Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Public Health Nutr ; 27(1): e88, 2024 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465376

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Different forms of public and private regulation have been used to improve the healthiness of food retail environments. The aim of this scoping review was to systematically examine the types of private regulatory measures used to create healthy food retail environments, the reporting of the processes of implementation, monitoring, review and enforcement and the barriers to and enablers of these. DESIGN: Scoping review using the Johanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Business Source Complete and Scopus databases were searched in October 2020 and again in September 2023 using terms for 'food retail', 'regulation' and 'nutrition'. Regulatory measure type was described by domain and mechanism. Deductive thematic analysis was used to identify reported barriers and enablers to effective regulatory governance processes using a public health law framework. SETTING: Food retail. PARTICIPANTS: Food retail settings using private regulatory measures to create healthier food retail environments. RESULTS: In total, 17 694 articles were screened and thirty-five included for review from six countries, with all articles published since 2011. Articles reporting on twenty-six unique private regulatory measures cited a mix of voluntary (n 16), mandatory (n 6) measures, both (n 2) or did not disclose (n 2). Articles frequently reported on implementation (34/35), with less reporting on the other regulatory governance processes of monitoring (15/35), review (6/35) and enforcement (2/35). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend more attention be paid to reporting on the monitoring, review and enforcement processes used in private regulation to promote further progress in improving the healthiness of food retail environments.


Subject(s)
Food , Marketing , Humans , Environment , Food Preferences , Commerce
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373299

ABSTRACT

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Climate change is a defining public health issue of the 21st century. Food systems are drivers of diet-related disease burden, and account for 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Local governments play a crucial role in improving both the healthiness and environmental sustainability of food systems, but the potential for their actions to simultaneously address these two issues is unclear. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of Australian local government stakeholders regarding policy actions simultaneously addressing healthy eating and climate change, and the influences on policy adoption. METHODS: We conducted 11 in-depth semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from four local governments in Victoria, Australia. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. We applied Multiple Streams Theory (MST) 'problem', 'politics and 'policy' domains to explain policy adoption influences at the local government level. RESULTS: Key influences on local government action aligned with MST elements of 'problem' (e.g., local government's existing risk reports as drivers for climate change action), 'policy' (e.g., budgetary constraints) and 'politics' (e.g., local government executive agenda). We found limited evidence of coherent policy action in the areas of community gardens, food procurement and urban land use. CONCLUSION: Barriers to further action, such as resource constraints and competing priorities, could be overcome by better tailoring policy action areas to community needs, with the help of external partnerships and local government executive support. SO WHAT?: This study demonstrates that Victorian local stakeholders believe they are well-positioned to implement feasible and coherent interventions that address both healthy eating and climate.

3.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 36(6): 2336-2350, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37335560

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Civil society organisations (CSOs) are increasingly participating in food system governance in ways that challenge the dominant industrialised profit-driven system. METHODS: An online survey of Australian CSOs that self-identified as being involved in food system governance was conducted to identify their objectives and activities and the enablers of, and barriers to, their participation in food system governance. Respondents were nongovernment organisations/registered charities, social enterprises, businesses and collaborative research initiatives involved in food system governance in Australia (n = 43). RESULTS: Organisations undertook activities across all dimensions of the food system (food growing/production, distribution, sale, marketing, access and consumption) and had diverse goals related to health, sustainability and social and economic development. They engaged in food system governance via activities such as advocacy and lobbying for policy and legislative change and guiding policy development. Key enablers of this engagement included funding, internal capacity, external supports and collaborations, and inclusive consultation processes and, when not present, were considered barriers. CONCLUSIONS: CSOs play an important role in food system governance in Australia, including by influencing policy outcomes, contributing to more inclusive and democratic forms of governance and leading community-based food system policies. For CSOs to play a more central role, provision of longer-term funding; creation of dedicated food and nutrition policies at local, state and federal government levels; and governance processes that are inclusive, accessible and minimise power differentials are required. This study's findings can be used to identify many opportunities for dietitians to engage with CSOs in education, research and advocacy roles for food system transformation.


Subject(s)
Dietetics , Nutritionists , Humans , Australia , Nutrition Policy
4.
Public Health Nutr ; 26(1): 262-272, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32515719

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Online food delivery (OFD) platforms offer consumers a convenient and fast delivery service of foods and drinks sourced from foodservice partners (e.g. restaurants, quick service restaurants). There is a need to assess the impact of this emergent segment of the foodservice sector on diet and diet-related health. The aim of this narrative review was to describe the OFD sector in Australia, its use and identify potential ways to include OFD platforms in existing public health nutrition policy. DESIGN: A search was conducted in peer-reviewed and grey literature. Sources were analysed and synthesised to report the characteristics of OFD platforms, delivery process, users and potential drivers of usage. The aim and scope of public health nutrition policies were analysed to identify ways of including OFD platforms. SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: General population. RESULTS: There are three main operators with 9000-16 000 foodservice partners based predominantly in the main cities of Australia. OFD revenue has grown by 72 % in the last 5 years and is predicted to increase driven by usage by working adults with high disposable income who demand convenience. Current policies and initiatives aimed at manufacturers, retailers and foodservice outlets do not specifically regulate OFD platforms, although there is scope for these to be extended to such platforms. CONCLUSIONS: OFD platforms are disruptors of the foodservice sector. Innovative and consistent health policy options that target the unique challenges and opportunities posed by OFD platforms are required to limit the potentially negative impact of OFD platforms on diet and diet-related health.


Subject(s)
Food , Public Health , Adult , Humans , Nutritional Status , Restaurants , Nutrition Policy
5.
Health Promot J Austr ; 34(2): 488-499, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35718947

ABSTRACT

ISSUES ADDRESSED: Urgent action is required by all levels of government to create a food system capable of nourishing a rapidly growing population while remaining within planetary boundaries. This study investigated policies and programs implemented by Australian local governments (LGs) that aim to contribute to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system. METHODS: An online survey was completed by LGs (n = 64) in New South Wales and Victoria, Australia. Questions focused on LGs' food system-related policies and programs, barriers to and enablers of engaging in food system work and organisational responsibilities for food system work. RESULTS: Preventing food waste, organising food-related social/cultural events and providing potable water were the most commonly reported activities. Few LGs reported policies/activities on market gardening or sustainable agricultural practices, or strengthening food system resilience. LGs implemented a wide range of initiatives, such as hosting food forums, using research to identify and address food access issues and providing healthy food and drink options within LG-owned/managed facilities. Enablers of food system work included internal LG support, human resources, external funding and partnerships. Barriers included lack of community interest, short-term and/or project-based funding, internal governance issues and restrictive state government planning frameworks. CONCLUSION: Australian LGs undertake a wide range of actions addressing diverse food system issues; however, internal and external barriers constrain their involvement in creating a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system. SO WHAT?: Legislative reform, combined with increased financial and human resource capacity, would support LGs to expand, strengthen and sustain their food system work.


Subject(s)
Local Government , Humans , Food , Nutrition Policy , Policy Making , Refuse Disposal , Victoria , Australia , New South Wales
6.
Global Health ; 18(1): 72, 2022 07 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35870937

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Introducing legislation that restricts companies from exposing children to marketing of unhealthy food and beverage products is both politically and technically difficult. To advance the literature on the technical design of food marketing legislation, and to support governments around the world with legislative development, we aimed to describe the legislative approach from three governments. METHODS: A multiple case study methodology was adopted to describe how three governments approached designing comprehensive food marketing legislation (Chile, Canada and the United Kingdom). A conceptual framework outlining best practice design principles guided our methodological approach to examine how each country designed the technical aspects of their regulatory response, including the regulatory form adopted, the substantive content of the laws, and the implementation and governance mechanisms used. Data from documentary evidence and 15 semi-structured key informant interviews were collected and synthesised using a directed content analysis. RESULTS: All three countries varied in their legislative design and were therefore considered of variable strength regarding the legislative elements used to protect children from unhealthy food marketing. When compared against the conceptual framework, some elements of best practice design were present, particularly relating to the governance of legislative design and implementation, but the scope of each law (or proposed laws) had limitations. These included: the exclusion of brand marketing; not protecting children up to age 18; focusing solely on child-directed marketing instead of all marketing that children are likely to be exposed to; and not allocating sufficient resources to effectively monitor and enforce the laws. The United Kingdom's approach to legislation is the most comprehensive and more likely to meet its regulatory objectives. CONCLUSIONS: Our synthesis and analysis of the technical elements of food marketing laws can support governments around the world as they develop their own food marketing restrictions. An analysis of the three approaches illustrates an evolution in the design of food marketing laws over time, as well as the design strengths offered by a legislative approach. Opportunities remain for strengthening legislative responses to protect children from unhealthy food marketing practices.


Subject(s)
Food , Marketing , Adolescent , Beverages , Canada , Chile , Food Industry , Humans , Marketing/methods
7.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 46(3): 332-339, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35436000

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyse local government (LG) policies concerned with creating a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system. METHODS: All relevant policies on LG websites were identified and analysed against a framework of 34 recommendations for LG action on food system issues. RESULTS: A total of 13 of 207 (New South Wales 128, Victoria 79) LGs had dedicated food system policies. Most actions on food system issues were in general (non-food specific) policies. Most LGs acted on food safety, sustainable local food production, food waste, drinking water access and food system-related education. Few used economic measures to support the consumption of healthier foods, restricted unhealthy food advertising, developed and implemented dietary guidelines in LG-managed settings or influenced the opening of unhealthy/healthy retail food outlets. CONCLUSIONS: LGs undertook a range of actions relevant to creating a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system. Strategic opportunities for LGs include regulating the sale and marketing of unhealthy food and ensuring policy coherence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: LGs can be supported to act further on food system issues, including through 'joined-up' state and federal policies. Further research should address how relevant LG policies can be developed, implemented and monitored effectively to address the complex challenges created by contemporary food systems.


Subject(s)
Local Government , Refuse Disposal , Australia , Food , Humans , New South Wales , Nutrition Policy
8.
Curr Nutr Rep ; 11(1): 82-93, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35150415

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food systems at all levels are experiencing various states of dysfunction and crisis, and in turn their governance contributes to other intensifying crises, such as climate change, biodiversity loss and the rapid expansion of dietary-related non-communicable diseases. In many jurisdictions governments at local, state and national levels are taking action to tackle some of the key challenges confronting food systems through a range of regulatory, legislative and fiscal measures. This article comprises a narrative review summarising recent relevant literature with a focus on the intersection between corporate power and public health. The review sought to identify some of the principal barriers for the design and support of healthy food systems and environments, as well as key reforms that can be adopted to address these barriers, with a focus on the role of local governments. RECENT FINDINGS: The review found that, where permitted to do so by authorising legislative and regulatory frameworks, and where political and executive leadership prioritises healthy and sustainable food systems, local governments have demonstrated the capacity to exercise legislative and regulatory powers, such as planning powers to constrain the expansion of the fast food industry. In doing so, they have been able to advance broader goals of public health and wellbeing, as well as support the strengthening and expansion of healthy and sustainable food systems. Whilst local governments in various jurisdictions have demonstrated the capacity to take effective action to advance public health and environmental goals, such interventions take place in the context of a food system dominated by the corporate determinants of health. Accordingly, their wider health-promoting impact will remain limited in the absence of substantive reform at all levels of government.


Subject(s)
Local Government , Noncommunicable Diseases , Food Industry , Humans , Noncommunicable Diseases/prevention & control , Public Health
9.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 49(8): 525-529, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32738869

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As technological innovation increases the availability of novel therapeutic options in general practice, healthcare professionals will need to equip themselves with a sound understanding of their professional legal duties in light of emerging medical technologies, including virtual reality (VR). OBJECTIVE: Using a case study of VR to augment analgesia in burn treatment, this article examines how medical negligence laws apply to the use of new technology in healthcare settings. DISCUSSION: While there is currently no positive duty on healthcare professionals to use VR when treating patients, healthcare professionals may be held liable for harm arising from negligent advice or treatment using VR technology. The case study illustrates the flexible nature of negligence principles in adapting to harms arising from new risks such as simulation sickness. Specific warnings and standards of best practice will need to be developed if VR becomes a feature of general practice.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Professional Misconduct/legislation & jurisprudence , Virtual Reality , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Humans , Jurisprudence , Professional Misconduct/trends
10.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 44(2): 137-144, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32101352

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This paper examines policies from six local governments (LGs) relevant to promoting a healthy food supply and consumer food environment. METHODS: We analysed the six LGs' food and nutrition policies against a framework based on Australian literature and international policy frameworks. Policy content was collected by searching LG websites and analysed with reference to recommended policy actions in the framework. RESULTS: All LGs took action on reducing food waste, providing food/meal services for disadvantaged groups, and providing information/education on food and nutrition. A sub-set also supported urban/local food production and markets selling fresh, healthy food. Our search did not identify any indication of a comprehensive policy framework to guide action on food and nutrition, nor did we find policies restricting opening of unhealthy food outlets, encouraging the opening of healthy food outlets, or reducing unhealthy food marketing. CONCLUSIONS: Local governments in Australia are implementing policies to support improved nutrition. However, there are further opportunities for action, including discouraging unhealthy food outlets and restricting unhealthy food marketing. Implications for public health: The legal remit of LGs includes responsibilities relevant to food and nutrition. Further research is needed regarding how their powers could be better leveraged to improve diet-related health.


Subject(s)
Food Supply , Legislation as Topic , Local Government , Nutrition Policy , Australia , Food , Health Promotion , Humans , Policy Making , Public Health
11.
JBI Evid Synth ; 18(1): 97-107, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31389853

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to examine and map the reported forms, process functions, and objectives associated with private food safety standards to draw conclusions for public health nutrition. INTRODUCTION: One pressing public health nutrition issue is the need for a healthier food supply to reduce diet-related risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Many organizations are involved in private food safety and/or nutrition standards that govern their food supply. With few published data on private nutrition standards, understanding the motivations behind enacting private food safety standards as a means of gaining authority may elucidate strategic opportunities of interest for the public health nutrition audience. This could positively affect the use of private standards and nutritional quality of packaged foods. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Articles to be considered must focus on private food safety standards, which principally relate to the supply chain of packaged food for retail sale, in any country. In this group, the standard is largely invisible to consumers, and the dominant actors are private firms. Concepts of interest are the evolution, key drivers, regulatory form, function, objective and incentive for involvement in standard setting, adoption, implementation, conformity and enforcement of private food safety standards. METHODS: An extensive search of multiple databases and official websites to source gray literature will be undertaken to identify articles of any design, reports and conference proceedings in English from 2008 to present. Selection, screening and data synthesis will follow JBI methodology. Data extraction will be undertaken using an extraction tool developed for this scoping review.


Subject(s)
Food Safety , Food Supply , Diet , Nutritional Status , Public Health , Review Literature as Topic
12.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 8(7): 450-454, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31441282

ABSTRACT

The food, tobacco and alcohol industries have penetrated markets in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with a significant impact on these countries' burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Tangcharoensathien and colleagues describe the aggressive marketing of unhealthy food, alcohol and tobacco in LMICs, as well as key tactics used by these industries to resist laws and policies designed to reduce behavioural risk factors for NCDs. This commentary expands on the recommendations made by Tangcharoensathien and colleagues for preventing or managing conflicts of interest and reducing undue industry influence on NCD prevention policies and laws, focusing on the needs of LMICs. A growing body of research proposes ways to design voluntary industry initiatives to make them more effective, transparent and accountable, but governments should also consider whether collaboration with health-harming industries is ever appropriate. More fundamentally, mechanisms for identifying, managing and mitigating conflicts of interest and reducing industry influence must be woven into - and supported by - broader governance and regulatory structures at both national and international levels.


Subject(s)
Noncommunicable Diseases , Tobacco Industry , Tobacco Products , Health Policy , Humans , Policy Making , Nicotiana
13.
BMJ Glob Health ; 4(6): e001882, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31908864

ABSTRACT

Unhealthy diets are a leading cause of death and disability globally. The WHO recommends Member States implement front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labels to guide consumers towards healthier food choices, as part of comprehensive strategies to prevent diet-related non-communicable diseases. Interest in FOP nutrition labelling is increasing, but there is limited guidance for policymakers developing regulations necessary for effective implementation. A rapidly evolving evidence base, limited regulatory capacity and possibility of legal challenge by affected food industry stakeholders can create 'regulatory chill', whereby governments are dissuaded from progressive public health policymaking. We use a framework for analysing public health law and available best-practice guidance to evaluate key components of 31 FOP nutrition labelling regulations endorsed by governments up to June 2019. Analysis of regulatory form shows recent rapid uptake of label formats that are easier for consumers to understand and increasing use of mandatory legislation. However, policymakers must decide much more than whether to apply 'stars', 'traffic lights' or 'stop signs'. The substance of effective regulation must contain strategic regulatory objectives, clear specifications for displaying the label on pack, a valid scoring mechanism and a justified scope for including foods. While there are limited data on current practice, good governance of FOP nutrition labelling regulation also requires transparency and accountability in processes of label development, implementation, evaluation and enforcement to promote continuous improvement and withstand undue commercial interference. Whether developing new FOP nutrition labels or reforming existing ones, our findings support policymakers to design and implement best-practice, evidence-informed regulation.

14.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 41(4): 365-370, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28664666

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: While governments draft law and policy to promote public health, it is through cases put before the judiciary that the implementation of law can be challenged and where its practical implications are typically determined. In this paper, we examine the role of court judgements on efforts in Australia to regulate the harmful use of alcohol. METHODS: Australian case law (2010 to June 2015) involving the judicial review of administrative decisions relating to development applications or liquor licences for retail liquor outlets (bottle shops), hotels, pubs and clubs was identified using a case law database (WestLaw AU). Data were extracted and analysed using standard systematic review techniques. RESULTS: A total of 44 cases were included in the analysis. Of these, 90% involved appeals brought by industry actors against local or state government stakeholders seeking to reject applications for development applications and liquor licences. The proportion of judicial decisions resulting in outcomes in favour of industry was 77%. CONCLUSIONS: Public health research evidence appeared to have little or no influence, as there is no requirement for legislation to consider public health benefit. Implications for public health: A requirement that the impact on public health is considered in legislation will help to offset its strong pro-competition emphasis, which in turn has strongly influenced judicial decision making in this area.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/legislation & jurisprudence , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Alcoholism/prevention & control , Australia , Databases, Factual , Empirical Research , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence
15.
Nutrients ; 7(7): 5281-308, 2015 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26133973

ABSTRACT

Strategies to reduce excess salt consumption play an important role in preventing cardiovascular disease, which is the largest contributor to global mortality from non-communicable diseases. In many countries, voluntary food reformulation programs seek to reduce salt levels across selected product categories, guided by aspirational targets to be achieved progressively over time. This paper evaluates the industry-led salt reduction programs that operate in the United Kingdom and Australia. Drawing on theoretical concepts from the field of regulatory studies, we propose a step-wise or "responsive" approach that introduces regulatory "scaffolds" to progressively increase levels of government oversight and control in response to industry inaction or under-performance. Our model makes full use of the food industry's willingness to reduce salt levels in products to meet reformulation targets, but recognizes that governments remain accountable for addressing major diet-related health risks. Creative regulatory strategies can assist governments to fulfill their public health obligations, including in circumstances where there are political barriers to direct, statutory regulation of the food industry.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Food Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Food, Formulated/standards , Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/standards , Australia , Diet, Sodium-Restricted/standards , Feeding Behavior , Health Promotion/standards , Humans , Program Evaluation , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom
16.
Am J Public Health ; 105(3): 442-50, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25602886

ABSTRACT

Municipal and state governments are surging ahead in obesity prevention, providing a testing ground for innovative policies and shifting social norms in the process. Though high-profile measures such as New York City's soda portion rule attract significant media attention, we catalog the broader array of initiatives in less-known localities. Local innovation advances prevention policy, but faces legal and political constraints-constitutional challenges, preemption, charges of paternalism, lack of evidence, and widening health inequalities. These arguments can be met with astute framing, empirical evidence, and policy design, enabling local governments to remain at the forefront in transforming obesogenic environments.


Subject(s)
Environment Design/standards , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Motor Activity , Nutrition Policy/trends , Obesity/prevention & control , Environment Design/trends , Health Promotion/methods , Health Promotion/trends , Humans , Local Government , Marketing/methods , Marketing/standards , Models, Organizational , Nutrition Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Obesity/etiology , Organizational Innovation , Politics , State Government , Transportation/methods , Transportation/standards
20.
J Bioeth Inq ; 10(2): 149-63, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23585017

ABSTRACT

Reducing non-core food advertising to children is an important priority in strategies to address childhood obesity. Public health researchers argue for government intervention on the basis that food industry self-regulation is ineffective; however, the industry contends that the existing voluntary scheme adequately addresses community concerns. This paper examines the operation of two self-regulatory initiatives governing food advertising to children in Australia, in order to determine whether these regulatory processes foster transparent and accountable self-regulation. The paper concludes that while both codes appear to establish transparency and accountability mechanisms, they do not provide for meaningful stakeholder participation in the self-regulatory scheme. Accordingly, food industry self-regulation is unlikely to reflect public health concerns or to be perceived as a legitimate form of governance by external stakeholders. If industry regulation is to remain a feasible alternative to statutory regulation, there is a strong argument for strengthening government oversight and implementing a co-regulatory scheme.


Subject(s)
Advertising/ethics , Advertising/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Industry/ethics , Food Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Advertising/standards , Child , Food Industry/standards , Government Regulation , Humans , Obesity/prevention & control , Public Health , Social Responsibility
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...