Resuscitative events in a level 4 NICU: Prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of compressive versus non-compressive events.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of neonates needing emergent resuscitation within the level 4 neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Clinical factors prior to and following resuscitation event or characteristics of those who require chest compressions versus those without compressions has not been previously delineated. The aim of this study is to describe characteristics and outcomes of neonates who have compressive vs. non-compressive resuscitative events. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of neonates with a resuscitative event in the Children's Mercy Hospital level 4 NICU between January 2012 and April 2017. Data were derived from the NICU Code Blue database and the electronic medical record. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULT: Of the 641 resuscitative events, most were in the non-compressive group (n = 481). Those requiring chest compressions longer than 1 minute had significantly different clinical characteristics and decreased survival. There was no difference between groups in gestational age or birth weight. CONCLUSION: Non-compressive events are more common in the NICU setting than are compressive events. Neonates requiring chest compressions longer than 1 minute are more likely to have a higher respiratory severity score, need for vasopressors, worse renal function post-event, and decreased survival to discharge.

Interdisciplinary onsite team-based simulation training in the neonatal intensive care unit: a pilot report.

OBJECTIVE: Simulation training improves individual clinician confidence, performance and self-efficacy in resuscitation and procedural training experiences. The reality of resuscitation experiences in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is that they are team-accomplished events. However, limited data exist on team-based simulation training (TBST) in the NICU. We report the experience of TBST over a 4-year period. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective report of 65 TBST events in a 71-bed Level IV NICU at a regional subspecialty children's hospital. Participants were more than 500 NICU staff, including neonatal/cardiac/surgical attendings, neonatal fellows, neonatal nurse practitioners, pediatric residents, registered nurses and respiratory therapists. Background work, common case scenarios, training objectives and learning opportunities were reported, along with discipline-specific, and team and system areas for improvement. Qualitative, subjective data were tracked and efforts at collecting quantitative, objective data are ongoing. RESULTS: Seventy-five TBST events were scheduled from November 2010 through December 2014; 10 of these were canceled. TBST events occurred both night (n=23) and day (n=42), and also on weekends (n=19), using high-fidelity (n=42) and low-fidelity (n=23) systems. Resuscitation team participants at each TBST were 12-30 providers and staff. The duration of each TBST event was 30-65 min including debriefing. Systems issues were identified and corrected, including problems activating the code pathway, issues using a pager activation system and confusion over resuscitation team roles and responsibilities. Educational needs were addressed, focused on topic areas that included arrhythmias and use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSION: With appropriate planning and implementation, TBST is feasible and realistic in a busy NICU.