Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Biomech ; 171: 112181, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852481

ABSTRACT

Neck pain and injuries are growing healthcare burdens with women having a higher incidence rate and poorer treatment outcomes than males. A better understanding of sex differences in neck biomechanics, foundational for more targeted, effective prevention or treatment strategies, calls for more advanced subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling. Current neck musculoskeletal models are based on generic anatomy, lack subject specificity beyond anthropometric scaling, and are unable to accurately reproduce neck strengths exhibited in vivo without arbitrary muscle force scaling factors or residual torque actuators. In this work, subject-specific neck musculoskeletal models of 23 individuals (11 male, 12 female) were constructed by integrating multi-modality imaging and biomechanical measurements. Each model simulated maximal voluntary neck static exertions in three postures: neck flexion in a neutral posture, flexion in a 40° extended posture, and extension in a 40° flexed posture. Quantitative model validation showed close agreement between model-predicted muscle activation and EMG measurement. The models unveiled that (1) males have greater moment arms in one flexor muscle group and five extensor muscle groups, (2) females exhibited higher cervical spinal compression per unit exertion force in the flexed posture, and (3) the variability of compression force was much greater in females in all three exertions but most notably in the extension with a flexed "dropped head" position. These insights illuminated a plausible pathway from sex differences in neck biomechanics to sex disparities in the risk and prevalence of neck pain.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Humans , Male , Female , Cervical Vertebrae/physiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Neck Muscles/physiology , Posture/physiology , Sex Characteristics , Neck/physiology , Models, Biological , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Electromyography
2.
Ergonomics ; 67(2): 182-193, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37204270

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to establish an ambulatory field-friendly system based on miniaturised wireless flexible sensors for studying the biomechanics of human-exoskeleton interactions. Twelve healthy adults performed symmetric lifting with and without a passive low-back exoskeleton, while their movements were tracked using both a flexible sensor system and a conventional motion capture (MoCap) system synchronously. Novel algorithms were developed to convert the raw acceleration, gyroscope, and biopotential signals from the flexible sensors into kinematic and dynamic measures. Results showed that these measures were highly correlated with those obtained from the MoCap system and discerned the effects of the exoskeleton, including increased peak lumbar flexion, decreased peak hip flexion, and decreased lumbar flexion moment and back muscle activities. The study demonstrated the promise of an integrated flexible sensor-based system for biomechanics and ergonomics field studies as well as the efficacy of exoskeleton in relieving the low-back stress associated with manual lifting.


This study established and tested a flexible sensor-based ambulatory system for biomechanical evaluation of human-exoskeleton interactions and as a promising new tool for field ergonomics studies in practical or naturalistic settings.Abbreviations: MoCap: motion capture; WMSD: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders; EMG: electromyography; IMU: inertial measurement unit; TES: thoracic erector spinae; LES: lumbar erector spinae; WITH: tasks performed with wearing the exoskeleton; WITHOUT: tasks performed without wearing the exoskeleton; RMS: root mean square; RMSE: root-mean-square error; r: Pearson's correlation coefficient; ASIS: anterior superior iliac spine.


Subject(s)
Back Muscles , Exoskeleton Device , Organothiophosphates , Adult , Humans , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Electromyography/methods , Lifting , Back Muscles/physiology , Biomechanical Phenomena
3.
Hum Factors ; 64(6): 1013-1026, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33504206

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to establish a normative database of neck strength and endurance while exploring personal and work-related factors that can significantly influence neck strength and endurance. BACKGROUND: A normative database combining both neck strength and endurance and delineating how they are affected by personal and work-related factors is currently lacking. It is needed for the development of tools and guidelines for designing work requiring head-neck exertions to contain the risk of occupational neck pain. METHODS: Forty healthy participants (20 males and 20 females) performed sustained-till-exhaustion head-neck exertions, while seated, at 50% and 100% of their maximal efforts in anterior, anterior-superior, and posterior-superior directions in neutral, 40° extended, and 40° flexed neck postures. Exertion force and endurance time data from 38 participants were recorded and analyzed using regression models. RESULTS: Overall, multiple regression analyses of the neck strength and endurance database revealed that head-neck posture is the most significant determinant of both neck strength and endurance. The time of day significantly influenced neck endurance. Among the personal factors, a significant sex effect on neck strength and significant age and body mass index (BMI) effects on neck endurance were identified. CONCLUSION: The work-related factors play a more significant role in shaping both neck strength and endurance than personal factors and therefore are more important modifiable factors in meeting the physical demands of work. APPLICATION: The study findings can aid in work design as well as in pre-employment screening to reduce the incidence of neck pain in the workplace.


Subject(s)
Neck Pain , Physical Endurance , Female , Head , Humans , Male , Neck , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Posture
4.
J Biomech ; 127: 110660, 2021 10 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34364186

ABSTRACT

Neck muscle size and strength have been linked to lower injury risk and reduced pain. However, prior findings have been inconclusive and have failed to clarify whether there are sex differences in neck muscle size-strength relationships. Such differences may point to an underlying cause for the reported sex difference in neck pain prevalence. Thirty participants (13 males, 17 females) who underwent neck strength testing and MR imaging were analyzed. Strength was measured in three conditions that differed in posture and exertion direction. Muscle size was quantified by three metrics: anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSA), muscle volume (MV), and an estimate of physiological cross-sectional area-reconstruction-based cross-sectional area (RCSA). Inter-posture strength correlations, muscle size-strength correlations, and sex differences were analyzed with linear regression. Males were approximately 65% stronger and had significantly larger muscles. Strength varied significantly across postures, but only female strength values for different postures were significantly correlated. Observed in males only, the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) was a strong predictor of flexion strength in the neutral posture while the anterior scalene (AS) was more involved in the extended. No extensor's size was significantly linked to extension strength. A greater amount of force variation is unexplained by muscle size alone in females than in males. Males and females exhibited distinct size-strength relationships, highlighting the need for sex-specific models and analyses and the greater potential effect of non-morphometric factors on force generating capacity in females. No advantage of one muscle size metric over another in strength prediction was evidenced.


Subject(s)
Neck Muscles , Posture , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength , Neck , Neck Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Range of Motion, Articular
5.
Cell Rep ; 33(10): 108445, 2020 12 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33242407

ABSTRACT

Understanding the effects of microgravity on human organs is crucial to exploration of low-earth orbit, the moon, and beyond. Drosophila can be sent to space in large numbers to examine the effects of microgravity on heart structure and function, which is fundamentally conserved from flies to humans. Flies reared in microgravity exhibit cardiac constriction with myofibrillar remodeling and diminished output. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in isolated hearts revealed reduced expression of sarcomeric/extracellular matrix (ECM) genes and dramatically increased proteasomal gene expression, consistent with the observed compromised, smaller hearts and suggesting abnormal proteostasis. This was examined further on a second flight in which we found dramatically elevated proteasome aggregates co-localizing with increased amyloid and polyQ deposits. Remarkably, in long-QT causing sei/hERG mutants, proteasomal gene expression at 1g, although less than the wild-type expression, was nevertheless increased in microgravity. Therefore, cardiac remodeling and proteostatic stress may be a fundamental response of heart muscle to microgravity.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Contraction/physiology , Myocardium/pathology , Weightlessness/adverse effects , Animals , Atrial Remodeling/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Extracellular Matrix/genetics , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Gene Expression/genetics , Gene Expression/physiology , Heart/physiology , Models, Animal , Myocardium/metabolism , Sarcomeres/genetics , Sarcomeres/metabolism , Ventricular Remodeling/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...