ABSTRACT
Rationale: Diaphragm muscle weakness might underlie persistent exertional dyspnea, despite normal lung and cardiac function in individuals who were previously hospitalized for acute coronavirus disease (COVID-19) illness. Objectives: The authors sought, first, to determine the persistence and pathophysiological nature of diaphragm muscle weakness and its association with exertional dyspnea 2 years after hospitalization for COVID-19 and, second, to investigate the impact of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on diaphragm and inspiratory muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea in individuals with long COVID. Methods: Approximately 2 years after hospitalization for COVID-19, 30 individuals (11 women, 19 men; median age, 58 years; interquartile range [IQR] = 51-63) underwent comprehensive (invasive) respiratory muscle assessment and evaluation of dyspnea. Eighteen with persistent diaphragm muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea were randomized to 6 weeks of IMT or sham training; assessments were repeated immediately after and 6 weeks after IMT completion. The primary endpoint was change in inspiratory muscle fatiguability immediately after IMT. Measurements and Main Results: At a median of 31 months (IQR = 23-32) after hospitalization, 21 of 30 individuals reported relevant persistent exertional dyspnea. Diaphragm muscle weakness on exertion and reduced diaphragm cortical activation were potentially related to exertional dyspnea. Compared with sham control, IMT improved diaphragm and inspiratory muscle function (sniff transdiaphragmatic pressure, 83 cm H2O [IQR = 75-91] vs. 100 cm H2O [IQR = 81-113], P = 0.02), inspiratory muscle fatiguability (time to task failure, 365 s [IQR = 284-701] vs. 983 s [IQR = 551-1,494], P = 0.05), diaphragm voluntary activation index (79% [IQR = 63-92] vs. 89% [IQR = 75-94], P = 0.03), and dyspnea (Borg score, 7 [IQR = 5.5-8] vs. 6 [IQR = 4-7], P = 0.03). Improvements persisted for 6 weeks after IMT completion. Conclusions: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to identify a potential treatment for persisting exertional dyspnea in long COVID and provide a possible pathophysiological explanation for the treatment benefit. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04854863, NCT05582642).
Subject(s)
Breathing Exercises , COVID-19 , Diaphragm , Dyspnea , Muscle Weakness , Humans , Male , Female , Dyspnea/physiopathology , Dyspnea/therapy , Dyspnea/etiology , Middle Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/therapy , Muscle Weakness/physiopathology , Muscle Weakness/therapy , Muscle Weakness/etiology , Diaphragm/physiopathology , Breathing Exercises/methods , Respiratory Muscles/physiopathology , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Background: Dyspnea is a common persistent symptom after acute coronavirus disease 2019 illness (COVID-19). One potential explanation for post-COVID-19 dyspnea is a reduction in diffusion capacity. This longitudinal study investigated diffusion capacity and its relationship with dyspnea on exertion in individuals previously hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: Eligible participants had been hospitalized for the treatment of acute COVID-19 and were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge. Pulmonary function testing, diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), blood gas analysis and the level of dyspnea (Borg scale; before and after a 6 min walk test [6 MWT]) were performed. Participants were divided into subgroups based on the presence or absence of dyspnea during the 6 MWT at 12 months after hospitalization. Results: Seventy-two participants (twenty-two female, mean age 59.8 ± 13.5 years) were included. At 12 months after discharge, 41/72 participants (57%) had DLCO below the lower limit of normal and 56/72 (78%) had DLCO < 80% of the predicted value. Individuals with exertional dyspnea had significantly lower DLCO than those without exertional dyspnea (p = 0.001). In participants with DLCO data being available at three timepoints over 12 months (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) after discharge (n = 25), DLCO improved between 6 weeks and 6 months after hospital discharge, but not thereafter (p = 0.017). Conclusions: About 2/3 of the post-COVID individuals in this study had impaired diffusion capacity at 12 months after hospital discharge. There was an association between persisting dyspnea on exertion and significantly reduced DLCO. Impaired diffusion capacity improved over the first 6 months after hospitalization but not thereafter.
ABSTRACT
Increased sympathetic drive is of prognostic significance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but its determinants remain poorly understood. One potential mechanism may be chemoreflex-mediated adrenergic stimulation caused by sustained hypercapnia. This study determined the impact of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in patients with stable hypercapnic COPD. Ten patients (age 70 ± 7 years, GOLD stage 3-4) receiving long-term NIV (mean inspiratory positive airway pressure 21 ± 7 cmH2O) underwent invasive MSNA measurement via the peroneal nerve during spontaneous breathing and NIV. Compared with spontaneous breathing, NIV significantly reduced hypercapnia (PaCO2 51.5 ± 6.9 vs 42.6 ± 6.1 mmHg, p < 0.0001) along with the burst rate (64.4 ± 20.9 vs 59.2 ± 19.9 bursts/min, p = 0.03) and burst incidence (81.7 ± 29.3 vs 74.1 ± 26.9 bursts/100 heartbeats, p = 0.04) of MSNA. This shows for the first time that correcting hypercapnia with NIV decreases MSNA in COPD.
Subject(s)
Hypercapnia , Muscle, Skeletal , Noninvasive Ventilation , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Sympathetic Nervous System , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Hypercapnia/therapy , Hypercapnia/physiopathology , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Male , Aged , Sympathetic Nervous System/physiopathology , Female , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Muscle, Skeletal/innervationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with chronic hypercapnic failure. The present work aimed to comprehensively investigate inspiratory muscle function as a potential key determinant of hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with COPD. METHODS: Prospective patient recruitment encompassed 61 stable subjects with COPD across different stages of respiratory failure, ranging from normocapnia to isolated nighttime hypercapnia and daytime hypercapnia. Arterialized blood gas analyses and overnight transcutaneous capnometry were used for patient stratification. Assessment of respiratory muscle function encompassed body plethysmography, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), diaphragm ultrasound, and transdiaphragmatic pressure recordings following cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves (twPdi) and a maximum sniff manoeuvre (Sniff Pdi). RESULTS: Twenty patients showed no hypercapnia, 10 had isolated nocturnal hypercapnia, and 31 had daytime hypercapnia. Body plethysmography clearly distinguished patients with and without hypercapnia but did not discriminate patients with isolated nocturnal hypercapnia from those with daytime hypercapnia. In contrast to ultrasound parameters and transdiaphragmatic pressures, only MIP reflected the extent of hypercapnia across all three stages. MIP values below -48 cmH2O predicted nocturnal hypercapnia (area under the curve = 0.733, p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: In COPD, inspiratory muscle dysfunction contributes to progressive hypercapnic failure. In contrast to invasive tests of diaphragm strength only MIP fully reflects the pathophysiological continuum of hypercapnic failure and predicts isolated nocturnal hypercapnia.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , Hypercapnia/complications , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Respiratory Muscles , Diaphragm/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiologyABSTRACT
Rationale: Dyspnea is often a persistent symptom after acute coronavirus disease (COVID-19), even if cardiac and pulmonary function are normal. Objectives: This study investigated diaphragm muscle strength in patients after COVID-19 and its relationship to unexplained dyspnea on exertion. Methods: Fifty patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 (14 female, age 58 ± 12 yr, half of whom were treated with mechanical ventilation, and half of whom were treated outside the ICU) were evaluated using pulmonary function testing, 6-minute-walk test, echocardiography, twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure after cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve roots, and diaphragm ultrasound. Diaphragm function data were compared with values from a healthy control group. Measurements and Main Results: Moderate or severe dyspnea on exertion was present at 15 months after hospital discharge in approximately two-thirds of patients. No significant pulmonary function or echocardiography abnormalities were detected. Twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure was significantly impaired in patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with control subjects, independent of initial disease severity (14 ± 8 vs. 21 ± 3 cm H2O in mechanically ventilated patients vs. control subjects [P = 0.02], and 15 ± 8 vs. 21 ± 3 cm H2O in nonventilated patients vs. control subjects [P = 0.04]). There was a significant association between twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure and the severity of dyspnea on exertion (P = 0.03). Conclusions: Diaphragm muscle weakness was present 15 months after hospitalization for COVID-19 even in patients who did not require mechanical ventilation, and this weakness was associated with dyspnea on exertion. The current study, therefore, identifies diaphragm muscle weakness as a correlate for persistent dyspnea in patients after COVID-19 in whom lung and cardiac function are normal. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04854863).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Muscular Diseases , Thoracic Diseases , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , COVID-19/complications , Diaphragm , Dyspnea/etiology , Hospitalization , Muscle Weakness/diagnosisABSTRACT
Evidence from both animal and human studies now supports the development of ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) starting as early as 24 h after initiation of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, although the concept of VIDD is now widely accepted, there remain several unanswered questions regarding its pathophysiology, rate of development, and (potentially) recovery after mechanical ventilation.This state-of-the-art opinion article briefly explains VIDD and provides an update on its clinical and prognostic relevance. It then focusses on state-of-the-art diagnostic approaches to determine diaphragm function, strength, and control (neural and peripheral), highlights knowledge gaps relevant to VIDD, and discusses the use of diaphragm pacing for VIDD prevention. It is suggested that future research projects in mechanically ventilated patients would ideally use both cortical and cervical phrenic nerve stimulation studies over time (including also diaphragm electromyography) as the gold standard techniques. This approach has not yet been utilized in a longitudinally designed study in the ICU. Application of these gold standard techniques would allow better understanding of the true pathophysiology and rate of development of VIDD. Notably, these techniques would be superior to diaphragm ultrasound, which yields surrogate markers of diaphragm function only without any direct measure of diaphragm strength or control. It is also suggested that such translational research would further advance understanding of diaphragm pacing as a very promising treatment option for VIDD.
Subject(s)
Diaphragm , Ventilators, Mechanical , Animals , Humans , Diaphragm/diagnostic imaging , Ventilators, Mechanical/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Thorax , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
Background: Periodic breathing (PB) is a cyclical breathing pattern composed of alternating periods of hyperventilation (hyperpnea, HP) and central apnea (CA). Differences in PB phenotypes mainly reside in HP length. Given that respiration modulates muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), which decreases during HP and increases during CA, the net effects of PB on MSNA may critically depend on HP length. Objectives: We hypothesized that PB with shorter periods of HP is associated with increased MSNA and decreased heart rate variability. Methods: 10 healthy participants underwent microelectrode recordings of MSNA from the common peroneal nerve along with non-invasive recording of HRV, blood pressure and respiration. Following a 10-min period of tidal breathing, participants were asked to simulate PB for 3 min following a computed respiratory waveform that emulated two PB patterns, comprising a constant CA of 20 s duration and HP of two different lengths: short (20 s) vs long (40 s). Results: Compared to (3 min of) normal breathing, simulated PB with short HP resulted in a marked increase in mean and maximum MSNA amplitude (from 3.2 ± 0.8 to 3.4 ± 0.8 µV, p = 0.04; from 3.8 ± 0.9 to 4.3 ± 1.1 µV, p = 0.04, respectively). This was paralleled by an increase in LF/HF ratio of heart rate variability (from 0.9 ± 0.5 to 2.0 ± 1.3; p = 0.04). In contrast, MSNA response to simulated PB with long HP did not change as compared to normal breathing. Single CA events consistently resulted in markedly increased MSNA (all p < 0.01) when compared to the preceding HPs, while periods of HP, regardless of duration, decreased MSNA (p < 0.05) when compared to normal breathing. Conclusion: Overall, the net effects of PB in healthy subjects over time on MSNA are dependent on the relative duration of HP: increased sympathetic outflow is seen during PB with a short but not with a long period of HP.
ABSTRACT
This article explains the comprehensive state of the art assessment of sympathetic (SNA) and vagal nerve activity recordings in humans and highlights the precise mechanisms mediating increased SNA and its corresponding presumed clinical determinants and therapeutic potential in the context of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is known that patients with COPD exhibit increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), as measured directly using intraneural microelectrodes-the gold standard for evaluation of sympathetic outflow. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms responsible for the sympathoexcitation in COPD and its clinical relevance are less well understood. This may be related to the absence of a systematic approach to measure the increase in sympathetic activity and the lack of a comprehensive approach to assess the underlying mechanisms by which MSNA increases. The nature of sympathoexcitation can be dissected by distinguishing the heart rate increasing properties (heart rate and blood pressure variability) from the vasoconstrictive drive to the peripheral vasculature (measurement of catecholamines and MSNA) (Graphical Abstract Figure 1). Invasive assessment of MSNA to the point of single unit recordings with analysis of single postganglionic sympathetic firing, and hence SNA drive to the peripheral vasculature, is the gold standard for quantification of SNA in humans but is only available in a few centres worldwide because it is costly, time consuming and requires a high level of training. A broad picture of the underlying pathophysiological determinants of the increase in sympathetic outflow in COPD can only be determined if a combination of these tools are used. Various factors potentially determine SNA in COPD (Graphical Abstract Figure 1): Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent in COPD, and leads to repeated bouts of upper airway obstructions with hypoxemia, causing repetitive arousals. This probably produces ongoing sympathoexcitation in the awake state, likely in the "blue bloater" phenotype, resulting in persistent vasoconstriction. Other variables likely describe a subset of COPD patients with increase of sympathetic drive to the heart, clinically likely in the "pink puffer" phenotype. Pharmacological treatment options of increased SNA in COPD could comprise beta blocker therapy. However, as opposed to systolic heart failure a similar beneficial effect of beta blocker therapy in COPD patients has not been shown. The point is made that although MSNA is undoubtedly increased in COPD (probably independently from concomitant cardiovascular disease), studies designed to determine clinical improvements during specific treatment will only be successful if they include adequate patient selection and translational state of the art assessment of SNA. This would ideally include intraneural recordings of MSNA and-as a future perspective-vagal nerve activity all of which should ideally be assessed both in the upright and in the supine position to also determine baroreflex function.
ABSTRACT
Some COVID-19 patients experience dyspnea without objective impairment of pulmonary or cardiac function. This study determined diaphragm function and its central voluntary activation as a potential correlate with exertional dyspnea after COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in ten patients and matched controls. One year post discharge, both pulmonary function tests and echocardiography were normal. However, six patients with persisting dyspnea on exertion showed impaired volitional diaphragm function and control based on ultrasound, magnetic stimulation and balloon catheter-based recordings. Diaphragm dysfunction with impaired voluntary activation can be present 1 year after severe COVID-19 ARDS and may relate to exertional dyspnea.This prospective case-control study was registered under the trial registration number NCT04854863 April, 22 2021.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Aftercare , COVID-19/complications , Case-Control Studies , Diaphragm/diagnostic imaging , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Dyspnea/etiology , Humans , Patient Discharge , Physical Exertion , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital , Humans , Lung , Molecular Weight , Muscles , Respiratory MusclesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The clinical relevance and interrelation of sleep-disordered breathing and nocturnal hypoxemia in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is not fully understood. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with PH (age 63 ± 15 years, 41% male) and 35 matched controls were enrolled. Patients with PH underwent clinical examination with assessment of sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), overnight cardiorespiratory polygraphy, lung function, hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR; by rebreathing technique), amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and cardiac MRI (n = 34). RESULTS: Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was 68% in patients with PH (34% mild, apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥5 to <15/h; 34% moderate to severe, AHI ≥15/h) versus 5% in controls (p < 0.01). Only 1 patient with PH showed predominant central sleep apnea (CSA). Nocturnal hypoxemia (mean oxygen saturation [SpO2] <90%) was present in 48% of patients with PH, independent of the presence of OSA. There were no significant differences in mean nocturnal SpO2, self-reported sleep quality, 6MWD, HCVR, and lung and cardiac function between patients with moderate to severe OSA and those with mild or no OSA (all p > 0.05). Right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic (r = -0.39; p = 0.03) and end-systolic (r = -0.36; p = 0.04) volumes were inversely correlated with mean nocturnal SpO2 but not with measures of OSA severity or daytime clinical variables. CONCLUSION: OSA, but not CSA, is highly prevalent in patients with PH, and OSA severity is not associated with nighttime SpO2, clinical and functional status. Nocturnal hypoxemia is a frequent finding and (in contrast to OSA) relates to structural RV remodeling in PH.