Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Radiol ; 71(9): 889-95, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27210245

ABSTRACT

AIM: To examine the interpretive performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as an adjunct to digital mammography (DM) compared to DM alone in a series of invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) and to assess whether DBT can be used to characterise ILC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, multi-reader study was conducted of 83 mammographic examinations of women with 107 newly diagnosed ILCs ascertained at histology. Consenting women underwent both DM and DBT acquisitions. Twelve radiologists, with varying mammography experience, interpreted DM images alone, reporting lesion location, mammographic features, and malignancy probability using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 1-5; they then reviewed DBT images in addition to DM, and reported the same parameters. Statistical analyses compared sensitivity, false-positive rates (FPR), and interpretive performance using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC), for reading with DM versus DM plus DBT. RESULTS: Multi-reader pooled ROC analysis for DM plus DBT yielded AUC=0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.91), which was significantly higher (p<0.0001) than DM alone with AUC=0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.86). DBT plus DM significantly increased pooled sensitivity (85%) compared to DM alone (70%; p<0.0001). FPR did not vary significantly with the addition of DBT to DM. Interpreting with DBT (compared to DM alone) increased the correct identification of ILCs depicted as architectural distortions (84% versus 65%, respectively) or as masses (89% versus 70%), increasing interpretive performance for both experienced and less-experienced readers; larger gains in AUC were shown for less-experienced radiologists. Multifocal and/or multicentric and bilateral disease was more frequently identified on DM with DBT. CONCLUSION: Adding DBT to DM significantly improved the accuracy of mammographic interpretation for ILCs and contributed to characterising disease extent.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Mammography/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging/methods , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
2.
Radiol Med ; 118(3): 401-14, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22872454

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated the relative risk of developing radiation-induced breast cancer (BC) in women treated with radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease (HD) and analysed the imaging features of these breast neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 54 women who had all undergone radiotherapy between 1980 and 2010 (median age, 36.6 years). Women aged ≤30 years were screened with clinical breast examination, ultrasound (US) and, if necessary, mammography; women >30 years had clinical breast examination, US and mammography. Three women underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as well. RESULTS: Mammography detected seven invasive breast cancers in 6/54 women (11.1%). Median age at diagnosis was 26.1 years for HD and 42.4 for breast cancer. Breast cancer was diagnosed following a median latent period from radiotherapy of 15.1 years. Mean radiation dose was 37.6 Gy in women who developed breast cancer and 31.3 Gy in the other women. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, women who were exposed to radiation for HD had a 6.2-fold higher risk of developing breast cancer than the general population. In consideration of the young age and high breast density, women aged ≤30 years should be monitored by US and MR imaging; women aged >30 years should be monitored by US, mammography and, when necessary, MR imaging.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Hodgkin Disease/radiotherapy , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/therapy , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
3.
Radiol Med ; 116(3): 477-88, 2011 Apr.
Article in English, Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21225359

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The authors sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of vacuum-assisted core biopsy (VACB) in comparison with diagnostic surgical excision for characterisation of nonpalpable breast lesions classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories R3 and R4. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2008, we conducted 602 stereotactic, 11-gauge, VACB procedures on 243 nonpalpable breast lesions categorised as BI-RADS R3, 346 categorised as BI-RADS R4 and 13 categorised as BI-RADS R5. We calculated the diagnostic accuracy and cost savings of VACB by subtracting the cost of the stereotactic biopsy from that of the diagnostic surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 56% of the lesions were benign and required no further assessment. Lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) (23.6%) were debated at multidisciplinary meetings, and diagnostic surgical biopsy was recommended for 83.1% of them. All malignant lesions (B4 and B5) underwent surgical excision. VACB had a sensitivity of 94.9%, specificity of 98.3% and diagnostic accuracy of 97.7%. The cost savings per VACB procedure were 464.00 euro; by obviating 335 surgical biopsies, the overall cost savings was 155,440.00 euro over 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: VACB proved to have high diagnostic accuracy for characterising abnormalities at low to intermediate risk of malignancy and obviated surgical excision in about half of the cases, allowing for considerable cost savings.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Needle/economics , Breast Diseases/pathology , Stereotaxic Techniques/economics , Adult , Aged , Calcinosis/pathology , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Vacuum
4.
Radiol Med ; 115(4): 551-62, 2010 Jun.
Article in English, Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20177990

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonoelastography in differentiating and characterising nodular breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 nodular lesions diagnosed on mammography and/or ultrasonography in 110 women (mean age 51.27 years) were evaluated with sonoelastography and classified according to elasticity score (S1-S5). Needle biopsy was performed in 104/120 cases, whereas 16/120 were sent for follow-up. Sensitivity and specificity of sonoelastography were determined by taking biopsy findings as the gold standard. RESULTS: Biopsy yielded the following results: 66 benign, three equivocal and 35 malignant lesions. Sensitivity and specificity of sonoelastography were, respectively, 88.5% and 92.7%. All nodules with an elasticity score of 5 were malignant, and those with a score

Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Breast Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Breast Diseases/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography, Mammary , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...