ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Influenza may trigger complications, particularly in at-risk groups, potentially leading to hospitalization or death. However, due to lack of routine testing, influenza cases are infrequently coded with influenza-specific diagnosis. Statistical models using influenza activity as an explanatory variable can be used to estimate annual hospitalizations and deaths associated with influenza. Our study aimed to estimate the clinical and economic burden of severe influenza in Spain, considering such models. METHODS: The study comprised ten epidemic seasons (2008/2009-2017/2018) and used two approaches: (i) a direct method of estimating the seasonal influenza hospitalization, based on the number of National Health Service hospitalizations with influenza-specific International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes (ICD-9: 487-488; ICD-10: J09-J11), as primary or secondary diagnosis; (ii) an indirect method of estimating excess hospitalizations and deaths using broader groups of ICD codes in time-series models, computed for six age groups and four groups of diagnoses: pneumonia or influenza (ICD-9: 480-488, 517.1; ICD-10: J09-J18), respiratory (ICD-9: 460-519; ICD-10: J00-J99), respiratory or cardiovascular (C&R, ICD-9: 390-459, 460-519; ICD-10: I00-I99, J00-J99), and all-cause. Means, excluding the H1N1pdm09 pandemic (2009/2010), are reported in this study. RESULTS: The mean number of hospitalizations with a diagnosis of influenza per season was 13,063, corresponding to 28.1 cases per 100,000 people. The mean direct annual cost of these hospitalizations was 45.7 million, of which 65.7% was generated by patients with comorbidities. Mean annual influenza-associated C&R hospitalizations were estimated at 34,894 (min: 16,546; max: 52,861), corresponding to 75.0 cases per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.3-86.3) for all ages and 335.3 (95% CI: 293.2-377.5) in patients aged ≥ 65 years. We estimate 3.8 influenza-associated excess C&R hospitalizations for each hospitalization coded with an influenza-specific diagnosis in patients aged ≥ 65 years. The mean direct annual cost of the estimated excess C&R hospitalizations was 142.9 million for all ages and 115.9 million for patients aged ≥ 65 years. Mean annual influenza-associated all-cause mortality per 100,000 people was estimated at 27.7 for all ages. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a relevant under-detected burden of influenza mostly in the elderly population, but not neglectable in younger people.
Subject(s)
Influenza, Human , Aged , Humans , Seasons , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Spain , State Medicine , Hospitalization , PandemicsABSTRACT
There is accumulating evidence showing that influenza infection and cardiorespiratory diseases are closely associated. Influenza has been described as a triggering factor capable of both exacerbate underlying chronic diseases as well as inducing the appearance of new respiratory and cardiovascular events. Consequently, influenza infection and its associated comorbidity have a significant impact on the health system. In this document, we extensively reviewed the current literature to describe the most relevant data on the relationship between influenza infection and cardiorespiratory diseases. Likewise, we analyzed the possible pathophysiological mechanisms explaining the connection between influenza infection and cardiac and respiratory events. Finally, reviewed data has been put into perspective to highlight the importance of influenza vaccination as an effective measure in the prevention of cardiorespiratory diseases, especially in the population with underlying chronic diseases.
Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Comorbidity , Humans , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , VaccinationABSTRACT
Adults aged 65 years or older suffer the most severe health effects of seasonal flu. Although the influenza vaccine is effective in preventing influenza virus infection and its complications, it is not as effective in the elderly due to age-associated immunosenescence phenomenon. Since 2009, a high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine has been approved in the United States for the immunization of people ≥ 65 years with an antigen concentration four times higher than the standard vaccine. Multiple clinical trials carried out over different seasons, and using different methodologies, have shown that the high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine is not only more effective, but it also has a similar safety profile and is more immunogenic than the standard dose vaccine in the prevention of flu and its complications in the elderly. This document reviews the current scientific evidence on the safety and immunogenicity of high-dose influenza vaccine in people aged 65 years and over, and includes information from randomized clinical trials, observational studies with data from real clinical practice, and systematic reviews, and meta-analysis.
Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Adult , Aged , Antibody Formation , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , VaccinationABSTRACT
Seasonal influenza is a major public health problem, particularly in older people. Influenza vaccine is the most effective way to prevent influenza virus infection and its complications, but due to immunosenescence, older people do not respond efficiently to immunization. In 2009, a high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3-HD), containing four times more antigen than the standard-dose vaccine, was approved in the United States for the immunization of people aged 65 years and over. Numerous clinical trials, carried out at different seasons and using different methodologies, have shown that the IIV3-HD vaccine is, as well as safe, more immunogenic and more effective than the standard-dose vaccine in preventing influenza virus infection and its complications in older people. This paper reviews the available evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of the IIV3-HD influenza vaccine in the elderly, with information from randomized clinical trials, as well as observational studies of real-world clinical practice and in systematic reviews/meta-analyses.
Subject(s)
Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Aged , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunologyABSTRACT
Objective: To advance the development of an ideal and sustainable framework agreement for the public procurement of vaccines in Spain, and to agree on the desirable award criteria and their relative weight. Methods: A multidisciplinary committee of seven health-care professionals and managers developed a partial multi-criteria decision analysis to determine the award criteria that should be considered and their specific weights for the public procurement of routine vaccines and seasonal influenza vaccines, considering their legal viability. A re-test of the results was carried out. The current situation was analyzed through 118 tender specifications and compared to the ideal framework. Results: Price is the prevailing award criterion for the public procurement of both routine (weighting of 60% versus 40% for all other criteria) and influenza (36% versus 64%) vaccines. Ideally, 22 criteria should be considered for routine vaccines, grouped and weighted into five domains: efficacy (weighting of 29%), economic aspects (27%), vaccine characteristics (22%), presentation form and packaging (13%), and others (9%). Per criteria set, price was the most important criterion (22%), followed by effectiveness (9%), and composition/formulation (7%). Regarding influenza vaccines, 20 criteria were selected, grouped, and weighted: efficacy (29%), economic aspects (25%), vaccine characteristics (20%), presentation form and packaging (16%), and others (11%). Per criteria set, price was also the most relevant criterion (19%), followed by composition/formulation (8%), and effectiveness (8%). Conclusions: Contrary to the current approach, technical award criteria should prevail over economic criteria in an ideal and sustainable framework agreement for the public procurement of vaccines.
Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Spain , VaccinationABSTRACT
Es conocida la relación bidireccional entre enfermedades infecciosas y diabetes. Las personas con diabetes tienen mayor riesgo de presentar enfermedades infecciosas, pudiendo ser estas de mayor severidad; y por otro lado, las enfermedades infecciosas desestabilizan el control metabólico de las personas con diabetes. El envejecimiento importante de la población es debido en parte al aumento de la supervivencia de pacientes con enfermedades crónicas, entre ellas la diabetes. Mejorar la prevención de enfermedades infecciosas en este grupo de población podría disminuir las complicaciones de estas enfermedades, así como las consecuencias de la desestabilización de la enfermedad de base (morbilidad, discapacidad, ingresos hospitalarios, costes sanitarios, tasas de mortalidad), mejorando además la calidad de vida de las personas con diabetes. La presente revisión expone el tratamiento de las enfermedades infecciosas en personas con diabetes y el abordaje de las enfermedades inmunoprevenibles con las vacunas recomendadas en la actualidad
The bidirectional relationship between infectious diseases and diabetes is well-known. On the one hand, diabetes patients are at a higher risk of presenting with infectious diseases, possibly with more severity, and on the other hand, infectious diseases impair metabolic control in patients with diabetes. Population ageing arises partly due to an increased survival rate in chronic diseases, of which diabetes is amongst them. Improving infectious disease prevention could reduce complications arising from the former diseases, consequences of decompensated diabetes condition (morbidity, incapacity, hospital admissions, healthcare costs, and mortality rates) and result in improved quality of life in patients with diabetes. The current review presents the treatment of infectious diseases in patients with diabetes and the dealing with immuno-preventable diseases with the currently advised vaccinations
Subject(s)
Humans , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Diabetes Complications/microbiology , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Mycoses/complications , Mycoses/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
The bidirectional relationship between infectious diseases and diabetes is well-known. On the one hand, diabetes patients are at a higher risk of presenting with infectious diseases, possibly with more severity, and on the other hand, infectious diseases impair metabolic control in patients with diabetes. Population ageing arises partly due to an increased survival rate in chronic diseases, of which diabetes is amongst them. Improving infectious disease prevention could reduce complications arising from the former diseases, consequences of decompensated diabetes condition (morbidity, incapacity, hospital admissions, healthcare costs, and mortality rates) and result in improved quality of life in patients with diabetes. The current review presents the treatment of infectious diseases in patients with diabetes and the dealing with immuno-preventable diseases with the currently advised vaccinations.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/therapy , Diabetes Complications/microbiology , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Mycoses/therapy , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Humans , Mycoses/complications , Mycoses/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Seasonal influenza epidemics are a major public health concern. They are caused by the influenza A and B viruses; although the A virus is more prominent, influenza B virus infection causes a disease with similar characteristics. There are two phylogenetically distinct influenza B lineages (B/Victoria and B/Yamagata), only one of which is present in the trivalent vaccine formulated each season. METHODS: Epidemiological data from the Spanish Influenza Surveillance System for 2007 to 2017 were reviewed to establish the relative proportion of each type of virus and the characterization of the B lineages in relation to the composition of the trivalent vaccine. RESULTS: The median proportion of B (2007-2017) was 27.2% (0.7%-74.8%) vs. 16.3% (0.4%-98.6%) for A-H3 and 44.2% (0.1%-98.0%) for pandemic A-H1N1 (20092017). The B lineages co-circulated in 8/10 seasons and there was mismatch with the B vaccine strain in 4/10 seasons. The B virus was dominant in 2007/08 and 2012/13 throughout Spain. There was a combination of dominance/codominance of influenza B and mismatch with the vaccine lineage in at least one third of epidemic seasons reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological information on influenza B has been less compiled in comparison with data on the A virus. Influenza virus type B is responsible for a significant number of cases in almost all seasons. The predominant B lineage in each season is unpredictable, affecting the protection conferred by the seasonal vaccine. Spanish epidemiological data support the rationale for a quadrivalent vaccine with both B virus lineages similarly to data from other settings.
Subject(s)
Epidemics , Influenza B virus , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Geography , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza A virus , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Seasons , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Vaccination/trends , Papilloma/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Warts/prevention & control , Community Health ServicesABSTRACT
El cáncer de mama es una enfermedad prevalente con implicaciones en todas las esferas de la vida de las pacientes, por lo que el médico de familia debe conocer en profundidad esta dolencia, para optimizar la atención con los mejores recursos disponibles. Los 5 artículos que se presentan ofrecen un resumen elaborado a partir de una revisión detallada de la literatura sobre el cáncer de mama publicada en los últimos 10 años. Este segundo artículo aborda el cribado poblacional y sus controversias, el cribado en las mujeres de mayor riesgo y las recomendaciones actuales. Esta revisión pretende ofrecer una visión global, actualizada y práctica sobre esta enfermedad que permita resolver los interrogantes que se presentan en la consulta de Atención Primaria, facilitar respuestas a las mujeres que lo soliciten y, en definitiva, permanecer al lado de las pacientes a lo largo de su enfermedad con la tranquilidad del conocimiento (AU)
Breast cancer is a prevalent disease affecting all areas of patients lives. Therefore, family doctors need to thoroughly understand this disease in order to optimize the health care services for these patients, making the best use of available resources. A series of 5 articles on breast cancer is presented below. It is based on a review of the scientific literature over the last 10 years. The second one deals with population screening and its controversies, screening in high-risk women, and the current recommendations. This summary report aims to provide a current and practical review about this problem, providing answers to family doctors, and helping them to be able to care for their patients for their benefit throughout their illness (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/trends , Primary Health Care , Family Practice/methods , Family Practice/organization & administration , Family Practice/standards , Education, Continuing/methods , Mammography/methods , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/standards , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Family Practice/trends , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/policiesABSTRACT
El cáncer de mama es una enfermedad prevalente con implicaciones en todas las esferas de la vida de las pacientes, por lo que el médico de familia debe conocer en profundidad esta dolencia, para optimizar la atención con los mejores recursos disponibles. Los 5 artículos que se presentan a continuación ofrecen un resumen elaborado a partir de una revisión detallada de la literatura sobre el cáncer de mama publicada en los últimos 10 años. El primero de ellos trata sobre la epidemiología, los factores de riesgo y los factores protectores de esta enfermedad. Esta revisión pretende ofrecer una visión global, actualizada y práctica sobre esta enfermedad que permita resolver los interrogantes que se presentan en la consulta de Atención Primaria, facilitar respuestas a las mujeres que lo soliciten y, en definitiva, permanecer al lado de las pacientes a lo largo de su enfermedad con la tranquilidad del conocimiento (AU)
Breast cancer is a prevalent disease affecting all areas of the patients lives. Therefore, family physicians should have a thorough knowledge of this disease in order to optimize the health care services for these patients, and making the best use of available resources. A series of 5 articles on breast cancer is presented below. It is based on a review of the scientific literature over the last 10 years. The first article reviews the epidemiology, risk factors, and protective factors in this disease This summary report aims to provide a current and practical review on breast cancer, providing answers to family doctors and helping them to support the patients for their benefit throughout their illness (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/trends , Risk Factors , Primary Health Care , Family Practice/organization & administration , Family Practice/standards , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/physiopathology , Anthropometry , Breast Neoplasms/geneticsABSTRACT
Breast cancer is a prevalent disease affecting all areas of the patients' lives. Therefore, family physicians should have a thorough knowledge of this disease in order to optimize the health care services for these patients, and making the best use of available resources. A series of 5 articles on breast cancer is presented below. It is based on a review of the scientific literature over the last 10 years. The first article reviews the epidemiology, risk factors, and protective factors in this disease This summary report aims to provide a current and practical review on breast cancer, providing answers to family doctors and helping them to support the patients for their benefit throughout their illness.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Humans , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Breast cancer is a prevalent disease affecting all areas of patients' lives. Therefore, family doctors need to thoroughly understand this disease in order to optimize the health care services for these patients, making the best use of available resources. A series of 5 articles on breast cancer is presented below. It is based on a review of the scientific literature over the last 10 years. The second one deals with population screening and its controversies, screening in high-risk women, and the current recommendations. This summary report aims to provide a current and practical review about this problem, providing answers to family doctors, and helping them to be able to care for their patients for their benefit throughout their illness.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Mass Screening/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Physicians, Family/organization & administrationABSTRACT
No disponible
