Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Am Fam Physician ; 108(1): 40-50, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37440736

ABSTRACT

Approximately 7% of children in the United States younger than 18 years have a diagnosed eye disorder, and 1 in 4 children between two and 17 years of age wears glasses. Routine eye examinations during childhood can identify abnormalities necessitating referral to ophthalmology, which optimizes children's vision through the early diagnosis and treatment of abnormalities. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends vision screening at least once in children three to five years of age to detect amblyopia or its risk factors to improve visual acuity. The American Academy of Family Physicians supports this recommendation. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening starting at three years of age and at regular intervals in childhood, and that instrument-based screening (e.g., photoscreening, autorefraction) is an alternative to vision charts for testing visual acuity in patients three to five years of age. Eye examinations include visual acuity testing, external examinations, assessing ocular alignment and pupillary response, and assessing for opacities with the red reflex examination. Common abnormalities include refractive errors, amblyopia (reduction in visual acuity in one eye not attributable to structural abnormality), and strabismus (misalignment of the eye). Rare diagnoses include retinoblastoma (often detectable through loss of red reflex), cataracts (detectable by an abnormal red reflex), and glaucoma (often manifests as light sensitivity with corneal cloudiness and enlargement).


Subject(s)
Amblyopia , Refractive Errors , Strabismus , Vision Screening , Child , Humans , Amblyopia/etiology , Vision Screening/adverse effects , Strabismus/diagnosis , Strabismus/complications , Strabismus/therapy , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Refractive Errors/complications , Refractive Errors/therapy , Primary Health Care
2.
PRiMER ; 7: 10, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37089440

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, interviews during the 2021 US residency match were conducted virtually, a practice again recommended and repeated by many programs in 2022. The impact of virtual interviews on recruitment and match outcomes has recently been of interest, with results showing the virtual format to be mostly well received by applicants due to cost, travel, and scheduling benefits. Few studies have looked at pre/posttransition comparisons of applicant geographic and demographic data. We compared objective match outcomes between in-person and virtual interviews across three residency programs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of National Residency Matching Program data between 2015-2022 across three family medicine residency programs. Primary outcomes were fill rate, average rank position, distance from program, and percentage of underrepresented in medicine demographic status for matched applicants. We compared aggregate in-person data (2015-2019) to aggregate virtual data (2020-2022) for each program using χ2, Fisher Exact test, or 2-tailed t tests to 95% confidence. Results: Saint Joseph Hospital in Reading, Pennsylvania, a 3-year community-based university affiliated program, had significantly more unfilled positions during virtual recruitment (P=.0058). Mount Nittany Medical Center in State College, Pennsylvania, a 3-year community based university-affiliated program, had a significant difference in distance of matched residents' current address (P=.048). Virtual interviews were not associated with significant differences in average position on rank list, average distance from permanent address zip code, or percentage of underrepresented in medicine (URiM) demographic status for matched applicants. Conclusions: The impact of virtual interviewing on unfilled positions and geographic data is likely site specific and generally small, as some programs had significant structural changes. Further research is needed to confirm the generalizability of these results and explore future comparisons of demographic and geographic characteristics of matched applicants pre/posttransition to the virtual format.

4.
Clin Med Res ; 21(4): 226-229, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296639

ABSTRACT

While the cause of altered mentation in the elderly may be multifactorial, infectious etiologies may be missed. This case report aims to detail an account of a patient with dementia, found to have Lyme meningitis in the setting of a normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). The patient smelled of urine and presented with ambulatory dysfunction, fitting the "wet, wacky, and wobbly" triad of NPH while also having subjective chills and leukocytosis. Non-contrast brain CT scan showed dilated ventricles. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies suggested aseptic meningitis. Serum studies using a modified two-tiered algorithm confirmed the diagnosis of Lyme disease. Treatment of the underlying condition with a prolonged course of doxycycline improved symptoms and clinical course. Review of the literature on the association between Lyme meningitis and NPH reveals that few cases of Lyme-related NPH have been reported worldwide and further research into the pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, treatment modalities, and management of NPH secondary to Lyme meningitis may be warranted.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure , Lyme Disease , Meningitis , Humans , Aged , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/diagnosis , Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure/diagnostic imaging , Brain , Lyme Disease/complications , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Meningitis/complications , Meningitis/diagnosis , Dementia/complications , Dementia/diagnosis
8.
Subst Abus ; 43(1): 884-891, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179457

ABSTRACT

Background: Substance use accounts for more than 400,000 deaths annually in the United States and overdose rates surged during the COVID pandemic. While the pandemic created increased pressure for better prepared providers, it simultaneously placed restrictions on medical training programs. The purpose of this educational case series is to assess the feasibility of a virtual addiction medicine training program and conduct a qualitative evaluation of medical student attitudes toward caring for people with substance use disorders, both before and after their addiction medicine training experience. Methods: We conducted a qualitative analysis related to course content focused on strengths and limitations of in-person and virtual training modalities. Individual quotes were evaluated and content themes were developed after a thorough review of all codes and detailed examination of interviewee quotes. Results: The primary themes that emerged were (1) Addiction medicine content is important to improve care of patients with substance disorders and is not fully addressed in undergraduate medical education (2) In-person and virtual training contain unique strengths and weaknesses and (3) Students perceived that both experiences provided positive and needed training in addiction medicine that shifted perspective and enhanced confidence to practice. Conclusions: Remote training via virtual lectures and patient visits may enhance training opportunities for students with limited exposure to addiction medicine patients and faculty with addiction medicine expertise. There is a need to further refine virtual care for patients with SUDs and virtual training to meet the needs of patients and learners across the country.


Subject(s)
Addiction Medicine , COVID-19 , Education, Medical , Students, Medical , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
9.
J Community Health ; 47(1): 168-178, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34550504

ABSTRACT

Mortality from cervical and colorectal cancers can be reduced through routine screening, which can often be accessed through primary care. However, uptake of screening in the US remains suboptimal, with disparities observed across geographic characteristics, such as metropolitan status or level of racial residential segregation. Little is known about the interaction of metropolitan status and segregation in their relationship with cancer screening. We conducted a quantitative survey of 474 women aged 45-65 in central Pennsylvania. The survey collected county-level characteristics and participant-level demographics, beliefs, cancer screening barriers, and cervical and colorectal cancer screening. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression to analyze relationships between metropolitan status and segregation with screening. For cervical cancer screening, 82.8% of participants were up-to-date, which did not differ by county type in the final analysis. Higher healthcare trust, higher cancer fatalism, and reporting cost as a barrier were associated with cervical cancer screening. For colorectal cancer screening, 55.4% of participants were up-to-date, which differed by county type. In metropolitan counties, segregation was not associated with colorectal cancer screening, but in non-metropolitan counties, segregation was associated with greater colorectal cancer screening. The relationship between metropolitan status and being up-to-date with colorectal, but not cervical, cancer screening varied by segregation. Other important beliefs and barriers to screening varied by county type. This research can guide future cancer screening interventions in primary care settings in underserved communities.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Residence Characteristics , United States , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
10.
J Patient Exp ; 8: 23743735211063122, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34869851

ABSTRACT

Group medical visits (GMVs) for patients with chronic pain are becoming more accessible and have been shown to be successful in furthering patient education on multidisciplinary, nonopioid interventions. Unfortunately, evidence suggests that many group visit models lack sustainability due to recruitment issues and retention rates. Additionally, most of the studies surrounding GMVs are located in primarily urban health centers, potentially limiting their generalizability. This study aims to identify patient interest in and barriers to GMVs for chronic pain and to explore how chronic pain impacts daily lives for GMV content optimization in a nonurban population. Nineteen participants age 18 to 65 years participated in semistructured phone interviews to generate a thematic analysis. Participants received their care from family practitioners at a suburban multiclinic academic medical group and were being prescribed at least 50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at the time of recruitment. Analysis generated two themes: (1) Participants expressed specific interest in GMVs with few barriers identified, and (2) Pain has a negative impact on mental health and most aspects daily life, creating a foundation for discussion in GMVs. Findings support significant patient interest in group medical visits for chronic pain, but careful planning is necessary to address patient needs, expectations, and barriers in order to ensure GMV sustainability.

12.
J Patient Cent Res Rev ; 8(3): 239-247, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34322576

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Rates of loneliness and obesity have increased in recent decades. Loneliness and obesity independently have been found to be risk factors for negative physical and mental health outcomes. This study examined the rates and interrelationships of loneliness, body mass index (BMI), and health care utilization in a primary care setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of adult patients presenting for outpatient care at 7 family medicine clinical practices in Pennsylvania was conducted. Survey questions included self-reported measures of loneliness, height/weight, number of health care visits, and potential confounders (eg, sociodemographic variables, health status). Bivariate and multivariable linear regression models were used to analyze associations among loneliness, BMI, and health care utilization. RESULTS: In all, 464 eligible patients returned surveys for an overall response rate of 26%. Mean (standard deviation) loneliness score was 4.2 (1.7), mean BMI was 30.4 (7.6), and mean number of visits in year prior was 2.7 (3.6). On bivariate analysis, BMI was positively associated with loneliness (effect estimate: 0.50; P=0.03). On multivariable analysis, BMI was negatively associated with attending religious services and self-reported physical health and positively associated with self-reported mental health (P<0.05 for all), but not associated with loneliness. While not associated with loneliness, health care utilization was negatively associated with Hispanic ethnicity, marital status, and self-reported physical health (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Given the detrimental effects loneliness and obesity have on health outcomes, it might be prudent for health care providers to prioritize health concerns for their patients by assessing loneliness and counseling regarding associated risks, particularly in patients with obesity.

13.
Popul Health Manag ; 23(1): 47-52, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107173

ABSTRACT

Patients who are admitted to the hospital frequently (>3 admissions in a 6-month period) are a large driver of health care costs. Recently, research has focused on these groups of super-utilizing patients to try to find ways to meet their care needs in the outpatient setting. However, most research so far has focused on the urban underserved population who do not have a usual source of care. The goal of this study is to identify a group of patients from a suburban academic family medicine practice who have been admitted to the hospital frequently over a 6-month period and interview them to identify patient-perceived barriers to care in the outpatient setting. Nine of the 176 patients identified as frequently hospitalized were interviewed. Interpretive phenomenology analysis was used to identify perceived barriers and facilitators to care. Although some identified barriers were similar to those noted in groups of the urban underserved, including chronic disease and polypharmacy, other barriers were uniquely identified in the nonurban population, including transportation and support at home. Transportation issues, lack of support at home, and poor interdisciplinary communication were found to increase risk for readmission. Conversely, good interdisciplinary communication and ample support from family, including support services at home, were viewed as facilitators to outpatient care.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility , Hospitalization , Medical Overuse , Primary Health Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease/therapy , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polypharmacy , Population Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...