Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(4)2023 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37112679

ABSTRACT

In line with how ethics has developed for the last three centuries, public health ethics has been widely dominated by a deontological as well as a utilitarian approach. The latter is a version of consequentialism, which states that maximizing utility is the primary goal of the majority of individuals or group action, while, on the other hand, virtue ethics, or at least the appeal to virtues, has been largely marginalized. The aim of this article is twofold. Firstly, we aim to highlight the political and ethical nature of public health interventions, often interpreted and presented as mere scientific enterprises. Secondly, we try to highlight the need to integrate or at least recognize the value of appeal to virtues in public health measures. The analysis will reference the Italian COVID-19 vaccination program as a case study. Initially, we will explore the political and ethical nature of any public health measure, using the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination program in Italy as an example. Subsequently, we will illustrate the deontological approach to ethics, the utilitarian one, and the virtues one, focusing on the dynamic of the agent's perspective. Lastly, we will briefly analyze both the Italian COVID-19 vaccination program and the communication campaign that promoted it.

2.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 38(1): e52, 2022 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35959563

ABSTRACT

Health technology assessment (HTA) aims, through empirical analysis, to shed light on the value of health technologies (O'Rourke et al. [2020, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 36, 187-90]). HTA is, then, where facts and values meet. But how, where, and when do facts and values meet in HTA? Currently, HTA is usually portrayed as a sequential process, starting with empirical analysis (assessment), followed by a deliberation on the implications of the findings for a judgment of a health technology's value (appraisal). In this paper, we will argue that in HTA, empirical analysis and normative inquiry are much more closely entwined. In fact, as we hope to show, normative commitments act as an indispensable guide for the collection and interpretation of empirical evidence. Drawing on policy sciences, we will suggest a concrete methodology that can help HTA practitioners to integrate empirical analysis and normative inquiry in a transparent way. The proposed methodology can be conceived as a concrete means for conducting a scoping exercise in HTA. Moreover, it offers a distinct way of giving stakeholders a structural and constructive role in HTA. This paper outlines the approach developed by the values in doing assessments of health technologies project, a project funded by the Erasmus+ program (contract number 2018-1-NL01-KA203-038960), which is the European Union's program to support education, training, youth, and sport in Europe. The project has resulted in an E-learning course, an accompanying handbook, and a consensus statement, all freely available from the project's website www.validatehta.eu.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Europe , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods
3.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 38(1): e63, 2022 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35726526

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a formative evaluation of applying the VALIDATE approach in practice by (i) assessing how students appreciated the e-learning course, (ii) exploring how, for what purposes and with what outcomes the acquired VALIDATE competences subsequently were used in internships in different institutional contexts, and how this was shaped by these contexts, and (iii) what this shows on real-world use of VALIDATE. METHODS: Comparative discussion of experiences of applying the VALIDATE approach via a semistructured survey and oral feedback from e-course students; final reports on internships in health technology assessment (HTA) practice, followed by semistructured interviews with interns and supervisors to complement and interpret results. RESULTS: All students considered the VALIDATE approach an enlightening and important addition to current HTA knowledge, especially regarding understanding the relation between empirical analysis and normative inquiry, identifying policy relevant questions and using the method of reconstructing interpretive frames for scoping. The latter appeared intellectually challenging and requiring some prior HTA knowledge. The use the VALIDATE approach in practice shows that interns productively redefined the HTA problem, based on appreciation of different stakeholders' definition of the issue; they experienced constraints from retrieving all relevant perspectives from existing literature as well as from institutional rules and routines. CONCLUSIONS: Some challenges in applying the VALIDATE approach deserve attention for its future use: currently used research approaches often assume a problem as "given"; and the data needed on different perspectives is often not reported in scientific literature. Finally, data gathering on and evaluation of value dimensions was experienced as challenging.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Humans , Knowledge , Research Design , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods
4.
Health Policy ; 126(8): 770-776, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35623910

ABSTRACT

Prioritization of COVID-19 vaccines is one of the most relevant topics in the current pandemic emergency. Prioritization decisions are political decisions that are value-laden, and as such of ethical nature. Despite the clear political and ethical nature of this topic, prioritization decisions are often interpreted and presented as scientific decisions. The aim of this article is twofold. First, we aim to show critical points that characterize certain pandemic vaccination plans from the ethical viewpoint using four dimensions (problem definitions, incorporation of different perspectives, context, and specification). The four dimensions were drawn from findings of the European project "VALIDATE" (VALues In Doing Assessments of healthcare TEchnologies", https://validatehta.eu). Second, we aim to reframe the issue about prioritization itself in the light of the four dimensions mentioned. Our conclusion is that policy-problem definitions, incorporation of different perspectives, contextual considerations and specification of moral principles seem to be common critical points of some vaccination plan documents. The European project "VALIDATE" seems to be able to provide a useful and profitable approach to address many of these critical points.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Vaccination
5.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 36(6): 534-539, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33292881

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus on who might be qualified to conduct ethical analysis in the field of health technology assessment (HTA). Is there a specific expertise or skill set for doing this work? The aim of this article is to (i) clarify the concept of ethics expertise and, based on this, (ii) describe and specify the characteristics of ethics expertise in HTA. METHODS: Based on the current literature and experiences in conducting ethical analysis in HTA, a group of members of the Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Interest Group on Ethical Issues in HTA critically analyzed the collected information during two face-to-face workshops. On the basis of the analysis, working definitions of "ethics expertise" and "core competencies" of ethics experts in HTA were developed. This paper reports the output of the workshop and subsequent revisions and discussions online among the authors. RESULTS: Expertise in a domain consists of both explicit and tacit knowledge and is acquired by formal training and social learning. There is a ubiquitous ethical expertise shared by most people in society; nevertheless, some people acquire specialist ethical expertise. To become an ethics expert in the field of HTA, one needs to acquire general knowledge about ethical issues as well as specific knowledge of the ethical domain in HTA. The core competencies of ethics experts in HTA consist of three fundamental elements: knowledge, skills, and attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: The competencies described here can be used by HTA agencies and others involved in HTA to call attention to and strengthen ethical analysis in HTA.


Subject(s)
Ethical Analysis , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Humans , Knowledge , Morals
6.
Blood Transfus ; 16(6): 483-489, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30201081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in blood donor selection and screening procedures, transfusion recipients can still develop complications related to infections by known and emerging pathogens. Pathogen reduction technologies (PRT) have been developed to reduce such risks. The present study, developed whithin a wider health technology assessment (HTA) process, was undertaken to estimate the costs of the continuing increase in the use of platelet PRT in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was established to perform the HTA and conduct a budget impact analysis. Quantitative data on platelet use were derived from the 2015 national blood transfusion report and from the Italian Platelets Transfusion Assessment Study (IPTAS). The current national fee of 60 Euro per platelet PRT procedure was used to quantify the costs to the Italian National Health Service (INHS). The analysis adopts a 3-year time-frame. In order to identify the impact on budget we compared a scenario representing an increased use of PRT platelets over time with a control scenario in which standard platelets are used. RESULTS: Progressive implementation of PRT for 20%, 40% and 66% of annual adult platelet doses could generate an increase in annual costs for the INHS amounting to approximately 7, 14 and 23 million Euros, respectively. Use of kits and devices suitable for the treatment of multiple adult platelet doses in one PRT procedure could lower costs. DISCUSSION: In order to fully evaluate the societal perspective of implementing platelet PRT, the increase in costs must be balanced against the expected benefits (prevention of transfusion-transmissible infections, white cell inactivation, extension of platelet storage, discontinuation of pathogen detection testing). Further studies based on actual numbers of platelet transfusion complications and their societal cost at a local level are needed to see the full cost to benefit ratio of platelet PRT implementation in Italy, and to promote equal treatment for all citizens.


Subject(s)
Blood Platelets , Disinfection/economics , Platelet Transfusion/economics , Adult , Costs and Cost Analysis , Disinfection/methods , Female , Humans , Italy , Male
7.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 99: 41-52, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29548841

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast different methods of qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) against criteria identified from the literature and to map their attributes to inform selection of the most appropriate QES method to answer research questions addressed by qualitative research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Electronic databases, citation searching, and a study register were used to identify studies reporting QES methods. Attributes compiled from 26 methodological papers (2001-2014) were used as a framework for data extraction. Data were extracted into summary tables by one reviewer and then considered within the author team. RESULTS: We identified seven considerations determining choice of methods from the methodological literature, encapsulated within the mnemonic Review question-Epistemology-Time/Timescale-Resources-Expertise-Audience and purpose-Type of data. We mapped 15 different published QES methods against these seven criteria. The final framework focuses on stand-alone QES methods but may also hold potential when integrating quantitative and qualitative data. CONCLUSION: These findings offer a contemporary perspective as a conceptual basis for future empirical investigation of the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of QES. It is hoped that this will inform appropriate selection of QES approaches.


Subject(s)
Data Collection/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Data Collection/standards , Qualitative Research
8.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 33(5): 562-569, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29065947

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The INTEGRATE-HTA project provided methodology to evaluate complex technologies. This study provides guidance on how to retrieve and critically appraise available evidence on moderators and predictors of treatment effects and on patient preferences for treatment outcomes as a source of complexity. METHODS: Search filters for PubMed were developed by hand-searching a large volume of articles reporting on relevant aspects. Search terms were retrieved from selected papers and algorithmically combined to find the optimal combination of search terms. For the development of the appraisal checklists literature was searched in PubMed and Google Scholar together with citation chasing. For the CHecklist for the Appraisal of Moderators and Predictors (CHAMP) a Delphi procedure was used to value a set of eligible appraisal criteria retrieved from the literature. RESULTS: Search filters were developed optimized for different accuracy measures. The final version of CHAMP consists of a seventeen questions covering the design, analysis, results and transferability of results of moderator and predictor analysis. The final checklist for appraisal of literature on patient preferences for treatment outcomes consist of six questions meant to help the user to identify relevant quality issues together with a guidance toward existing tools concerning the appraisal of specific preference elicitation methods. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating knowledge on subgroups for whom a specific treatment will produce more benefit holds the promise of better targeting and, ultimately, enhancing overall effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare technology. Finally, incorporating information on preferences for treatment outcomes will foster health technology assessment that addresses outcomes that are important to patients.


Subject(s)
Patient Preference , Research Design , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Jurisprudence , Search Engine , Socioeconomic Factors
9.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 33(5): 552-561, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28868993

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Internationally, funders require stakeholder involvement throughout health technology assessment (HTA). We report successes, challenges, and lessons learned from extensive stakeholder involvement throughout a palliative care case study that demonstrates new concepts and methods for HTA. METHODS: A 5-step "INTEGRATE-HTA Model" developed within the INTEGRATE-HTA project guided the case study. Using convenience or purposive sampling or directly / indirectly identifying and approaching individuals / groups, stakeholders participated in qualitative research or consultation meetings. During scoping, 132 stakeholders, aged ≥ 18 years in seven countries (England, Italy, Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, Lithuania, and Poland), highlighted key issues in palliative care that assisted identification of the intervention and comparator. Subsequently stakeholders in four countries participated in face-face, telephone and / or video Skype meetings to inform evidence collection and / or review assessment results. An applicability assessment to identify contextual and implementation barriers and enablers for the case study findings involved twelve professionals in the three countries. Finally, thirteen stakeholders participated in a mock decision-making meeting in England. RESULTS: Views about the best methods of stakeholder involvement vary internationally. Stakeholders make valuable contributions in all stages of HTA; assisting decision making about interventions, comparators, research questions; providing evidence and insights into findings, gap analyses and applicability assessments. Key challenges exist regarding inclusivity, time, and resource use. CONCLUSION: Stakeholder involvement is feasible and worthwhile throughout HTA, sometimes providing unique insights. Various methods can be used to include stakeholders, although challenges exist. Recognition of stakeholder expertise and further guidance about stakeholder consultation methods is needed.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Qualitative Research , Research Design , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Europe , Evidence-Based Practice/organization & administration , Humans , Jurisprudence , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Patient Preference , Socioeconomic Factors , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/economics , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/ethics
10.
Palliat Med ; 31(2): 181-192, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27280411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stakeholders are people with an interest in a topic. Internationally, stakeholder involvement in palliative care research and health technology assessment requires development. Stakeholder involvement adds value throughout research (from prioritising topics to disseminating findings). Philosophies and understandings about the best ways to involve stakeholders in research differ internationally. Stakeholder involvement took place in seven countries (England, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway and Poland). Findings informed a project that developed concepts and methods for health technology assessment and applied these to evaluate models of palliative care service delivery. AIMS: To report on stakeholder involvement in the INTEGRATE-HTA project and how issues identified informed project development. DESIGN: Using stakeholder consultation or a qualitative research design, as appropriate locally, stakeholders in seven countries acted as 'advisors' to aid researchers' decision making. Thematic analysis was used to identify key issues across countries. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 132 stakeholders (82 professionals and 50 'lay' people) aged ⩾18 participated in individual face-to-face or telephone interviews, consultation meetings or focus groups. RESULTS: Different stakeholder involvement methods were used successfully to identify key issues in palliative care. A total of 23 issues common to three or more countries informed decisions about the intervention and comparator of interest, sub questions and specific assessments within the health technology assessment. CONCLUSION: Stakeholders, including patients and families undergoing palliative care, can inform project decision making using various involvement methods according to the local context. Researchers should consider local understandings about stakeholder involvement as views of appropriate and feasible methods vary. Methods for stakeholder involvement, especially consultation, need further development.


Subject(s)
Health Services Research/methods , Palliative Care , Stakeholder Participation , Europe , Focus Groups , Humans , Qualitative Research
11.
Blood Transfus ; 14(4): 287-386, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27403740

ABSTRACT

Although existing clinical evidence shows that the transfusion of blood components is becoming increasingly safe, the risk of transmission of known and unknown pathogens, new pathogens or re-emerging pathogens still persists. Pathogen reduction technologies may offer a new approach to increase blood safety. The study is the output of collaboration between the Italian National Blood Centre and the Post-Graduate School of Health Economics and Management, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. A large, multidisciplinary team was created and divided into six groups, each of which addressed one or more HTA domains.Plasma treated with amotosalen + UV light, riboflavin + UV light, methylene blue or a solvent/detergent process was compared to fresh-frozen plasma with regards to current use, technical features, effectiveness, safety, economic and organisational impact, and ethical, social and legal implications. The available evidence is not sufficient to state which of the techniques compared is superior in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness. Evidence on efficacy is only available for the solvent/detergent method, which proved to be non-inferior to untreated fresh-frozen plasma in the treatment of a wide range of congenital and acquired bleeding disorders. With regards to safety, the solvent/detergent technique apparently has the most favourable risk-benefit profile. Further research is needed to provide a comprehensive overview of the cost-effectiveness profile of the different pathogen-reduction techniques. The wide heterogeneity of results and the lack of comparative evidence are reasons why more comparative studies need to be performed.


Subject(s)
Blood Safety/methods , Blood Transfusion , Plasma/microbiology , Plasma/virology , Animals , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Blood Transfusion/methods , Disinfection/methods , Humans , Transfusion Reaction , Viruses/isolation & purification
12.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 16: 88, 2016 07 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27473226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The importance of respecting patients' preferences when making treatment decisions is increasingly recognized. Efficiently retrieving papers from the scientific literature reporting on the presence and nature of such preferences can help to achieve this goal. The objective of this study was to create a search filter for PubMed to help retrieve evidence on patient preferences for treatment outcomes. METHODS: A total of 27 journals were hand-searched for articles on patient preferences for treatment outcomes published in 2011. Selected articles served as a reference set. To develop optimal search strategies to retrieve this set, all articles in the reference set were randomly split into a development and a validation set. MeSH-terms and keywords retrieved using PubReMiner were tested individually and as combinations in PubMed and evaluated for retrieval performance (e.g. sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp)). RESULTS: Of 8238 articles, 22 were considered to report empirical evidence on patient preferences for specific treatment outcomes. The best search filters reached Se of 100 % [95 % CI 100-100] with Sp of 95 % [94-95 %] and Sp of 97 % [97-98 %] with 75 % Se [74-76 %]. In the validation set these queries reached values of Se of 90 % [89-91 %] with Sp 94 % [93-95 %] and Se of 80 % [79-81 %] with Sp of 97 % [96-96 %], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow and broad search queries were developed which can help in retrieving literature on patient preferences for treatment outcomes. Identifying such evidence may in turn enhance the incorporation of patient preferences in clinical decision making and health technology assessment.


Subject(s)
PubMed , Humans , Patient Preference , Treatment Outcome
13.
BMC Med Ethics ; 17: 16, 2016 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27004792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the field of health technology assessment (HTA), there are several approaches that can be used for ethical analysis. However, there is a scarcity of literature that critically evaluates and compares the strength and weaknesses of these approaches when they are applied in practice. In this paper, we analyse the applicability of some selected approaches for addressing ethical issues in HTA in the field of complex health interventions. Complex health interventions have been the focus of methodological attention in HTA. However, the potential methodological challenges for ethical analysis are as yet unknown. METHODS: Six of the most frequently described and applied ethical approaches in HTA were critically assessed against a set of five characteristics of complex health interventions: multiple and changing perspectives, indeterminate phenomena, uncertain causality, unpredictable outcomes, and ethical complexity. The assessments are based on literature and the authors' experiences of developing, applying and assessing the approaches. RESULTS: The Interactive, participatory HTA approach is by its nature and flexibility, applicable across most complexity characteristics. Wide Reflective Equilibrium is also flexible and its openness to different perspectives makes it better suited for complex health interventions than more rigid conventional approaches, such as Principlism and Casuistry. Approaches developed for HTA purposes are fairly applicable for complex health interventions, which one could expect because they include various ethical perspectives, such as the HTA Core Model® and the Socratic approach. CONCLUSION: This study shows how the applicability for addressing ethical issues in HTA of complex health interventions differs between the selected ethical approaches. Knowledge about these differences may be helpful when choosing and applying an approach for ethical analyses in HTA. We believe that the study contributes to increasing awareness and interest of the ethical aspects of complex health interventions in general.


Subject(s)
Ethical Analysis/methods , Ethics, Clinical , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/ethics , Humans
14.
Cuad Bioet ; 26(86): 117-20, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26030017

ABSTRACT

A new system for evaluating production of research has been introduced in Italy by the Law of 30 December 2010 no. 240 (also called Gelmini's Reform). This system is based on a strict distinction between the evaluation of ″academic production″ concerning ″hard sciences″ and evaluation of ″academic production″ concerning ″humanities and social sciences″. The first evaluation uses bibliometric criteria, while the second one uses non-bibliometric criteria. The article deals with the impact of this new system on Italian academic bioethics.


Subject(s)
Bioethics , Program Evaluation/standards , Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Bibliometrics , Humanities , Humans , Italy , Publishing/standards , Research/standards , Science/standards
15.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 31(3): 131-7, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26063128

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and discuss appropriate approaches to integrate ethical inquiry in health technology assessment (HTA). METHODS: The key question is how ethics can be integrated in HTA. This is addressed in two steps: by investigating what it means to integrate ethics in HTA, and by assessing how suitable the various methods in ethics are to be integrated in HTA according to these meanings of integration. RESULTS: In the first step, we found that integrating ethics can mean that ethics is (a) subsumed under or (b) combined with other parts of the HTA process; that it can be (c) coordinated with other parts; or that (d) ethics actively interacts and changes other parts of the HTA process. For the second step, we found that the various methods in ethics have different merits with respect to the four conceptions of integration in HTA. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional approaches in moral philosophy tend to be most suited to be subsumed or combined, while processual approaches being close to the HTA or implementation process appear to be most suited to coordinated and interactive types of integration. The article provides a guide for choosing the ethics approach that appears most appropriate for the goals and process of a particular HTA.


Subject(s)
Ethical Analysis , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/ethics , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Humans , Italy , Morals , Philosophy, Medical
16.
Cuad. bioét ; 26(86): 117-120, ene.-abr. 2015.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-139496

ABSTRACT

Un nuevo sistema para evaluar los resultados de la investigación ha sido introducido en Italia, bajo la Ley nº 240 del 30 de Diciembre de 2010, la así llamada "Reforma Gelmini". Este sistema tiene su fundamento en la separación entre la evaluación de resultados de investigacion con referencia a las ciencias experimentales y la evaluación de resultados de investigación con referencia a las humanidades y ciencias sociales. La primera se basa en criterios bibliometricos, la segunda utiliza criterios no-bibliometricos. El artículo trata del impacto de este nuevo sistema en la bioetica academica italiana


A new system for evaluating production of research has been introduced in Italy by the Law of 30 December 2010 no. 240 (also called Gelmini’s Reform). This system is based on a strict distinction between the evaluation of "academic production" concerning "hard sciences" and evaluation of "academic production" concerning "humanities and social sciences". The first evaluation uses bibliometric criteria, while the second one uses non-bibliometric criteria. The article deals with the impact of this new system on Italian academic bioethics


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Bioethics/education , Bioethics/history , Health Research Evaluation , Integrated Advanced Information Management Systems/ethics , Integrated Advanced Information Management Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Publications/classification , Bioethics/trends , Integrated Advanced Information Management Systems/standards , Integrated Advanced Information Management Systems , Publications , Italy/ethnology
17.
Dig Liver Dis ; 47(5): 351-5, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534233

ABSTRACT

Since chronic hepatitis C has mostly become curable, issues concerning choice and allocation of treatment are of major concern. We assessed the foremost ethical issues in hepatitis C virus therapy with 1st generation protease inhibitors using the personalist ethical framework within the health technology assessment methodology. Our aim was to identify values at stake/in conflict and to support both the physicians' choices in hepatitis C therapy and social (macro-) allocation decision-making. The ethical assessment indicates that: (1) safety/effectiveness profile of treatment is guaranteed if its use is restricted to the patients subgroups who may benefit from it; (2) patients should be carefully informed, particularly on treatment deferral, and widespread information on these therapies should be implemented; (3) since treatment was proven to be cost-effective, its use is acceptable respecting resource macro-allocation. Concerning individual (micro-) location criteria: (a) criteria for eligibility to treatment should be clearly identified and updated periodically; (b) information on criteria for eligibility/deferral to treatment for specific patients' subgroups should be made widely known. Interferon-based regimens will disappear from use within the next year, with the introduction of highly effective/tolerable combination regimens of direct-acting antivirals, thus profoundly changing social choices. Nonetheless, our model could support future ethical assessment since the evaluation pertaining ethical domains remains generally applicable.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/ethics , Drug Therapy, Combination/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/economics , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Decision Making , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Hepacivirus/pathogenicity , Hepatitis C/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Protease Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protease Inhibitors/economics
20.
Cuad Bioet ; 23(78): 323-36, 2012.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23130746

ABSTRACT

The debate over compulsory or merely recommended vaccination remains open, albeit latent, in those countries that have mandatory vaccine schedules. Despite the advantages of preventive immunization from the point of medical, economic and social features, it's clear, in the current status of medical ethics, that the exercise of patient autonomy calls for personal responsibility in the election of treatments and, in fact, the vaccines. Therefore, it is necessary to change the simple idea of prevention as <>, characteristic of a <> in order to pass to a preventative medicine concept that will be able to support the achievement of moral attitudes towards achieving the good <> for the individual and for the community. This is only possible from a <> wherever is possible to present an alternative between mandatory vs. recommendation from the concept of <> that, with the help of a series of measures, could combine the effective protection for the whole community with the responsible exercise of the personal autonomy.


Subject(s)
Social Responsibility , Vaccination/ethics , Altruism , Attitude to Health , Humans , Immunity, Herd , Mandatory Programs/ethics , Mandatory Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Motivation , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Personal Autonomy , Preventive Medicine/ethics , Preventive Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health , Refusal to Participate/ethics , Refusal to Participate/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Reduction Behavior , Social Values , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudence , Vaccination/trends , Vaccines/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...