Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 36(7): 652-6, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20537840

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the late nineties of the former century, surgery for pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer in the southern part of The Netherlands was performed mainly in low-volume hospitals (<5 resections/year). Results reported by the Comprehensive Cancer Center South (CCCS) in 2005 revealed the clearly disappointing results of this practice. The former stimulated the regionalisation of pancreatic surgery by 3 collaborating surgical units into one non-academic teaching hospital in the eastern part of the CCCS-region starting from July 2005. METHODS: All of the 76 patients in this regional cohort group in whom a resection of a (peri-)pancreatic tumour was performed with curative intent have been followed up prospectively. The results of surgical morbidity and in-hospital mortality were compared with the results of the CCCS cohort group which were reported previously. RESULTS: Ever since the regionalisation the annual number of patients undergoing resection of a pancreatic tumour increased from 10 to 33, resulting in a total number of 76 patients. Post-operative complications, reoperation rate and in-hospital mortality decreased significantly to 34.2%, 18.4% and 2.6% respectively, as compared to 71.9%, 37.8 and 24.4% in the time period before regionalisation (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These unique comparative prospective data derived from daily practice in a collaborative surgical region in The Netherlands (CCCS) support the need for centralisation of pancreatic surgery in order to improve standard of care in pancreatic surgery. This can be achieved by collaboration in a large regional hospital.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, District/statistics & numerical data , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
2.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 125(3): 197-200, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15723191

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Case report about a minimally invasive technique for removal of a femoral antegrade nail (FAN). Femoral nails are introduced by minimally invasive techniques, but are often removed with more invasive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four cases of young patients are described in whom the femoral nail was removed after consolidation by a minimally invasive extraction technique at the trochanteric site. By using a threaded wire for locating the proximal entrance of the femoral nail followed by reaming over the wire, the entrance of the nail in the trochanteric region is freed. Then the extraction bolt can be placed over the wire and the nail can be extracted through the same incision as it was inserted in, without enlarging the incision. DISCUSSION: This case report discusses a technique for minimally invasive femoral nail extraction, not the necessity of removing nails. Leaving out the endcap at the initial operation is the only preoperative condition, since the endcap blocks the entrance of the nail. This operation is done with fluoroscopic guidance. The difficult part is the reaming. The reamer must not be damaged when approaching the nail entrance. This minimally invasive femoral nail extraction technique is applicable for various types of femoral nails. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive extraction of femoral nails is possible and needs more attention. The level of evidence is a level IV case series.


Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Device Removal/methods , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...