ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare dose-volume histogram variables for the internal and external urinary sphincters (IUS/EUS) with urinary quality of life after prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Subjects were 42 consecutive men from a prospective study of brachytherapy as monotherapy with (125)I for intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. No patient received hormonal therapy. Preplanning constraints included prostate V100 higher than 95%, V150 lower than 60%, and V200 lower than 20% and rectal R100 less than 1cm(3). Patients completed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite quality-of-life questionnaire before and at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months after implantation, and urinary domain scores were analyzed. All structures including the IUS and EUS were contoured on T2-weighted MRI at day 30, and doses received were calculated from identification of seeds on CT. Spearman's (nonparametric) rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Overall urinary morbidity was worst at 1 month after the implant. Urinary function declined when the IUS V285 was 0.4% (ρ=-0.32, p=0.04); bother worsened when the IUS V35 was 99% (ρ=-0.31, p=0.05) or the EUS V240 was 63% (ρ=-0.31, p=0.05); irritation increased when the IUS V35 was 95% (ρ=-0.37, p=0.02) and the EUS V265 was 24% (ρ=-0.32, p=0.04); and urgency worsened when the IUS V35 was 99.5% (ρ=-0.38, p=0.02). Incontinence did not correlate with EUS or IUS dose. CONCLUSIONS: Doses to the IUS and EUS on MRI/CT predicted worse urinary function, with greater bother, irritative symptoms, and urgency. Incorporating MRI-based dose-volume histogram analysis into the treatment planning process may reduce acute urinary morbidity after brachytherapy.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Urinary Bladder/radiation effects , Urination Disorders/physiopathology , Urination/radiation effects , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy Dosage , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder/physiopathology , Urination Disorders/etiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To minimize toxicity while maintaining tumor coverage with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally or superiorly located stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we investigated passive-scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients with centrally or superiorly located (within 2 cm of critical structures) stage I NSCLC were treated clinically with three-dimensional photon SBRT (50 Gy in 4 fractions). The photon SBRT plan was compared with the PSPT and IMPT plans. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose that exceeded the dose--volume constraints in the critical structures. RESULTS: Only 6 photon plans satisfied the >95% planning target volume (PTV) coverage and MTD constraints, compared to 12 PSPT plans (p = 0.009) and 14 IMPT plans (p = 0.001). Compared with the photon SBRT plans, the PSPT and IMPT plans significantly reduced the mean total lung dose from 5.4 Gy to 3.5 Gy (p < 0.001) and 2.8 Gy (p < 0.001) and reduced the total lung volume receiving 5 Gy, 10 Gy, and 20 Gy (p < 0.001). When the PTV was within 2 cm of the critical structures, the PSPT and IMPT plans significantly reduced the mean maximal dose to the aorta, brachial plexus, heart, pulmonary vessels, and spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS: For centrally or superiorly located stage I NSCLC, proton therapy, particularly IMPT, delivered ablative doses to the target volume and significantly reduced doses to the surrounding normal tissues compared with photon SBRT.
