Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10533, 2020 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33094073

ABSTRACT

Background Short-term medical missions (STMMs) are a highly debated and largely understudied form of international volunteer work. With growing dedication to health care abroad, research evaluating their impact is crucial to ensure continued interventions are effective in improving medical care. STMM care varies in length, frequency, size, location, services offered, and country of origin and destination. This makes systematic evaluation of STMMs difficult. In addition, the transient nature of patient visits makes trending STMM's impact on long-term health outcomes complex. Despite intermittent availability, primary care missions offering pharmaceutical supplies have the unique opportunity to provide continued care to the community via free prescription supplies each visit. Given the challenges with measuring long-term outcomes in this population, it is unknown if these donated medications have any impact on patient health outcomes. As medication noncompliance is known to hinder health outcomes, our study chose to evaluate patient medication habits to see if these prescription supplies were being utilized appropriately. To our knowledge, no study has surveyed medical mission patients to explore their access and utilization of medication. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using a patient survey to identify risks and/or factors associated with medication noncompliance in patients visiting the medical mission, Waves of Health (WOH). For over 10 years, WOH has organized biannual seven-day trips to the Dominican Republic. The multi-question survey was translated into the native language, Spanish with Dominican dialect. Noncompliance was defined through the survey question "Did you run out of your prescription medication at all during the past year?" Spanish speaking participants, of both sexes and age ≥18 years old, who visited the mission clinic in November 2019 met inclusion for this study. Patients from Haiti or age <18 years old were excluded. Participation was voluntary. Survey items were dichotomized for univariate analysis to identify factors associated with running out of medication. To explore predictors of running out of medicine, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis by ENTER method.  Results Of 127 patients, over half (58.3% [74]) reported running out of medication. Inadequate access to healthcare, daily medication use, and rationing personal medications were all significantly associated with running out of medicine. Frequency of WOH visits was not associated with running out of medication. Multivariate regression showed that being on daily medication and rationing personal medications were statistically significant predictors of running out of medicines. Access to healthcare, frequency of WOH visits, and WOH medication supply were not predictors of running out of medication. Conclusion  Mission interventions to improve medication practices should be explored due to the high number of patients who reported improper utilization of medication. In order to improve health outcomes in primary care settings, patients must play an active role in their care and understand the importance of taking their medication as prescribed for optimal disease management. Primary care STMMs may relieve short-term health concerns, but without proper utilization of chronic disease medications, it is unclear if STMMs role is impactful in long-term health outcomes.

2.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 142(5): 449-459, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a rare but debilitating neurological disease where the body develops antibodies against neuronal cell surface/synaptic proteins. Rituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody which shows promise in AE treatment observational studies. To our knowledge, there has been no previous meta-analysis providing robust evidence on the effectiveness and safety of rituximab as second-line therapy for the treatment for AE. METHODS: This study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis) statement. Investigators independently searched PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, WANFANG, CNKI, and J-STAGE for studies. Meta-analysis via representative forest plots was conducted for good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2), proportion of relapse, and mRS score change pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS: Good functional outcome at last follow-up following rituximab therapy occurred in 72.2% of patients (95% CI: 66.3%-77.4%). Mean mRS score decreased by 2.67 (95% CI: 2.04-3.3; P < .001). Relapses following the rituximab therapy occurred in only 14.2% of patients (95% CI: 9.5%-20.8%). Infusion related reactions, pneumonia, and severe sepsis were seen in 29 (15.7%), 11 (6.0%), and two patients (1.1%), respectively. The efficacy and side effect profile of rituximab are comparable to outcomes seen in rituximab use in other autoimmune and inflammatory CNS disease. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis showed that rituximab is an effective second-line agent for AE with an acceptable toxicity profile.


Subject(s)
Encephalitis/drug therapy , Hashimoto Disease/drug therapy , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...