Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 70(1): 102-10, 2008 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17869446

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare, in a randomized trial, 5-fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) (FU+LV) vs. oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus LV (UFT+LV) given concomitantly with preoperative irradiation in patients with cT3-4 or N+ rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 155 patients were entered onto the trial. Patients received pelvic radiotherapy (4500-5,040 cGy in 5 to 6 weeks) and chemotherapy consisting of two 5-day courses of 20 mg/m(2)/d LV and 350 mg/m(2)/d FU in the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy (77 patients) or one course of 25 mg/d oral LV and 300 mg/m(2)/d UFT for 4 weeks beginning in the second week of radiotherapy (78 patients). The primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) and resectability rate. Secondary endpoints included downstaging rate, toxicity, and survival. RESULTS: Grade 3-5 acute hematologic toxicity occurred only with FU+LV (leukopenia 9%; p = 0.02). There were no differences in resectability rates (92.1% vs. 93.4%; p = 0.82). The pCR rate was 13.2% in both arms. Tumor downstaging was more frequent with UFT+LV (59.2% vs. 43.3%; p = 0.04). Three-year overall survival was 87% with FU+LV and 74% with UFT+LV (p = 0.37). The 3-year cumulative incidences of local recurrence were 7.5% and 8.9%, respectively (p = 0.619; relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval 0.32-6.55). CONCLUSION: Although this study lacked statistical power to exclude clinically significant differences between both groups, the outcome of patients treated with UFT+LV did not differ significantly from that of patients treated with FU+LV, and hematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the experimental arm.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy Dosage , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Analysis , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Uracil/administration & dosage , Vitamin B Complex/administration & dosage
2.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 45(6): 1133-9, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15359992

ABSTRACT

Hodgkin's disease (HD) is a curable tumoral disease. However, there are groups of patients who suffer relapse and the identification of prognostic factors and the adaptation of treatments to individual risk is one the lines of investigation in this disease. A study was performed on 526 patients diagnosed of HD in our hospital between January 1967 and September 2001. An analysis was made of the most important variables in terms of both disease-free and overall survival. Overall survival in this series of patients was 94% at 2 years, 86% at 5 years, 76% at 10 years and 72% at 15 years. Median survival was 249 months. Factors influencing poor prognosis in the overall survival were: male gender (P < 0.0001), lymphocyte depletion (P < 0.0001), stages III and IV (P < 0.0001), B symptoms (P < 0.0001), spleen involvement at diagnosis (P = 0.003), no complete remission after first line treatment (P < 0.0001), and more than 30 years-of-age (P < 0.0001). Disease free survival was 83% at 2 years and 68% at 5 years although without reaching the mean follow-up. The disease free survival study revealed the following risk factors: male gender (P = 0.02), lymphocyte depletion (P < 0.0001), stages III and IV (P < 0.001), B symptoms (P < 0.001), extranodal or splenic involvement (P < 0.05), and no complete remission after first line treatment (P < 0.0001). The result of treatment optimization is that some factors that were considered to indicate a poor prognosis have disappeared, and that others which are useful have appeared and allow us to establish groups with differing risks of relapse and who could be candidates for differentiated treatments.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease/diagnosis , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...