Impact of Faculty Training in Health Systems Science on Scholarly Presentation of Resident Physician and Fellow Quality Improvement Projects.

The objective was to evaluate whether faculty participation in a Health Systems Science training program was associated with increased presentation and publication of quality improvement (QI) projects involving resident physicians and fellows at 1 institution. The authors evaluated annual, department-level counts of QI projects with resident physician or fellow involvement, presented locally or published, according to residency or fellowship program director and faculty participation in Teachers of Quality Academy. Ten clinical departments had 82 presentations and 2 publications. Each additional faculty member's participation in Teachers of Quality Academy increased the annual count of published or presented QI projects by 9% (P < 0.001). At this institution, participation in a Health Systems Science training program among clinical faculty improved engagement of resident physicians and fellows in local presentation of QI projects.

Dissemination of Quality Improvement Project Results After Local Presentation.

Among quality improvement (QI) projects submitted for local presentation, the authors sought to understand how often project results were eventually disseminated through national/international presentation or peer-reviewed journal publication. Projects submitted for local presentation from 2016 to 2019 were linked to resulting publications or national/international conference presentations. Submitting authors were surveyed about their intentions, experience, and satisfaction with the process of disseminating their project results. Of 83 projects, 5 were published and another 10 were presented nationally/internationally. External dissemination was more likely with fewer project cycles and cost-focused outcomes. Survey responses indicated that most project leaders wanted to see their results published but held mixed opinions about resources and encouragement available to reach this goal. Few QI projects submitted for local presentation resulted in wider dissemination of project results. Sharing results and lessons learned beyond the local institution requires long-term planning, education, and support beginning early in the QI process.

Sustained oxygenation without ventilation in paralyzed pigs with high-flow tracheal oxygen.

OBJECTIVES: It is generally assumed that ventilation is necessary for oxygenation. This study tested if paralyzed animals without respirations can maintain arterial oxygenation when administered high-flow oxygen delivered by a catheter in the trachea. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 3 anesthetized/paralyzed swine weighing 29.5 +/- 4.2 kg. INTERVENTIONS/OBSERVATIONS: Pigs were intubated, anesthetized with intravenous tiletamine and a pentobarbital drip. A femoral arterial line was placed to record arterial blood gases and vital signs every 5 minutes. Respiratory paralysis was obtained with vecuronium 150 microg/kg and repeated at any sign of movement. A catheter was placed in the trachea to deliver oxygen at 15 L/min. Outflow gas from the endotracheal tube was analyzed for O2 and CO2. O2 was discontinued at 75 minutes. The institutional animal care and use committee approved the protocol. RESULTS: All pigs survived to 75 minutes. PaO2 was more than 100 mm Hg throughout the study period. Mean PaCO2 was 37.4 +/- 2.8 mm Hg at baseline, 146 +/- 59 at 30 minutes, then rose above 200 mm Hg in all pigs by 45 minutes. Mean arterial pH fell from 7.47 +/- 0.04 at onset to 6.75 +/- 0.06 at 75 minutes. When oxygen was terminated at 75 minutes, PaO2 fell to 16.5 +/- 7.6 mm Hg within 5 minutes, and all pigs were sacrificed within 10 minutes. For outflow gas, O2 was more than 98% and expired CO2 less than 1% throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Paralyzed, unventilated pigs receiving high-flow oxygen via a tracheal catheter remained alive after 75 minutes, although a profound respiratory acidosis developed.

Managing the difficult airway: a survey of residency directors and a call for change.

This study examines airway management issues in Emergency Medicine residency programs (EMRP) including; airway adjunct availability and frequency of use, number of pediatric intubations, approach to trauma airways, and teaching methods. Surveys were distributed to all accredited EM program directors, who were asked about these issues. Availability of airway adjuncts among respondents included: cricothyrotomy kits (94.9%), fiberoptic scopes (76.3%), Bougies (69.5%), LMAs (66.1%), intubating LMAs (61.0%), lighted stylets (54.2%), retrograde intubation kits (49.2%), Combitube (45.8%), and esophageal obturator airways (15.3%). Responses indicated that 93.6% of airways were orotracheal intubations. A small percentage of intubations used airway adjuncts. Programs use didactics, mannequins, cadavers, direct care and operating rooms for airway training. Emergency Physicians (EPs) are responsible for trauma airways in 89.9% of programs. Most programs have multiple airway adjuncts available, but they are rarely utilized. EPs must become proficient with airway adjuncts. EMRPs must increase resident exposure by using airway adjuncts during routine intubations.

The overcrowded emergency department: a comparison of staff perceptions.

OBJECTIVES: To study perceptions of physicians and nursing staff about real-time demands and capacity of an emergency department (ED). To use ED data to calculate proposed demand ratios called Real-time Emergency Analysis of Demand Indicators (READI) scores. To compare the READI scores with ED staff perceptions of demand and capacity. METHODS: This prospective study used a computerized clinical management system to provide data about ED demand and capacity. Physicians and staff charge nurses were surveyed about perceptions of ED demand and capacity. Results were compared with mathematical READI scores, which are proposed to objectively assess ED demand. Kappa scores were used to measure intrarater reliability between the physicians' and charge nurses' assessment of demand and between the staff assessments and the READI scores. RESULTS: Kappa scores of the perception of excess demand were as follows: between two physician groups, kappa = 0.392; between one physician group and charge nurses, kappa = 0.453; and between a second physician group and charge nurses, kappa = 0.243. Comparing respondents who indicated that demand had or had not exceeded capacity, one of the READI ratios, the Bed Ratio, showed a significant difference in mean, 0.245 (95% confidence interval = 0.153 to 0.336), between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time data may be used to predict ED demand and resource needs. Subjective assessment of excess ED demand did not correlate between physician groups or between physicians and charge nurses. Although there was a trend toward predicting excess demand with one of the READI scores, these scores did not correlate to staff perceptions.