Phase II study of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion to patients with recurrent malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with recurrent malignant glioma following radiation therapy, who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen and who had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 60, were treated with a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel every 3 weeks. The initial dose was 210 mg/m2; dose escalation to 240 mg/m2 was allowed. Tumor response was assessed at 6-week intervals using radiographic and clinical criteria. Treatment was continued until documented tumor progression or a total of 12 paclitaxel infusions. RESULTS: Of 41 eligible patients, all were assessable for treatment toxicity and 40 (98%) were assessable for response. The response rate (disease stabilization or better) was 35%. Twenty-nine patients (71%) underwent dose escalation to 240 mg/m2 without the use of growth factors. Toxicities included alopecia (98%), nausea (22%), arthralgias (32%), CNS toxicity (24%), peripheral neuropathy (15%), cardiac toxicity (7%), and myelosuppression (10% grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity). No patient developed febrile neutropenia. There was one allergic reaction (2%). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel is well tolerated at this dose schedule in patients with recurrent malignant glioma, and affords a modest response rate. Because minimal myelotoxicity was encountered in our patients, a dose-escalating phase I/II study of paclitaxel is planned to determine the maximal-tolerated dose (MTD).

Randomized trial of vitamin A versus observation as adjuvant therapy in high-risk primary malignant melanoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: A national cooperative group trial was conducted in patients with early-stage cutaneous malignant melanoma to determine if oral vitamin A can increase disease-free survival or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-eight patients with completely resected melanoma of Breslow's thickness greater than 0.75 mm and clinically negative lymph nodes were randomized to oral vitamin A (100,000 IU/d) for 18 months or to observation. Patients were stratified by Breslow's thickness of primary lesion (0.76 to 1.50 mm, 1.51 to 3.00 mm, or > 3.00 mm), sex, and type of therapy (excision, excision plus node dissection, excision plus perfusion, or excision plus both). The median duration of follow-up observation of living patients is greater than 8 years. The relative risk (RR) in disease-free survival and overall survival in the treatment compared with the observation group was calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Overall, there was no difference in disease-free survival or overall survival between the two groups. Examination of treatment by stratification interactions and subset analysis did not show any treatment-effect differences based on sex or type of therapy. There was also no difference between groups in disease-free survival based on Breslow's thickness of the primary lesion. Overall, 12% of patients who received vitamin A experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Based on the lack of overall survival benefit, further evaluation of vitamin A as adjuvant therapy for melanoma does not appear warranted.

Twenty-four hour blood pressure effect of once-daily lisinopril, enalapril, and placebo in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

This multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study compared the antihypertensive effects of equal doses of two long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. After a two-week, placebo run-in phase, 110 patients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomised to receive 10 mg lisinopril or enalapril, or placebo for 4 weeks. Office BPs were measured at regular intervals throughout the study. Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was measured at baseline and after the first and final doses of study drug. Serum ACE activity and aldosterone were obtained concomitantly with each ABP monitoring. Office BP differences from placebo reached (P less than 0.05) or approached (P less than 0.10) statistical significance at all observations for the lisinopril group but were not significant for any observation in the enalapril group and approached significance on two occasions. After four weeks of treatment, ABP analysis revealed that the lisinopril and enalapril groups, when compared with placebo, had similar and significant systolic and diastolic AUC reductions (P less than 0.01) from baseline over the 24 h dosing interval. During the second half of the dosing interval, 13-24 h post drug administration, the lisinopril group was significantly different from placebo (systolic BP, P = 0.002; diastolic BP, P = 0.005) while the enalapril group was not. Both drugs were well tolerated. The results indicate that monotherapy with 10 mg of lisinopril is as effective as with 10 mg of enalapril, and that ABP monitoring is useful in more precisely depicting the clinical effect of the known pharmacokinetic properties of these two agents.