A national survey of approaches to manage the ICU patient with opioid use disorder.

PURPOSE: Opioid associated admissions to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are increasing, but how institutions manage the care of these patients is unknown. We studied the availability of protocols and guidelines in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) for the management of the critically ill patient with opioid use disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent to a random sampling of ICU clinicians at acute care hospitals in the United States. RESULTS: Of the 300 hospitals contacted, 118 agreed to participate and 58 submitted surveys (49%, 58/118 response rate). While a majority of ICUs has a guideline to titrate sedative analgesics, only 7% reported a guideline that addresses the sedation needs of patients with opioid use disorder. Only one respondent identified a guideline for the continuation of medication-assisted treatment such as methadone. Most respondents did not have, or were unaware of, a guideline to manage opioid withdrawal or to prevent over-reversal with naloxone. Outpatient resources were offered to patients by 36% of institutions, while even fewer reported the use of a dedicated addiction care team. CONCLUSIONS: Few institutional guidelines exist to provide clinicians with the tools necessary to prevent harm and promote recovery for this growing and vulnerable ICU population.

Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication.

RATIONALE: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often require the care of specialist physicians for clinical or procedural expertise. The current state of communication between specialist physicians and families and nurses has not been explored. OBJECTIVES: To document the receipt of communication by nurses and family members regarding consultations performed on their patient or loved one, and to quantify how this impacts their overall perceptions of the quality of specialty care. METHODS: Prospective survey of 60 adult family members and 90 nurses of 189 ICU patients who received a specialist consultation between March and October of 2015 in a single academic medical center in the United States. Surveys measured the prevalence of direct communication-defined as communication conducted in person, via telephone, or via text-page in which the specialist team gathered information about the patient from the nurse/family member and/or shared recommendations for care-and perceived quality of care. RESULTS: In about two-thirds of family surveys (40/60) and one-half of nurse surveys (75/160), respondents had no direct communication with the specialist team that performed the consultation. Compared to nurses who had no direct communication with the specialists, those who did were 1.5 times more likely to rate the consultation as "excellent" (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.2-1.8, p<0.001). Nearly 40% (22/60) of families knew so little about the consultation that they felt incapable of evaluating it. CONCLUSIONS: Most ICU families and nurses have no interaction with specialist providers. Nurses' frequent exclusion from conversations about specialty care may pose safety risks and increase the likelihood of mixed messages for patients and families, most of whom desire some interaction with specialists. Future research is needed to identify effective mechanisms for information sharing that keep nurses and families aware of consultation requests, delivery, and outcomes without increasing the risk of mixed messages.