ABSTRACT
Background: In 2014, Ozaki et al. introduced the neo-cuspidation (Ozaki procedure), a new valve from the pericardium, to reduce or even prevent the risk of chronic autoimmune inflammation and subsequent rejection or valve degeneration. Thus, the authors aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Ozaki technique in treating aortic valve diseases. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was performed via PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Web of Science up to 20 February 2022. Random-effects meta-analysis models were employed to estimate the pooled mean and SD or event to the total of the Ozaki procedure. Relevant records were retrieved and analyzed by OpenMeta analyst software. Results: A total of 2863 patients from 21 studies were finally included in our analysis. Ac. Ozaki technique showed statistical significance in terms of mean cardiopulmonary bypass time of 148 mins (95% CI 144-152.2, P<0.001), mean aortic cross-clamp time of 112.46 mins (95% CI 105.116, 119.823, P<0.001), reoperation with a low risk of 0.011 (95% CI 0.005, 0.016, P=0.047), conversion to aortic valve replacement with a low risk of 0.004 (95% CI -0.001, 0.008, P=0.392), finally ICU stay (days) and hospital length of stay (days) with a mean of 2.061 days (95% CI 1.535, 2.587, P<0.001) and 8.159 days (95% CI 7.183-9.855, P<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The Ozaki procedure provides a safe surgical technique with low mean cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time; moreover, a mean of 2-day-postoperative hospital stay was observed with the Ozaki procedure with a low risk of conversion to aortic valve replacement, reoperation, ICU and hospital stay, and death.
ABSTRACT
Patients with severe uncontrolled asthma still experience acute asthma symptoms and exacerbations, particularly those with non-eosinophilic inflammation who take the maximum amount of standard drug therapy. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody, can improve lung function and enhance control of asthma symptoms in those patients, regardless of the disease's baseline characteristics. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of using tezepelumab in controlling severe symptoms of uncontrolled asthma. We performed a comprehensive literature search in several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrial.gov, using a well-established search strategy to include all relevant publications. According to our inclusion criteria, we searched for randomized controlled trials comparing tezepelumab versus placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. We analyzed the data using The Revman 5.4 program software. The search identified 589 potential articles. After excluding studies inconsistent with selection criteria, four studies were included and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The pooled effect demonstrated the better performance of tezepelumab over the placebo regarding the decrease in annualized asthma exacerbation rate (MD = - 0.74, (95% CI [- 1.04, - 0.44], p < 0.00001)), asthma control questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) Score MD = - 0.32, (95% CI [- 0.43, - 0.21], p < 0.00001)), blood eosinophil count (MD = - 139.38 cells/mcL, (95% CI [- 150.37, - 128.39], p < 0.00001)), feNO (MD = - 10 ppb, (95% CI [- 15.81, - 4.18], p = 0.0008)) and serum total IgE (MD = - 123.51 UI/ml, (95% CI [- 206.52, - 40.50], p = 0.004)). All tezepelumab groups had higher pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s than the placebo group (MD = 0.16, (95% CI [0.10, 0.21], p < 0.00001)). Higher efficacy and safety profile was detected for tezepelumab to control the exacerbations of severe uncontrolled adult asthmatics.
