Clinical diagnosis and management of multiple cerebral ring-enhancing lesions-study of 50 patients at a tertiary healthcare center.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Multiple ring-enhancing lesions are commonly experienced group of brain pathologies which we come across in day-to-day practice. Clinical symptoms in these lesions are quite non-specific, and hence, it is difficult to reach a final diagnosis. However, these lesions have a varied group of differential diagnosis and it is sometimes difficult to have an accurate diagnosis on conventional MRI. This article was written with the objective of discussing the demographical study and etiology, clinical diagnosis and management for these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a prospective study carried out at the Department of Neurosurgery, Dr. D Y Patil Medical College and Hospital, Pune, from September 2019 to August 2022 and included 50 patients who presented to us multiple ring-enhancing brain lesions. RESULTS: In our study, 50 patients between age (1-70 years) with multiple ring-enhancing lesions were analyzed. Majority of the patients were between age group 30-39 years. Males (76%) were majority in our study than females (24%). Most common pathology was primary neoplasm (glioma) and metastasis, followed by nine patients of pyogenic abscess and tuberculosis each. Neurocysticercosis was seen in eight patients and three patients were diagnosed with CNS lymphoma. Most of our patients presented with headache (38 patients) and a subset of patients had associated seizures (28 patients). Two patients with primary neoplasm were diagnosed to have WHO grade 3 glioma and seven patients were diagnosed to have WHO grade 4 glioma. Glioblastoma multiforme presented as multifocal and multicentric lesions. Among the patients with primary neoplasm, three patients underwent stereotactic biopsy for diagnosis and the rest of seven patients underwent maximum safe resection followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Ten patients were diagnosed with metastatic lesions, among them six patients underwent stereotactic biopsy for histopathological diagnosis and immunohistochemistry, and rest of the patients were managed on the basis of the primary lesion. Five patients were immune-compromised, among them two patients presented with abscess and three patients presented with primary neoplastic lesion. Thirty-six patients underwent biopsy, among them seven patients underwent frameless, seven patients underwent frame stereotactic biopsy, and the rest 22 patients underwent excision biopsy. CONCLUSION: Multiple ring-enhancing lesions of brain pose a challenge in terms of achieving an accurate diagnosis and planning further treatment. It is of utmost importance to have a diagnosis in mind based on radiological investigations, so that surgical intervention can be planned accordingly be it by invasive or minimal invasive techniques. An idea toward the diagnosis also helps in prognosticating these patients which could avoid costly whole-body scans and unnecessary surgical intervention.

Endovascular management of a sphenopalatine artery pseudoaneurysm: a rare cause of delayed intractable epistaxis following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.

Vascular injuries during pituitary surgery are feared as they can lead to serious disability and can be life threatening. We are describing a case of severe intractable epistaxis following endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumour due to a sphenopalatine artery pseudoaneurysm which was successfully managed using endovascular embolisation techniques. Very few cases of sphenopalatine artery pseudoaneurysm following endoscopic nasal surgery have been described. A middle aged male patient with a pituitary macroadenoma underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery and returned to us after 3 days of discharge with severe epistaxis. Digital subtraction angiography showed contrast leakage and left sphenopalatine artery pseudoaneurysm. Glue embolisation of the distal sphenopalatine branches and pseudoaneurysm was done. Good occlusion of pseudoaneurysm was seen. Such a diagnosis for epistaxis following endoscopic transnasal surgery should be borne in mind, so prompt treatment can be planned to avoid life threatening complications.

Post Mucormycosis Frontal Bone Osteonecrosis: "A Road Less Traveled During the Pandemic".

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis in mucormycosis is a rare phenomenon and has been reported usually following trauma or in immunocompromised individuals. Osteonecrosis of skull as a complication of mucormycosis is a rare presentation, which makes the study ever so rare and interesting. METHODS: Within 6 months, a total of 114 patients presented with mucormycosis as COVID-19 sequel, 60 of whom underwent form of endoscopic sinus debridement. Six of these 60 patients presented with frontal bone osteonecrosis and were included in the study. All 6 patients presented within a time period of 2-4 months' post FESS. RESULTS: One of the 6 patients succumbed to her illness. Another patient presented with local recurrence after 3 months, for which she underwent resurgery and debridement. The other 4 patients showed gradual recovery and are without symptoms or radiologic progression at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Osteonecrosis in mucormycosis is a rare phenomenon, and the 2 entities have rarely been reported together. The disease usually limits itself to the frontal bone only, and pathogenesis for spread is due to a vicious cycle of infection and ischemia. Prompt diagnosis via imaging, aggressive surgical debridement with a good antifungal cover, good patient compliance, and regular follow-up form the mainstay of treatment.