ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multicasualty events present complex medical challenges. This is the first study to investigate the role of nontechnical skills in prehospital multicasualty trauma care. We assessed the feasibility of using the Trauma Nontechnical Skills Scale (T-NOTECHS) instrument, which has not yet been investigated to evaluate these scenarios. METHODS: We conducted an observational study involving military medical teams with Israel Defense Forces Military Trauma Life Support training to assess the T-NOTECHS' utility in predicting prehospital medical team performance during multicasualty event simulations. These teams were selected from a pool of qualified military Advanced Life Support providers. Simulations were conducted in a dedicated facility resembling a field setting, with video recordings to ensure data accuracy. Teams faced a single multicasualty scenario, assessed by two instructors, and were evaluated using a 37-item checklist. The T-NOTECHS scores were analyzed using regression models to predict simulation performance. RESULTS: We included 27 teams for analysis, led by 28% physicians and 72% paramedics. Interrater reliability for simulation performance and T-NOTECHS scores showed good agreement. Overall T-NOTECHS scores were positively correlated with simulation performance scores (R = 0.546, p < 0.001). Each T-NOTECHS domain correlated with simulation performance. The Communication and Interaction domain explained a unique part of the variance (ß = 0.406, p = 0.047). Assessment and Decision Making had the highest correlation (R = 0.535, p < 0.001). These domains significantly predicted specific items on the simulation performance checklist. Cooperation and Resource Management showed the least correlation with checklist items. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the T-NOTECHS' reliability in predicting prehospital trauma team performance during multicasualty scenarios. Key nontechnical skills, especially Communication and Interaction, and Assessment and Decision Making, play vital roles. These findings underscore the importance of training in these skills to enhance trauma care in such scenarios, offering valuable insights for medical team preparation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level II.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Disparities in trauma systems, including gaps between trauma center levels, affect patient outcomes. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) is a standard method of care that improves the performance of lower-level trauma systems. We sought to study potential gaps in ATLS education within a national trauma system. METHODS: This prospective observational study examined the characteristics of 588 surgical board residents and fellows taking the ATLS course. The course is required for board certification in adult trauma specialties (general surgery, emergency medicine, and anesthesiology), pediatric trauma specialties (pediatric emergency medicine and pediatric surgery), and trauma consulting specialties (all other surgical board specialties). We compared the differences in course accessibility and success rates within a national trauma system which includes seven level 1 trauma centers (L1TC) and twenty-three non-level 1 hospitals (NL1H). RESULTS: Resident and fellow students were 53% male, 46% employed in L1TC, and 86% were in the final stages of their specialty program. Only 32% were enrolled in adult trauma specialty programs. Students from L1TC had a 10% higher ATLS course pass rate than NL1H (p = 0.003). Trauma center level was associated with higher odds to pass the ATLS course, even after adjustment to other variables (OR = 1.925 [95% CI = 1.151 to 3.219]). Compared to NL1H, the course was two-three times more accessible to students from L1TC and 9% more accessible to adult trauma specialty programs (p = 0.035). The course was more accessible to students at early levels of training in NL1H (p < 0.001). Female students and trauma consulting specialties enrolled in L1TC programs were more likely to pass the course (OR = 2.557 [95% CI = 1.242 to 5.264] and 2.578 [95% CI = 1.385 to 4.800], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Passing the ATLS course is affected by trauma center level, independent of other student factors. Educational disparities between L1TC and NL1H include ATLS course access for core trauma residency programs at early training stages. Some gaps are more pronounced among consulting trauma specialties and female surgeons. Educational resources should be planned to favor lower-level trauma centers, specialties dealing in trauma care, and residents early in their postgraduate training.
