Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Contam Hydrol ; 67(1-4): 113-32, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14607473

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted at Canadian Forces Base Borden (CFB Borden) to assess the air distribution from a single in situ air sparging injection point. This aquifer consists of fine to medium sand deposited in horizontal layers. The permeability at the study location varied from 10(-10) to 10(-14) m2 and distinct low permeability horizons were present at approximately 1.2, 2.0, and 2.9 m below the water table. Prior to air injection, a 15x15-m portion of the vadose zone was excavated to the water table (approximately 1 m below ground surface) in order to visually observe air release distribution at the water table. The water table was actively maintained 5 cm above the excavated surface. The sparging system operated for a period of 7 days with an injection flow rate of 200 m3/days (5 scfm). The resulting subsurface air distribution was assessed using a variety of techniques including neutron logging, borehole and surface ground penetrating radar, piezometric head measurements, surface visualization, and hydraulic testing. Through this combination of tests, it was demonstrated that variations in permeability and, hence, capillary pressure at the site were sufficient to cause the injected air to spread laterally, forming stratigraphically trapped air pockets beneath the low permeability horizons. The formation of these air pockets eventually resulted in a buildup of capillary pressure that exceeded the air entry pressure and allowed some air to migrate up through the lower permeability layers. Each of the assessment techniques employed generated information at different spatial scales that prevented a direct comparison of the results from the various techniques; however, the results from all techniques proved to be critical in the interpretation of the experimental data. As a consequence, the different assessment techniques should not be viewed as alternatives, but rather as complimentary techniques.


Subject(s)
Soil , Water Supply , Air , Air Movements , Environmental Monitoring , Environmental Pollution/prevention & control , Permeability , Pressure , Volatilization , Water Movements
2.
Appl Opt ; 12(5): 947-9, 1973 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20125449
4.
Appl Opt ; 10(10): 2362-4, 1971 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20111331
6.
J Physiol ; 202(1): 16P, 1969 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5770878
9.
Nature ; 220(5162): 58-60, 1968 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5677443
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...