Association of 24 h Blood Pressure on Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Post Intravenous Thrombolysis.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated admission blood pressure (BP) and BP variability have been shown to be associated with poor outcomes in most studies, while few studies have not found such an association. We investigated the association of various BP parameters with 3-month functional outcomes, mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). METHODS: Patients with AIS who received IVT between January 2012 and March 2020 were analyzed. Admission BP, 24 h mean BP, and BP variability were noted for all patients. Outcomes assessed were 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality, and sICH. RESULTS: Of the 237 patients, 161 were males. The mean admission systolic BP (SBP), 24 h mean SBP, and BP variability were 158.1 mm Hg (SD 30.25), 138 mm Hg (SD 16.78), 19.42 (SD 12.79), respectively. At 3 months, 147 (62%) patients had a good outcome (mRS 0-2). Multivariate analysis showed prior stroke, NIHSS >15, mean SBP ≥160 mm Hg, and SBP variability >45 to be significant predictors of poor outcome (mRS > 2) at 3 months. Eleven patients (4.6%) developed sICH. Age more than 60 years, presence of atrial fibrillation, admission blood sugar ≥180 mg/Dl, and SBP variability >45 predicted sICH. None of the above factors were predictive of 3-month mortality. CONCLUSION: An elevated mean SBP and greater SBP variability were predictive of poor functional outcomes, whereas a high SBP variability predicted sICH. Our study emphasizes the need for BP control and minimizing large fluctuations to achieve good poststroke outcomes.

Clinical profile and outcome of non-COVID strokes during pandemic and the pre pandemic period: COVID-Stroke Study Group (CSSG) India.

BACKGROUND: As the health systems around the world struggled to meet the challenges of COVID-19 pandemic, care of many non-COVID emergencies was affected. AIMS: The present study examined differences in the diagnosis, evaluation and management of stroke patients during a defined period in the ongoing pandemic in 2020 when compared to a similar epoch in year 2019. METHODS: The COVID stroke study group (CSSG) India, included 18 stroke centres spread across the country. Data was collected prospectively between February and July 2020 and retrospectively for the same period in 2019. Details of demographics, stroke evaluation, treatment, in-hospital and three months outcomes were collected and compared between these two time points. RESULTS: A total of 2549 patients were seen in both study periods; 1237 patients (48.53%) in 2019 and 1312 (51.47%) in 2020. Although the overall number of stroke patients and rates of thrombolysis were comparable, a significant decline was observed in the month of April 2020, during the initial period of the pandemic and lockdown. Endovascular treatment reduced significantly and longer door to needle and CT to needle times were observed in 2020. Although mortality was higher in 2020, proportion of patients with good outcome were similar in both the study periods. CONCLUSIONS: Although stroke admissions and rates of thrombolysis were comparable, some work flow metrics were delayed, endovascular stroke treatment rates declined and mortality was higher during the pandemic study period. Reorganization of stroke treatment pathways during the pandemic has likely improved the stroke care delivery across the globe.