Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Spine J ; 21(6): 1106-10, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22310885

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The indications for magnetic resonance imaging in presumed adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have not been established, with some studies suggesting that rates of spinal cord abnormalities are low and question the use of the routine MRI in AIS. OBJECTIVE: Given the restraints on MRI resources the authors performed a retrospective audit to see if the presence of coronal or sagittal misbalance-balance could be used as a surrogate marker for the presence of spinal cord abnormalities in this patient group and hence reduce the need for unnecessary MRI scans. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of imaging of patients with AIS at our centre over a 2-year-period. All MRI scans were reported by the senior author and the presence of spinal cord abnormalities noted. All plain films were assessed by a senior SpR and ST2 orthopaedic surgeons for Cobb angle, coronal balance, sagittal balance and Lenke classification. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were identified with AIS. Of these, a total of 15 patients (9%) were found to have neural axis anomalies on MRI including syringomyelia, Chiari malformations and dural ectasia. The average Cobb angle was 44.9° with coronal balance varying from 67.2 mm left to 40.2 mm right. Sagittal balance varied from 125 mm negative to 83 mm positive. No correlation was found between coronal/sagittal misbalance and the presence of neural axis anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Our audit demonstrates that neither coronal nor sagittal misbalance should be used as an indicator of neural axis abnormalities.


Subject(s)
Postural Balance , Scoliosis/complications , Spinal Cord/abnormalities , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Postural Balance/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/pathology , Spinal Cord Diseases/complications , Spinal Cord Diseases/epidemiology , Spinal Cord Diseases/pathology , Young Adult
2.
Neurosci Lett ; 338(3): 209-12, 2003 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12581833

ABSTRACT

Visual feedback control of tracking movements is dependent upon a visual comparison of the guiding target and moving limb positions but the human fovea greatly restricts the area of high acuity vision. The effect of vertically separating the target and movement cues in a slow movement task is investigated. Subjects track a slow constant velocity target in the horizontal plane with wrist flexion controlled cursor movements. The effects of changes in the vertical distance between the two cues upon tracking performance were observed. When both cursors were at the same level, tracking was most accurate but showed significant intermittency around 2 Hz in frequency. Increased separation of cues reduced significantly both accuracy and intermittency; tracking was smoother but less accurate. Thus, feedback control is dependent upon the efficiency of positional comparison and hence becomes less effective as the cue separation increases. These results also support previous studies suggesting each cue makes an equal contribution to visuomotor feedback control, each acting as a reference to the other.


Subject(s)
Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Adult , Cues , Feedback/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation , Visual Perception/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...