serum calcium in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with raloxifene or alendronate.

UNLABELLED: The effect of teriparatide (20 microg/day) on serum calcium was examined in postmenopausal women previously treated with alendronate or raloxifene. Women previously treated with alendronate or raloxifene who added teriparatide or switched to teriparatide did not have clinically meaningful increases in mean predose serum calcium. INTRODUCTION: The effects of a 6-month treatment with teriparatide (20 microg/day; rhPTH(1-34), TPTD) on serum calcium (Ca) was examined in a prospective study of postmenopausal women previously treated with alendronate (70 mg/week or 10 mg/day [ALN] or raloxifene 60 mg/d [RLX]) for > or =18 months. METHODS: Women continued their usual ALN or RLX during a 2-month antiresorptive phase. Women previously treated with ALN were randomized to add TPTD (n = 52) or switch to TPTD (n = 50) and women previously treated with RLX were randomized to add TPTD (n = 47) or switch to TPTD (n = 49). All were to take at least 500 mg/day of elemental Ca and 400-800 IU/day of vitamin D. RESULTS: Predose mean serum Ca did not significantly change in groups adding TPTD to either RLX or ALN treatment. In patients who switched from RLX or ALN to TPTD, mean serum Ca increased by 0.05 mmol/L and 0.04 mmol/L respectively. Only 1 patient had the predefined calcium endpoint of serum calcium > 2.76 mmol/L (11 mg/dL) at more than one visit. CONCLUSIONS: Women previously treated with ALN or RLX who added TPTD or switched to TPTD did not have clinically meaningful increases in mean predose serum Ca.