Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transl Anim Sci ; 6(4): txac144, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36425846

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effects of novel silage inoculants containing lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and fibrolytic enzymes on ensiling, aerobic stability (AS), and the performance of growing beef cattle. Whole-plant corn forage was either uninoculated (CON) or inoculated with a mixture of LAB containing (cfu g-1 fresh forage) 1.5 × 105 L. hilgardii (CNCM I-4785), 1.5 × 105 L. buchneri (NCIMB 40788) and 1.0 × 105 P. pentosaceus (NCIMB 12455) for a total of 4.0 × 105 cfu g-1 fresh forage LAB (IB), or a combination of IB plus fibrolytic enzymes (xylanase + ß-glucanase) (IC). All treatments were ensiled in mini-silos, whereas CON and IC were also ensiled in silo bags for the growth performance study. Total bacteria (TB) counts were lower (P = 0.02) for IC than CON after 14 d of ensiling, whereas TB counts of IC and IB were greater (P ≤ 0.01) than CON after 60 d of ensiling in mini-silos. The LAB in IC and IB ensiled in mini-silos were greater than CON on d 60 (P ≤ 0.01) and 90 (P ≤ 0.001) of ensiling and after 3 d (P ≤ 0.01) of aerobic exposure (AE). Silage pH of IC ensiled in silo bags was lower than CON on d 3 (P < 0.01), 7 (P < 0.001), and 14 (P = 0.02) of AE. Yeast counts were lower for IC than CON in terminal silage (P < 0.001), and after 3 (P < 0.001) and 7 d (P < 0.01) of AE. Acetate (AC) concentrations were higher (P ≤ 0.02) for IC than CON throughout AE, whereas lactate (LA) concentrations of IC were greater than CON on d 3 (P < 0.001), 7 (P < 0.01), and 14 (P < 0.001) of AE. Greater AC concentration and lower yeast counts resulted in greater (P < 0.001) stability for IC ensiled in silo bags than CON after 14 d of AE. Growth performance of steers was similar (P > 0.05) as the nutrient composition of silage was similar across diets. Improved AS of IC could potentially have a greater impact on DMI, production efficiency, and growth performance in large-scale commercial feedlot operations where silage at the silo face may be exposed to air for longer periods of time.

2.
Sci Total Environ ; 812: 152267, 2022 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34902397

ABSTRACT

Biochar in ruminant diets is being assessed as a method for simultaneously improving animal production and reducing enteric CH4 emissions, but little is known about subsequent biochar-manure interactions post-excretion. We examined chemical properties, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and organic matter (OM) composition during farm scale stockpiling (SP) or composting (CP) of manure from cattle that either received a pine-based biochar in their diet (BM) or did not (RM). Manure piles were monitored hourly for temperature and weekly for top surface CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes over 90 d in a semiarid location near Lethbridge, AB, Canada. Results indicate that cumulative CO2, N2O and CH4 emissions were not affected by biochar, implying that BM was as labile as RM. The pH, total C (TC), NO3-N and Olsen P were also not influenced by biochar, although it was observed that NH4-N and OM extractability were both 13% lower in BM than RM. Solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) showed that biochar increased stockpile/compost aromaticity, yet it did not alter the bulk C speciation of manure OM. Further analysis by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) revealed that dissolved OM was enriched by strongly reduced chemical constituents, with BM providing more humic-like OM precursors than RM. Inclusion of a pine-based biochar in cattle diets to generate BM is consistent with current trends in the circular economy, "closing the loop" in agricultural supply chains by returning C-rich organic amendments to croplands. Stockpiling/composting the resulting BM, however, may not provide a clear advantage over directly mixing low levels of biochar with manure. Further research is required to validate BM as a tool to reduce the C footprint of livestock waste management.


Subject(s)
Greenhouse Gases , Manure , Animals , Cattle , Charcoal , Greenhouse Gases/analysis , Methane/analysis , Nitrous Oxide/analysis , Nutrients , Soil
3.
J Environ Manage ; 280: 111705, 2021 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298390

ABSTRACT

The use of biochar (BC) in feedlot cattle diets has recently been explored as an approach to simultaneously improving animal production and reducing enteric methane (CH4) emissions. This study examines the impact of BC on manure properties and whether BC affects manure composition and carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) outputs from feedlot steers offered a barley-based diet with BC at 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0% (BC0, BC0.5, BC1 and BC2) of diet dry matter. Manure was sampled three times over a 235 day feeding trial conducted in southern Alberta, Canada. Results showed that BC2 increased total C and the C/N ratio by 5.7 and 6.6% relative to BC0, respectively (P < 0.05), while total N exhibited a quadratic response from BC0 to BC2 (P = 0.005). Manure 15δN signatures, ranging from +3.83 to +7.34‰, were not affected (P > 0.05) by BC treatment. DPMAS 13C NMR revealed similar structural features among BC0 and BC2; indigestible BC had a minor impact on the bulk-C speciation of manure organic matter (OM). Compositional changes were limited to the aromatic-C region of the 13C NMR spectra. Fused-ring domains, mainly pyrogenic-C, were increased by 1.56-fold at BC2 relative to BC0. Overall, results demonstrated that BC stabilizes recalcitrant-C in manure OM, potentially sequestering soil-C when applied to croplands. This approach provides an added value to its use in ruminant diets, mainly from a nutrient cycling perspective. However, whole-farm studies are further required to validate the incorporation of BC into beef production systems.


Subject(s)
Charcoal , Manure , Alberta , Animals , Cattle , Isotopes , Methane , Nitrogen/analysis
4.
Transl Anim Sci ; 4(2): 831-838, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32734143

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of enhanced biochar (EB) on growth performance, carcass quality, and feeding behavior of feedlot steers fed high-forage and high-grain diets. A total of 160 crossbred steers (initial 286 ± 26 kg body weight [BW]) were blocked by BW and randomly assigned to 16 pens (10 steers per pen), 8 of which were equipped with the GrowSafe system for monitoring feeding behavior. Treatments were EB included in the diet at 0% (control), 0.5%, 1.0%, or 2.0% (dry matter [DM] basis) with four pens per treatment. The backgrounding phase (84 d) was divided into four 21-d periods, and the finishing phase (112 d) was divided into four 28-d periods, with a 28-d transition period for dietary adaptation. Pen was the experimental unit for all parameters except for feeding behavior, where steer was considered the experimental unit. Treatment was included as a fixed effect, and period was considered a repeated measure. Total weight gain and overall average daily gain (ADG) tended to decrease (P = 0.06) with 2.0% EB. There was no effect (P ≥ 0.13) of EB on dry matter intake (DMI), gain-to-feed ratio (G:F), net energy for gain, ADG, or final BW for the backgrounding or finishing phases. There was a treatment × period effect (P < 0.05) of EB on DMI, ADG, and G:F for both backgrounding and finishing phases. Hot carcass weight, dressing %, back fat, rib-eye area, and meat yield were not affected (P ≥ 0.26) by EB. Lean meat yield was increased (P = 0.03) by 2.0% EB compared to all other treatments. Compared to the control, 2.0% EB increased (P = 0.02) the number of carcasses that achieved Canada 1 grade. More (P = 0.05) carcasses from control steers were graded as Canada 3 as compared to those fed 0.5% or 2.0% EB. Quality grade and incidences of liver abscesses were not affected (P ≥ 0.44) by EB. Enhanced biochar had no effect (P ≥ 0.11) on feeding behavior during backgrounding or finishing phases. In conclusion, EB did not result in changes in growth rate, feed efficiency, or feeding behavior in feedlot cattle, but 2.0% EB increased lean carcass yield grade.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...