Carcinoma basocelular cutáneo: diagnóstico y tratamiento en atención especializada dermatológica. Guía de Práctica Clínica de la AEDV / Diagnosis and Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma in Specialized Dermatology Units: A Clinical Practice Guideline

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: El carcinoma basocelular supone el cáncer de piel más frecuente en la población. Hay una gran variabilidad en su manejo y las diferentes guías extranjeras que existen son difícilmente aplicables en nuestro medio. El objetivo de la presente guía es servir de referencia a los dermatólogos españoles para mejorar el manejo de este tumor basándose en la evidencia actual. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se escogió a miembros del Grupo Español de Dermato-Oncología y Cirugía (GEDOC) con experiencia en el tratamiento de estos tumores y con interés en participar en la elaboración de la guía. Se hizo una adaptación de las guías de práctica clínica existentes mediante el método ADAPTE, se resumió el proceso de atención, y se elaboraron las preguntas clínicas relevantes. Se seleccionaron las guías mejor puntuadas mediante el instrumento AGREE II, realizando la búsqueda de las respuestas en dichas guías y elaborando posteriormente las recomendaciones. Finalmente se sometió la guía a revisión externa. RESULTADOS: Las guías con mejor puntuación fueron las de la British Association of Dermatologits (BAD), del National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), del European Dermatology Forum (EDF) y de la European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). Se obtuvieron en total 11 preguntas clínicas, contestadas a partir de estas guías. CONCLUSIONES: Esta guía responde a preguntas habituales sobre el manejo del carcinoma basocelular en la práctica clínica diaria y sirve a los dermatólogos como referencia en la toma de decisiones, siempre teniendo en cuenta los recursos y las preferencias del paciente

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the general population. BCC is managed in a variety of ways, and available international guidelines are difficult to put into practice in Spain. This guideline aims to improve the management of BCC based on current evidence and provide a point of reference for Spanish dermatologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Members of the Spanish Oncologic Dermatology and Surgery Group (GEDOC) with experience treating BCC were invited to participate in drafting this guideline. The drafters used the ADAPTE collaboration process to develop the new guideline based on existing ones, first summarizing the care pathway and posing relevant clinical questions. They then searched for guidelines, assessed them with the AGREEII (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) tool, and searched the selected guidelines for answers to the clinical questions. Finally, the recommendations were drafted and submitted for external review. RESULTS: The highest-scoring guidelines were from the Association of Dermatologists, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the European Dermatology Forum, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. A total of 11 clinical questions were answered. CONCLUSIONS: This new guideline answers the working group's clinical questions about the routine management of BCC in Spain. It provides dermatologists with a tool they can use for decision-making while taking into consideration the resources available and patient preferences

Diagnosis and Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma in Specialized Dermatology Units: A Clinical Practice Guideline. / Carcinoma basocelular cutáneo: diagnóstico y tratamiento en atención especializada dermatológica. Guía de Práctica Clínica de la AEDV.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the general population. BCC is managed in a variety of ways, and available international guidelines are difficult to put into practice in Spain. This guideline aims to improve the management of BCC based on current evidence and provide a point of reference for Spanish dermatologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Members of the Spanish Oncologic Dermatology and Surgery Group (GEDOC) with experience treating BCC were invited to participate in drafting this guideline. The drafters used the ADAPTE collaboration process to develop the new guideline based on existing ones, first summarizing the care pathway and posing relevant clinical questions. They then searched for guidelines, assessed them with the AGREEII (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) tool, and searched the selected guidelines for answers to the clinical questions. Finally, the recommendations were drafted and submitted for external review. RESULTS: The highest-scoring guidelines were from the Association of Dermatologists, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the European Dermatology Forum, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. A total of 11 clinical questions were answered. CONCLUSIONS: This new guideline answers the working group's clinical questions about the routine management of BCC in Spain. It provides dermatologists with a tool they can use for decision-making while taking into consideration the resources available and patient preferences.

Descripción de pacientes no aptos para ser sometidos a cirugía de Mohs tras valoración prequirúrgica: datos del registro español Regesmohs / Description of patients excluded for Mohs surgery after pre-surgical evaluation: data from the Regesmohs Spanish registry

ANTECEDENTES: El registro Regesmohs es un registro de ámbito nacional, de pacientes evaluados y sometidos a una cirugía de Mohs, en 17 centros españoles, desde julio de 2013. Como la cirugía de Mohs es el tratamiento que mejores resultados da para el manejo del carcinoma de células basales (CCB) de alto riesgo y otros tumores de la piel, queríamos describir los motivos por los que algunos pacientes fueron considerados no aptos para ser sometidos a este tratamiento y qué tratamientos alternativos recibieron. Estos datos pueden ser útiles para evitar excluir a pacientes aptos para ser sometidos a una cirugía de Mohs, para calcular la demanda que estos pacientes generan a nivel sanitario, así como la demanda que hay de tratamientos de inhibidores de la vía de Hedgehog en dicho grupo de pacientes. OBJETIVO: Describir a aquellos pacientes que fueron considerados no aptos para ser sometidos a una cirugía de Mohs tras valoración prequirúrgica y los tratamientos que recibieron. MÉTODOS: Regesmohs incluye a todos los pacientes consecutivos para ser sometidos a una cirugía de Mohs en los centros participantes, recogiendo datos sobre las características de los pacientes, las intervenciones y los resultados a corto y largo plazo. Se hizo una descripción de los pacientes considerados no aptos para ser sometidos a una cirugía de Mohs tras valoración prequirúrgica. RESULTADOS: Tres mil once pacientes fueron incluidos en el registro Regesmohs entre julio de 2013 y octubre de 2016. En 85 pacientes no se realizó cirugía de Mohs porque se consideraron candidatos inadecuados. Sesenta y siete pacientes presentaban CCB. Las razones para ser considerado paciente no apto fueron: contraindicaciones médicas (27,1%, n = 23), tumores de bajo riesgo (18,8%, n = 16) y tumores gigantes e invasión ósea (15,3%, n = 13). Solo un paciente (1,2%) reveló compromiso de ganglios linfáticos y ningún paciente metástasis visceral. De los 85 pacientes considerados no aptos 29 (34,1%) fueron sometidos a cirugía convencional, 24 (28,3%) a radioterapia, 4 (4,7%) a inhibidores de la vía de Hedgehog (solo indicado para el CCB) y 2 (2,4%) a tratamiento paliativo. No hubo datos de seguimiento de 14 pacientes (16,5%). CONCLUSIÓN: Las comorbilidades médicas fueron la razón más habitual para retener la cirugía de Mohs. Retener un tratamiento en función de una propagación a lugares distantes no es algo habitual. La mayoría de los pacientes considerados no aptos recibieron tratamientos más sencillos: cirugía convencional o radioterapia, siendo los inhibidores de la vía de Hedgehog una opción novedosa

BACKGROUND: Regesmohs registry is a nationwide registry including patients evaluated for Mohs surgery in 17 Spanish centres since July 2013. Given that Mohs surgery is the therapy with best results for high risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and other skin tumours, we wanted to describe the reasons that lead to some patients being excluded from this therapy and the alternative treatments that they received. These data may be useful to avoid excluding patients for Mohs surgery use, to estimate the healthcare demand of these patients and the demand for Hedgehog inhibitors therapy in this group. OBJECTIVE: To describe patients excluded for Mohs surgery after pre-surgical assessment, and the treatments that they received. METHODS: Regesmohs includes all consecutive patients assessed for Mohs surgery in the participating centres, collecting data on patient characteristics, intervention, and short and long-term results. Patients excluded for Mohs surgery after pre-surgical evaluation were described. RESULTS: 3011 patients were included in Regesmohs from July 2013 to October 2016. In 85, Mohs surgery was not performed as they were considered inadequate candidates. 67 had BCC. Reasons for exclusion were: medical contraindication (27.1%, n = 23) low-risk tumour in (18.8%, n = 16) and giant tumour and bone invasion (15.3%, n = 13). Only 1 patient (1.2%) showed lymph node involvement and no patients had visceral metastases. Of the 85 excluded patients, 29 (34.1%) were treated with conventional surgery, 24 (28.3%) with radiotherapy, 4 (4.7%) with inhibitors of the Hedgehog pathway (only indicated for BCC), and 2 (2.4%) received palliative care. We had no follow-up data on 14 patients (16.5%). CONCLUSION: Medical comorbidities were the most common reason for withholding Mohs surgery. Withholding therapy on the basis of distant extension is uncommon. Most excluded patients received simpler therapies: conventional surgery or radiotherapy, with hedgehog inhibitors being a new option

Description of patients excluded for Mohs surgery after pre-surgical evaluation: data from the Regesmohs Spanish registry. / Descripción de pacientes no aptos para ser sometidos a cirugía de Mohs tras valoración prequirúrgica: datos del registro español Regesmohs.

BACKGROUND: Regesmohs registry is a nationwide registry including patients evaluated for Mohs surgery in 17 Spanish centres since July 2013. Given that Mohs surgery is the therapy with best results for high risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and other skin tumours, we wanted to describe the reasons that lead to some patients being excluded from this therapy and the alternative treatments that they received. These data may be useful to avoid excluding patients for Mohs surgery use, to estimate the healthcare demand of these patients and the demand for Hedgehog inhibitors therapy in this group. OBJECTIVE: To describe patients excluded for Mohs surgery after pre-surgical assessment, and the treatments that they received. METHODS: Regesmohs includes all consecutive patients assessed for Mohs surgery in the participating centres, collecting data on patient characteristics, intervention, and short and long-term results. Patients excluded for Mohs surgery after pre-surgical evaluation were described. RESULTS: 3011 patients were included in Regesmohs from July 2013 to October 2016. In 85, Mohs surgery was not performed as they were considered inadequate candidates. 67 had BCC. Reasons for exclusion were: medical contraindication (27.1%, n=23) low-risk tumour in (18.8%, n=16) and giant tumour and bone invasion (15.3%, n=13). Only 1 patient (1.2%) showed lymph node involvement and no patients had visceral metastases. Of the 85 excluded patients, 29 (34.1%) were treated with conventional surgery, 24 (28.3%) with radiotherapy, 4 (4.7%) with inhibitors of the Hedgehog pathway (only indicated for BCC), and 2 (2.4%) received palliative care. We had no follow-up data on 14 patients (16.5%). CONCLUSION: Medical comorbidities were the most common reason for withholding Mohs surgery. Withholding therapy on the basis of distant extension is uncommon. Most excluded patients received simpler therapies: conventional surgery or radiotherapy, with hedgehog inhibitors being a new option.

Descripción de las intervenciones quirúrgicas recogidas en el registro español de cirugía de Mohs (REGESMOHS) (2013-2015) / Characterization of Surgical Procedures in the Spanish Mohs Surgery Registry (REGESMOHS) for 2013-2015

Introducción: El Registro Español de Cirugía de Mohs recoge los datos de aplicación y resultados de esta técnica en España. Se describen los datos de las intervenciones realizadas desde el inicio del Registro en julio de 2013 a enero de 2016. Se analizan los datos de las cirugías tanto perioperatorios como intraoperatorios. Material y métodos: Estudio de cohortes prospectivo en el que participan 18 centros. Se recogen los datos de las intervenciones quirúrgicas como tipo de anestesia, técnica quirúrgica, ingreso hospitalario, número de estadios, manejo de factores de riesgo preoperatorios, tratamientos complementarios, tratamientos previos, tipo de tumor, tiempo empleado en la cirugía y complicaciones. Resultados: Se analizan 1.796 intervenciones quirúrgicas. El tumor intervenido con más frecuencia es el carcinoma basocelular (85,96%), seguido del carcinoma epidermoide (6,18%), lentigo maligno (2,81%) y dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (1,97%). El 66,9% de los tumores eran primarios, el 19,2% recurrentes y el 13,9% persistentes. El tratamiento previo más frecuente fue quirúrgico. La cirugía de Mohs se realizó con más frecuencia bajo anestesia local (86,7%) y de forma ambulatoria (71,8%). En el 89,5% de los casos se utilizó la técnica de Mohs en congelación. El número de etapas requerido para alcanzar márgenes libres de tumor fue una en 56,45% de los pacientes, 2 en 32,1%, 3 en 7,1%, 4 en 2,7% y 5 o más en 1,8%. El propio dermatólogo reconstruyó el defecto en el 98% de los pacientes y la técnica reconstructiva más utilizada fue el colgajo (47,2%). Solo el 1,62% de los pacientes presentó alguna complicación intraoperatoria y la mediana de la duración de la cirugía fue 75 (p25:60-p75:100). Conclusión: Las características de los pacientes y tumores tratados son similares a las descritas en estudios de las mismas características en otras áreas geográficas. Existe un porcentaje mayor de lentigo maligno y dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. La reconstrucción la realiza el dermatólogo con más frecuencia que en otras series. El tiempo de utilización de quirófano no es mucho mayor que para otras técnicas y la tasa de complicaciones intraoperatorias es muy reducida (AU)

Introduction: The Spanish Mohs Surgery Registry is used to collect data on the use and outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in Spain. The aim of this study was to describe perioperative and intraoperative data recorded for MMS procedures performed between July 2013 (when the registry started) and January 2016. Material and methods: Prospective cohort study of data from 18 hospitals. The data collected included type of anesthesia, surgical technique, hospital admission, number of Mohs stages, management of preoperative risk factors, additional treatments, previous treatments, type of tumor, operating time, and complications. Results: Data were available for 1796 operations. The most common tumor treated by MMS was basal cell carcinoma (85.96%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (6.18%), lentigo maligna (2.81%), and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (1.97%). Primary tumors accounted for 66.9% of all tumors operated on; 19.2% of tumors were recurrent and 13.9% were persistent. The most common previous treatment was surgical. MMS was mostly performed under local anesthesia (86.7% of cases) and as an outpatient procedure (71.8%). The frozen section technique was used in 89.5% of cases. One stage was needed to achieve tumor-free margins in 56.45% of patients; 2 stages were required in 32.1% of patients, 3 in 7.1%%, 4 in 2.7%, and 5 or more in 1.8%. The defect was reconstructed by the dermatologist in 98% of patients and the most common technique was flap closure (47.2%). Intraoperative complications were recorded for just 1.62% of patients and the median (interquartile range) duration of surgery was 75 (60-100) minutes. Conclusion: The characteristics of the patients and tumors treated by MMS are similar to those reported for similar studies in other geographic areas. Lentigo maligna and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans accounted for a higher proportion of cases in our series, and repair of the surgical defect by a dermatologist was also more common. Operating times in MMS are not much longer than those reported for other procedures and the rate of intraoperative complications is very low (AU)

Characterization of Surgical Procedures in the Spanish Mohs Surgery Registry (REGESMOHS) for 2013-2015. / Descripción de las intervenciones quirúrgicas recogidas en el registro español de cirugía de Mohs (REGESMOHS) (2013-2015).

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish Mohs Surgery Registry is used to collect data on the use and outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in Spain. The aim of this study was to describe perioperative and intraoperative data recorded for MMS procedures performed between July 2013 (when the registry started) and January 2016. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study of data from 18 hospitals. The data collected included type of anesthesia, surgical technique, hospital admission, number of Mohs stages, management of preoperative risk factors, additional treatments, previous treatments, type of tumor, operating time, and complications. RESULTS: Data were available for 1796 operations. The most common tumor treated by MMS was basal cell carcinoma (85.96%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (6.18%), lentigo maligna (2.81%), and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (1.97%). Primary tumors accounted for 66.9% of all tumors operated on; 19.2% of tumors were recurrent and 13.9% were persistent. The most common previous treatment was surgical. MMS was mostly performed under local anesthesia (86.7% of cases) and as an outpatient procedure (71.8%). The frozen section technique was used in 89.5% of cases. One stage was needed to achieve tumor-free margins in 56.45% of patients; 2 stages were required in 32.1% of patients, 3 in 7.1%%, 4 in 2.7%, and 5 or more in 1.8%. The defect was reconstructed by the dermatologist in 98% of patients and the most common technique was flap closure (47.2%). Intraoperative complications were recorded for just 1.62% of patients and the median (interquartile range) duration of surgery was 75 (60-100) minutes. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of the patients and tumors treated by MMS are similar to those reported for similar studies in other geographic areas. Lentigo maligna and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans accounted for a higher proportion of cases in our series, and repair of the surgical defect by a dermatologist was also more common. Operating times in MMS are not much longer than those reported for other procedures and the rate of intraoperative complications is very low.

Infantile hemangiomas with minimal or arrested growth associated with soft tissue hypertrophy: a case series of 10 patients.

BACKGROUND: Infantile hemangiomas with minimal or arrested growth (IH-MAGs) are characterized by a proliferative component of <25% of its surface area. The co-occurrence of IH-MAGs and soft tissue anomalies is rare, and case series of this association are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We present 10 cases of IH-MAGs associated with soft tissue hypertrophy and describe their clinical features. METHODS: We reviewed all infantile hemangiomas with minimal or arrested growth seen between 2009 and 2016 in the dermatology clinic department at Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona. To collect more patients, we also requested cases from the Hemangioma Investigator Group and members of the Spanish Society of Vascular Anomalies. RESULTS: Ten patients had IH-MAGs associated with soft tissue hypertrophy; seven involving the arm and three involving the leg. All displayed a segmental pattern, a doughy and puffy texture and prominent surface veins. No significant asymmetries in limbs and no other visceral anomalies were observed at follow-up (range 15 months to 7 years). One patient reported coldness in the limb with infantile hemangioma, but RMI-angiography did not disclose a vascular malformation underneath the lesion. Ulceration was observed in three patients. The proliferative component in all IH-MAGs had faded at 1-year follow-up, while soft tissue hypertrophy and prominent vessels remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In this first case series of IH-MAGS associated with soft tissue hypertrophy, soft tissue hypertrophy was not progressive and remained unchanged over time, unlike the proliferative component of classic infantile hemangioma. The origin of the prominent vessels and the higher ulceration risk are unknown; however, these findings are probably related to a minor disruption of local vessels not detected in imaging tests.

Censo de los centros que realizan cirugía de Mohs en España y descripción de su actividad: estudio de factibilidad para el registro de cirugía de Mohs de la FAEDV / Census of Centers That Perform Mohs’ Micrographic Surgery in Spain and Description of Their Activity: A Feasibility Study for the Mohs’ Micrographic Surgery Registry of the Foundation of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

No disponible

Descripción de los pacientes intervenidos mediante cirugía de Mohs en España. Datos basales del registro español de cirugía de Mohs (REGESMOHS) / Description of Patients Undergoing Mohs Surgery in Spain: Initial Report on Data From the Spanish Registry of Mohs Surgery (REGESMOHS)

INTRODUCCIÓN: En julio de 2013 se inició la recogida de datos del registro español de cirugía micrográfica de Mohs, que describe la aplicación y los resultados de esta técnica en España. En este artículo se describen las características del paciente y de los tumores tratados. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio de cohortes prospectivo en el que participan centros en los que se practica al menos una intervención semanal de cirugía micrográfica de Mohs. En cada centro se incluyen todos los pacientes que son valorados para realizar cirugía de Mohs, excepto los declarados judicialmente incapaces. En este artículo describimos las características de los pacientes y los tumores incluidos en la cohorte. RESULTADOS: El número de pacientes incluidos desde julio de 2013 hasta octubre de 2014 es de 655. La mayoría de los tumores cutáneos intervenidos correspondieron a carcinoma basocelular, siendo el infiltrante el subtipo histológico más frecuente. La mayoría de las cirugías se practicaron en tumores localizados en la cara y el cuero cabelludo, siendo la localización más frecuente la nariz. Casi el 40% de los tumores operados son recurrentes o persistentes, y el tamaño tumoral prequirúrgico es similar en nuestro medio al descrito en otros estudios australianos o europeos. Hasta el 45,5% de los pacientes había recibido algún tratamiento quirúrgico previo. CONCLUSIÓN: Los datos observados son similares a los de otras series publicadas, y son relevantes para poder valorar la aplicabilidad en nuestro contexto de estudios realizados en otros medios

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish registry of Mohs micrographic surgery started collecting data in July 2013. The aim of the registry is to report on the use of this technique in Spain and the outcomes achieved. In the present article, we describe the characteristics of patients and the tumors treated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. The participating centers are hospitals where at least one intervention of this type is performed each week. All patients considered for Mohs micrographic surgery in participating centers are included in the registry except those who have been declared legally incompetent. RESULTS: Between July 2013 and October 2014, data from 655 patients were included in the registry. The most common tumor involved was basal cell carcinoma, and the most common histological subtype was infiltrative basal cell carcinoma. Most of the tumors treated were located on the face or scalp, and the most common site was the nose. Almost 40% of the tumors treated were recurrent or persistent, and preoperative tumor size was similar to that reported in other European studies and in Australia. In total, 45.5% of patients had received previous surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings are similar to those reported in other studies, and the data collected are useful for assessing whether the results of studies carried out elsewhere are applicable in Spain

Description of Patients Undergoing Mohs Surgery in Spain: Initial Report on Data From the Spanish Registry of Mohs Surgery (REGESMOHS).

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish registry of Mohs micrographic surgery started collecting data in July 2013. The aim of the registry is to report on the use of this technique in Spain and the outcomes achieved. In the present article, we describe the characteristics of patients and the tumors treated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. The participating centers are hospitals where at least one intervention of this type is performed each week. All patients considered for Mohs micrographic surgery in participating centers are included in the registry except those who have been declared legally incompetent. RESULTS: Between July 2013 and October 2014, data from 655 patients were included in the registry. The most common tumor involved was basal cell carcinoma, and the most common histological subtype was infiltrative basal cell carcinoma. Most of the tumors treated were located on the face or scalp, and the most common site was the nose. Almost 40% of the tumors treated were recurrent or persistent, and preoperative tumor size was similar to that reported in other European studies and in Australia. In total, 45.5% of patients had received previous surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings are similar to those reported in other studies, and the data collected are useful for assessing whether the results of studies carried out elsewhere are applicable in Spain.

Adaptación española de la Guía europea para la evaluación y tratamiento de la queratosis actínica / Spanish Adaptation of the European Guidelines for the Evaluation and Treatment of Actinic Keratosis

Las características de nuestro entorno sugieren que enfermedades como la queratosis actínica (QA) aumentarán su prevalencia y, en consecuencia, la demanda asistencial en los próximos años. Deben tenerse en cuenta una extensa lista de características clínicas en el abordaje terapéutico de la QA, hasta hace poco compuesto únicamente por técnicas ablativas y exclusivamente dirigidas a las lesiones, sin considerar el campo de cancerización. El incremento del arsenal terapéutico de los últimos años hace necesaria la homogenización de criterios que faciliten la elección de la mejor opción para cada paciente. La formulación de recomendaciones de consenso entre expertos a partir de la revisión de las evidencias científicas en cuanto a diagnóstico y tratamiento disponibles, permite aportar conocimiento dirigido a la mayor calidad en la atención de los pacientes, facilita una mayor homogeneidad en la toma de decisiones y promueve la sensibilización necesaria de todos los agentes sanitarios involucrados

Current trends in our setting indicate that the prevalence of actinic keratosis and similar diseases will increase in coming years and impose a greater burden on health care resources. A long list of clinical features must be taken into account when approaching the treatment of actinic keratosis. Until recently, therapeutic approaches focused solely on ablative procedures and the treatment of individual lesions and did not take into account areas of field cancerization. Now that the therapeutic arsenal has grown, standardized criteria are needed to guide the optimal choice of treatment for each patient. The elaboration of evidence-based consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of actinic keratosis generates knowledge that will help clinicians to deliver the highest level of care possible, standardizing decision-making processes and enhancing awareness among all the health professionals involved in the care pathway

Spanish adaptation of the European guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of actinic keratosis.

Current trends in our setting indicate that the prevalence of actinic keratosis and similar diseases will increase in coming years and impose a greater burden on health care resources. A long list of clinical features must be taken into account when approaching the treatment of actinic keratosis. Until recently, therapeutic approaches focused solely on ablative procedures and the treatment of individual lesions and did not take into account areas of field cancerization. Now that the therapeutic arsenal has grown, standardized criteria are needed to guide the optimal choice of treatment for each patient. The elaboration of evidence-based consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of actinic keratosis generates knowledge that will help clinicians to deliver the highest level of care possible, standardizing decision-making processes and enhancing awareness among all the health professionals involved in the care pathway.

[Adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs in neurology]. / Reacciones cutáneas adversas a drogas en Neurología.

Skin drug reactions are cutaneous rashes caused by drugs, through different pathogenic mechanisms that can be classified into two groups: immunologically mediated and non-immunologically mediated. In the first part of this chapter we are going to study the cutaneous reactions to aromatic antiepileptic drugs, namely phenytoin, and focusing attention towards potentially life-threatening drug reactions of an immune cause such as toxic epidermal necrolysis and hypersensitivity syndrome. Secondly we are going briefly summarize skin reactions to drugs usually dealt with in neurological diseases, following a classification based on the morphological aspects of the lesions present in each reaction.

Syringomas localized to the penis (case report).

Syringomas localized in the genital areas are unusual. There are only three cases reported describing syringomas on the penis. Owing to this atypical localization it is necessary to consider a differential diagnosis involving other papular lesions more frequent found on the penile skin.