Long-Term Blockade of Nociceptive Nav1.7 Channels Is Analgesic in Rat Models of Knee Arthritis.

The voltage gated sodium channels (Nav) 1.7, 1.8, and 1.9 are primarily located on nociceptors where they are involved in signalling neuropathic pain. This study examined the effect of Nav1.7 blockade on joint pain using either the small molecule inhibitor PF05089771 or an antibody directed towards the intracellular domain of the ion channel. Male Wistar rats were assigned to one of three experimental groups consisting of either intra-articular injection of 3 mg sodium monoiodoacetate (MIA-joint degeneration group), intra-articular injection of 100 µg lysophosphatidic acid (LPA-joint neuropathy group), or transection of the medial meniscus (MMT-posttraumatic osteoarthritis group). G-ratio calculations were performed to determine potential demyelination and immunohistochemistry was used to measure Nav1.7 expression on joint afferent cell bodies. Pain behaviour was evaluated over 3 h by von Frey hair algesiometry and hindlimb weight bearing before and after local administration of PF05089771 (0.1 mg/50 µL). Chronic pain behaviour was assessed over 28 days following peripheral treatment with a Nav1.7 antibody (Ab) in conjunction with the transmembrane carrier peptide Pep1. Demyelination and increased Nav1.7 channel expression were observed in MIA and LPA rats, but not with MMT. Acute secondary allodynia was diminished by PF05089771 while a single injection of Nav1.7 Ab-Pep1 reduced pain up to 28 days. This analgesia only occurred in MIA and LPA animals. Hindlimb incapacitance was not affected by any treatment. These data indicate that joint pain associated with neural demyelination can be alleviated somewhat by Nav1.7 channel blockade. Biologics that inactivate Nav1.7 channels have the potential to reduce arthritis pain over a protracted period of time.

Joint Damage and Neuropathic Pain in Rats Treated With Lysophosphatidic Acid.

Joint pain is a complex phenomenon that involves multiple endogenous mediators and pathophysiological events. In addition to nociceptive and inflammatory pain, some patients report neuropathic-like pain symptoms. Examination of arthritic joints from humans and preclinical animal models have revealed axonal damage which is likely the source of the neuropathic pain. The mediators responsible for joint peripheral neuropathy are obscure, but lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) has emerged as a leading candidate target. In the present study, male and female Wistar rats received an intra-articular injection of LPA into the right knee and allowed to recover for 28 days. Joint pain was measured by von Frey hair algesiometry, while joint pathology was determined by scoring of histological sections. Both male and female rats showed comparable degenerative changes to the LPA-treated knee including chondrocyte death, focal bone erosion, and synovitis. Mechanical withdrawal thresholds decreased by 20-30% indicative of secondary allodynia in the affected limb; however, there was no significant difference in pain sensitivity between the sexes. Treatment of LPA animals with the neuropathic pain drug amitriptyline reduced joint pain for over 2 hours with no sex differences being observed. In summary, intra-articular injection of LPA causes joint degeneration and neuropathic pain thereby mimicking some of the characteristics of neuropathic osteoarthritis.

Intracellular versus extracellular inhibition of calpain I causes differential effects on pain in a rat model of joint inflammation.

Calpain I is a calcium-dependent cysteine protease which has dual effects on tissue inflammation depending on its cellular location. Intracellularly, calpain I has pro-inflammatory properties but becomes anti-inflammatory when exteriorised into the extracellular space. In this study, the effect of calpain I on joint pain was investigated using the kaolin/carrageenan model of acute synovitis. Evoked pain behaviour was determined by von Frey hair algesiometry and non-evoked pain was measured using dynamic hindlimb weight bearing. Local administration of calpain I reduced secondary allodynia in the acute inflammation model and this effect was blocked by the cell impermeable calpain inhibitor E-64c. Calpain I also blocked the algesic effect of the protease activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) cleaving enzyme mast cell tryptase. The cell permeable calpain blocker E-64d also produced analgesia in arthritic joints. These data suggest that calpain I produces disparate effects on joint pain viz. analgesia when present extracellularly by disarming PAR-2, and pro-algesic when the enzyme is inside the cell.

Alpha-1-antitrypsin reduces inflammation and exerts chondroprotection in arthritis.

While new treatments have been developed to control joint disease in rheumatoid arthritis, they are partially effective and do not promote structural repair of cartilage. Following an initial identification of α-1-Antitrypsin (AAT) during the resolution phase of acute inflammation, we report here the properties of this protein in the context of cartilage protection, joint inflammation, and associated pain behavior. Intra-articular and systemic administration of AAT reversed joint inflammation, nociception, and cartilage degradation in the KBxN serum and neutrophil elastase models of arthritis. Ex vivo analyses of arthritic joints revealed that AAT promoted transcription of col2a1, acan, and sox9 and downregulated mmp13 and adamts5 gene expression. In vitro studies using human chondrocytes revealed that SERPINA1 transfection and rAAT protein promoted chondrogenic differentiation through activation of PKA-dependent CREB signaling and inhibition of Wnt/ß-catenin pathways. Thus, AAT is endowed with anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and chondroprotective properties that are partially inter-related. We propose that AAT could be developed for new therapeutic strategies to reduce arthritic pain and repair damaged cartilage.

Microglial pannexin-1 channel activation is a spinal determinant of joint pain.

Chronic joint pain such as mechanical allodynia is the most debilitating symptom of arthritis, yet effective therapies are lacking. We identify the pannexin-1 (Panx1) channel as a therapeutic target for alleviating mechanical allodynia, a cardinal sign of arthritis. In rats, joint pain caused by intra-articular injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) was associated with spinal adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) release and a microglia-specific up-regulation of P2X7 receptors (P2X7Rs). Blockade of P2X7R or ablation of spinal microglia prevented and reversed mechanical allodynia. P2X7Rs drive Panx1 channel activation, and in rats with mechanical allodynia, Panx1 function was increased in spinal microglia. Specifically, microglial Panx1-mediated release of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) induced mechanical allodynia in the MIA-injected hindlimb. Intrathecal administration of the Panx1-blocking peptide 10panx suppressed the aberrant discharge of spinal laminae I-II neurons evoked by innocuous mechanical hindpaw stimulation in arthritic rats. Furthermore, mice with a microglia-specific genetic deletion of Panx1 were protected from developing mechanical allodynia. Treatment with probenecid, a clinically used broad-spectrum Panx1 blocker, resulted in a striking attenuation of MIA-induced mechanical allodynia and normalized responses in the dynamic weight-bearing test, without affecting acute nociception. Probenecid reversal of mechanical allodynia was also observed in rats 13 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament transection, a model of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Thus, Panx1-targeted therapy is a new mechanistic approach for alleviating joint pain.

Prophylactic inhibition of neutrophil elastase prevents the development of chronic neuropathic pain in osteoarthritic mice.

BACKGROUND: A subset of osteoarthritis (OA) patients experience joint pain with neuropathic characteristics. Mediators such as neutrophil elastase, a serine proteinase, may be released during acute OA inflammatory flares. We have previously shown that local administration of neutrophil elastase causes joint inflammation and pain via activation of proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2). The aim of this study was to examine the contribution of endogenous neutrophil elastase and PAR2 to the development of joint inflammation, pain, and neuropathy associated with monoiodoacetate (MIA)-induced experimental OA. METHODS: MIA (0.3 mg/10 µl) was injected into the right knee joint of male C57BL/6 mice (20-34 g). Joint inflammation (edema, leukocyte kinetics), neutrophil elastase proteolytic activity, tactile allodynia, and saphenous nerve demyelination were assessed over 14 days post-injection. The effects of inhibiting neutrophil elastase during the early inflammatory phase of MIA (days 0 to 3) were determined using sivelestat (50 mg/kg i.p.) and serpinA1 (10 µg i.p.). Involvement of PAR2 in the development of MIA-induced joint inflammation and pain was studied using the PAR2 antagonist GB83 (5 µg i.p. days 0 to 1) and PAR2 knockout animals. RESULTS: MIA caused an increase in neutrophil elastase proteolytic activity on day 1 (P < 0.0001), but not on day 14. MIA also generated a transient inflammatory response which peaked on day 1 (P < 0.01) then subsided over the 2-week time course. Joint pain appeared on day 1 and persisted to day 14 (P < 0.0001). By day 14, the saphenous nerve showed signs of demyelination. Early treatment with sivelestat and serpinA1 blocked the proteolytic activity of neutrophil elastase on day 1 (P < 0.001), and caused lasting improvements in joint inflammation, pain, and saphenous nerve damage (P < 0.05). MIA-induced synovitis was reversed by early treatment with GB83 and attenuated in PAR2 knockout mice (P < 0.05). PAR2 knockout mice also showed reduced MIA-induced joint pain (P < 0.0001) and less nerve demyelination (P = 0.81 compared to saline control). CONCLUSIONS: Neutrophil elastase and PAR2 contribute significantly to the development of joint inflammation, pain, and peripheral neuropathy associated with experimental OA, suggesting their potential as therapeutic targets.

Neutrophil elastase induces inflammation and pain in mouse knee joints via activation of proteinase-activated receptor-2.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neutrophil elastase plays a crucial role in arthritis. Here, its potential in triggering joint inflammation and pain was assessed, and whether these effects were mediated by proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Neutrophil elastase (5 µg) was injected into the knee joints of mice and changes in blood perfusion, leukocyte kinetics and paw withdrawal threshold were assessed. Similar experiments were performed in animals pretreated with the neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat, the PAR2 antagonist GB83, the p44/42 MAPK inhibitor U0126 and in PAR2 receptor knockout (KO) mice. Neutrophil elastase activity was also evaluated in arthritic joints by fluorescent imaging and sivelestat was assessed for anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. KEY RESULTS: Intra-articular injection of neutrophil elastase caused an increase in blood perfusion, leukocyte kinetics and a decrease in paw withdrawal threshold. Sivelestat treatment suppressed this effect. The PAR2 antagonist GB83 reversed neutrophil elastase-induced synovitis and pain and these responses were also attenuated in PAR2 KO mice. The MAPK inhibitor U0126 also blocked neutrophil elastase-induced inflammation and pain. Active neutrophil elastase was increased in acutely inflamed knees as shown by an activatable fluorescent probe. Sivelestat appeared to reduce neutrophil elastase activity, but had only a moderate anti-inflammatory effect in this model. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Neutrophil elastase induced acute inflammation and pain in knee joints of mice. These changes are PAR2-dependent and appear to involve activation of a p44/42 MAPK pathway. Blocking neutrophil elastase, PAR2 and p44/42 MAPK activity can reduce inflammation and pain, suggesting their utility as therapeutic targets.

Spinal and peripheral adenosine A1 receptors contribute to antinociception by tramadol in the formalin test in mice.

Tramadol, an analgesic used alone or combined with acetaminophen, has a complex mechanism of action involving opioid and amine mechanisms. In this study, we explored the involvement of spinal and peripheral adenosine A1 receptors in antinociception by tramadol, and determined whether spinal serotonin 5-HT7 receptors were linked to spinal A1 receptor actions. Antinociception was examined using the 2% formalin test in mice. Tramadol was administered systemically (intraperitoneal) or peripherally (intraplantar). Caffeine (non-selective A1/A2A receptor antagonist) and SCH58261 (selective A2A receptor antagonist) were given systemically, while DPCPX (selective A1 receptor antagonist) was given systemically, spinally (lumbar puncture), or peripherally. Systemic tramadol 35 mg/kg produced antinociception against phase 2 formalin-evoked flinching behaviors, particularly in the earlier parts (phase 2A). Systemic caffeine (10 mg/kg) and DPCPX (1 mg/kg), but not SCH58261 (3 mg/kg), inhibited antinociception by systemic tramadol. Spinal DPCPX 3 µg also inhibited the action of systemic tramadol. Spinal SB269970 (selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist) 3-10 µg did not alter the effect of systemic tramadol. Intraplantar tramadol produced antinociception against flinching behaviors, and this action was reversed by intraplantar DPCPX 4.5 µg administered on the ipsilateral, but not contralateral, side. Intraplantar DPCPX also reversed antinociception by systemic tramadol. These results indicate that adenosine A1 receptors contribute to antinociception by tramadol in the mouse formalin model, and that spinal and peripheral sites are involved in these actions. 5HT7 receptors in the spinal cord do not appear to be involved in the recruitment of A1 receptor mechanisms when tramadol is given systemically in this model.

Antinociception by systemically-administered acetaminophen (paracetamol) involves spinal serotonin 5-HT7 and adenosine A1 receptors, as well as peripheral adenosine A1 receptors.

Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is a widely used analgesic, but its sites and mechanisms of action remain incompletely understood. Recent studies have separately implicated spinal adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)Rs) and serotonin 5-HT(7) receptors (5-HT(7)Rs) in the antinociceptive effects of systemically administered acetaminophen. In the present study, we determined whether these two actions are linked by delivering a selective 5-HT(7)R antagonist to the spinal cord of mice and examining nociception using the formalin 2% model. In normal and A(1)R wild type mice, antinociception by systemic (i.p.) acetaminophen 300mg/kg was reduced by intrathecal (i.t.) delivery of the selective 5-HT(7)R antagonist SB269970 3µg. In mice lacking A(1)Rs, i.t. SB269970 did not reverse antinociception by systemic acetaminophen, indicating a link between spinal 5-HT(7)R and A(1)R mechanisms. We also explored potential roles of peripheral A(1)Rs in antinociception by acetaminophen administered both locally and systemically. In normal mice, intraplantar (i.pl.) acetaminophen 200µg produced antinociception in the formalin test, and this was blocked by co-administration of the selective A(1)R antagonist DPCPX 4.5µg. Acetaminophen administered into the contralateral hindpaw had no effect, indicating a local peripheral action. When acetaminophen was administered systemically, its antinociceptive effect was reversed by i.pl. DPCPX in normal mice; this was also observed in A(1)R wild type mice, but not in those lacking A(1)Rs. In summary, we demonstrate a link between spinal 5-HT(7)Rs and A(1)Rs in the spinal cord relevant to antinociception by systemic acetaminophen. Furthermore, we implicate peripheral A(1)Rs in the antinociceptive effects of locally- and systemically-administered acetaminophen.

Spinal serotonin 5-HT7 and adenosine A1 receptors, as well as peripheral adenosine A1 receptors, are involved in antinociception by systemically administered amitriptyline.

The present study explored a link between spinal 5-HT(7) and adenosine A(1) receptors in antinociception by systemic amitriptyline in normal and adenosine A(1) receptor knock-out mice using the 2% formalin test. In normal mice, antinociception by systemic amitriptyline 3mg/kg was blocked by intrathecal administration of the selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) 10 nmol. Blockade was also seen in adenosine A(1) receptor +/+ mice, but not in -/- mice lacking these receptors. In both normal and adenosine A(1) receptor +/+ mice, the selective 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist (2R)-1-[(3-hydroxyphenyl)sulfonyl]-2-[2-(4-methyl-1-piperidinyl)ethyl]pyrrolidine hydrochloride (SB269970) 3 µg blocked antinociception by systemic amitriptyline, but it did not prevent antinociception in adenosine A(1) receptor -/- mice. In normal mice, flinching was unaltered when the selective 5-HT(7) receptor agonist (2S)-(+)-5-(1,3,5-trimethylpyrazol-4-yl)-2-(dimethylamino)tetralin (AS-19) 20 µg was administered alone, but increased when co-administered intrathecally with DPCPX 10 nmol or SB269970 3 µg. Intrathecal AS-19 decreased flinching in adenosine A(1) receptor +/+ mice compared to -/- mice. Systemic amitriptyline appears to reduce nociception by activating spinal adenosine A(1) receptors secondarily to 5-HT(7) receptors. Spinal actions constitute only one aspect of antinociception by amitriptyline, as intraplantar DPCPX 10 nmol blocked antinociception by systemic amitriptyline in normal and adenosine A(1) receptor +/+, but not -/- mice. Adenosine A(1) receptor interactions are worthy of attention, as chronic oral caffeine (0.1, 0.3g/L, doses considered relevant to human intake levels) blocked antinociception by systemic amitriptyline in normal mice. In conclusion, adenosine A(1) receptors contribute to antinociception by systemic amitriptyline in both spinal and peripheral compartments.

Caffeine inhibits antinociception by acetaminophen in the formalin test by inhibiting spinal adenosine A1 receptors.

The present study examined effects of caffeine on antinociception by acetaminophen in the formalin test in mice. It demonstrates that caffeine 10mg/kg inhibits antinociception produced by acetaminophen 300 mg/kg i.p. against phase 2 flinches. Chronic administration of caffeine in the drinking water (0.1, 0.3g/l) for 8 days also inhibits the action of acetaminophen. The selective adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist DPCPX 1mg/kg i.p. mimics the action of caffeine, but the selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist SCH58261 3mg/kg i.p. does not. While acetaminophen produced the same effect in mice that were +/+, +/- and -/- for adenosine A(1) receptors, inhibition of antinociception by caffeine was seen only in +/+ and +/- mice. A higher dose of caffeine, 40 mg/kg, produced an intrinsic antinociception against formalin-evoked flinches, an effect also seen when caffeine was administered intrathecally. SCH58261 30 nmol, but not DPCPX 10 nmol, also produced antinociception when administered intrathecally indicating involvement of adenosine A(2A) receptors in spinal antinociception. Caffeine reversal of acetaminophen results from actions in the spinal cord, as intrathecal DPCPX 10 nmol inhibited antinociception by systemic acetaminophen; this was also observed in +/+ but not in -/- adenosine A(1) receptor mice. We propose that spinal adenosine A(1) receptors contribute to the action of acetaminophen secondarily to involvement of descending serotonin pathways and release of adenosine within the spinal cord. Inhibition of acetaminophen antinociception by doses of caffeine relevant to dietary human intake levels suggests a more detailed consideration of acetaminophen-caffeine interactions in humans is warranted.

Reduction of formalin-evoked responses and maintenance of peripheral antinociception by morphine against formalin in the spared nerve injury model.

This study examined (a) the effect of formalin administration into two different sensory fields, the lateral and medial hindpaw, in the spared nerve injury (SNI) model in rats and (b) peripheral antinociception by morphine when co-administered with formalin at lateral and medial hindpaw sites. Following SNI and injections into the lateral hindpaw, the site most commonly used to evaluate sensory changes using this model, flinching responses to formalin (0.5%, 1%) were unchanged. In contrast, following medial plantar hindpaw injections, flinching responses to formalin (1%, 2.5%) were significantly reduced. When morphine was co-administered with formalin, it exhibited similar peripheral antinociception at both lateral and medial sites, and following sham or SNI surgery. These results indicate that the effects of SNI on chemogenic signaling by formalin, which is now known to involve TRPA1 receptors, differ from effects on allodynia responses. Furthermore, the maintenance of peripheral actions of morphine at both sites supports the notion of exploring peripheral delivery of opioids for pain relief following nerve injury.

Caffeine reverses antinociception by oxcarbazepine by inhibition of adenosine A1 receptors: insights using knockout mice.

Oxcarbazepine is an anticonvulsant drug that has been explored as a novel therapeutic agent to treat neuropathic pain in humans. It produces antinociception in several preclinical models of pain, and these actions are blocked by methylxanthine adenosine receptor antagonists which implicates adenosine it its actions. In this study, the antinociceptive effect of oxcarbazepine, and the ability of caffeine to reverse its actions, were examined using the formalin test (2%) in wild-type mice and in mice lacking adenosine A(1) receptors by way of further exploring the involvement of adenosine in its actions. Oxcarbazepine produced dose-related suppression of formalin-evoked flinching responses in wild-type mice following both systemic and intraplantar administration, and this action was reversed by systemic and intraplantar administration of caffeine, respectively. The ability of oxcarbazepine to inhibit flinching after systemic and intraplantar administration was unaltered in homozygous (-/-) and heterozygous (+/-) adenosine A(1) receptor knockout mice. However, caffeine no longer reversed this antinociception. Our results indicate that, while adenosine A(1) receptors are not required for oxcarbazepine to produce antinociception in knockout mice, such receptors are essential in order to see caffeine reversal of this antinociceptive effect.

Adrenergic regulation of P2X3 and TRPV1 receptors: differential effects of spared nerve injury.

Local application of alphabetaMeATP (ligand for P2X3 receptors) and capsaicin (ligand for TRPV1 receptors) to the rat hindpaw produces pain behaviors (flinching) which are enhanced by noradrenaline (NA). In this study, we have examined the effect of nerve injury on adrenergic regulation of P2X3 and TRPV1 receptors by administering alphabetaMeATP and capsaicin, alone and in combination with NA, into the lateral and medial hindpaw in the spared nerve injury (SNI) model; this allows for an exploration of the role of injured and uninjured afferents in their effects on nociceptive signaling using a behavioral model. Following lateral hindpaw injections (sural sensory field), effects of NA and alphabetaMeATP, both alone and in combination, were increased following SNI, but no such effects were seen following medial hindpaw injections (saphenous sensory field). Following lateral hindpaw injections, the effect of capsaicin alone was unaltered following SNI, but the effect of NA/capsaicin was reduced; this latter effect was not seen following medial hindpaw injections. At the lateral site, prazosin (alpha1-adrenergic receptor antagonist) inhibited the effect of NA/alphabetaMeATP following SNI, but neither prazosin nor GF109203X (protein kinase C inhibitor) inhibited the effect of NA/capsaicin following SNI. These results demonstrate: (a) an enhanced adrenergic regulation of P2X3 receptor activity at lateral sites following SNI where signaling afferents are directly influenced by injured neurons; (b) differential effects on adrenergic regulation of TRPV1 receptors under the same conditions; (c) lack of such changes when agents are administered into medial sites following SNI.

Caffeine reverses antinociception by amitriptyline in wild type mice but not in those lacking adenosine A1 receptors.

Amitriptyline is used to treat neuropathic pain in humans. It produces antinociception in several animal models of pain, and this effect is blocked by methylxanthine adenosine receptor antagonists which implicates adenosine it its actions. Here, the antinociceptive effect of amitriptyline, and the ability of caffeine to reverse it, were examined using the formalin test (a model of persistent pain) in wild type mice and mice lacking the adenosine A(1) receptor (A1R). Amitriptyline produced dose-related suppression of flinching in wild type mice following both systemic and intraplantar drug administration; both of these effects were unaltered in A1R -/- mice. Following systemic administration, caffeine reversed the systemic effect of amitriptyline in wild type, but not A1R -/- mice; -/+ mice exhibited an intermediate effect. Intraplantar administration of caffeine also reversed the effect of intraplantar amitriptyline in A1R +/+, but not in -/- or +/- mice. These results indicate that adenosine A(1) receptors are not required in order for amitriptyline to cause antinociception in mice, but they are required to see caffeine reversal of this antinociceptive effect. When A1Rs are present, actions of amitriptyline may, however, partly depend on A1Rs.

Amitriptyline enhances extracellular tissue levels of adenosine in the rat hindpaw and inhibits adenosine uptake.

Local administration of amitriptyline into the rat hindpaw produces peripheral antinociception; this is reduced by adenosine receptor antagonists and appears to involve endogenous adenosine. The present study used peripheral microdialysis: (a) to determine whether amitriptyline could enhance extracellular tissue levels of endogenous adenosine in the rat hindpaw and (b) to examine mechanisms by which such an increase could occur. Local injection of amitriptyline into the plantar hindpaw, at doses that produce peripheral antinociception (100-300 nmol), produced an increase in local extracellular levels of adenosine. When injected in combination with formalin, which also enhances such levels of adenosine, an additive increase was observed. This adenosine originated partly as nucleotide, as inhibition of ecto-5'-nucleotidase reduced the amount of adenosine detected in the probe following administration of amitriptyline. When administered in combination with exogenous adenosine, amitriptyline augmented recovery of adenosine in the probe. Pretreatment of rats with capsaicin augmented the ability of amitriptyline to increase adenosine levels detected in the dialysis probe; it also enhanced tissue recovery of exogenously administered adenosine. In uptake studies using cultured rat C6 glioma cells, amitriptyline inhibited adenosine uptake by an adenosine transporter (IC50 0.37 +/- 0.12 mM). In enzyme assays, amitriptyline had no effect on adenosine kinase or adenosine deaminase activity. These results demonstrate that amitriptyline: (a) enhances extracellular tissue levels of adenosine in the rat hindpaw following local administration in vivo and (b) inhibits adenosine uptake but has no effect on metabolism in vitro. Therefore, increased extracellular adenosine levels in vivo appear to result partially from extracellular conversion of nucleotide and partially from inhibition of uptake.

Amitriptyline produces multiple influences on the peripheral enhancement of nociception by P2X receptors.

Peripherally administered amitriptyline exhibits potential to be a locally active analgesic, while ATP augments peripheral nociception by interacting with P2X(3) receptors on sensory afferents. The present study examined the effects of amitriptyline on flinching and biting/licking behaviours and thermal hyperalgesia produced by alphabeta-methylene-ATP (alphabeta-MeATP), a ligand for P2X(3) receptors, following intraplantar administration into the hindpaw of rats. Coadministration of low doses of amitriptyline (up to 100 nmol) with alphabeta-MeATP augmented thermal hyperalgesia and flinching behaviours. The most active dose of amitriptyline (100 nmol) had no intrinsic effect. Augmentation of alphabeta-MeATP actions appears to be due to increased tissue levels of biogenic amines resulting from inhibition of uptake, as phentolamine (alpha(1)/alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist) and methysergide (5-hydroxytryptamine or 5-HT(1)/5-HT(2) receptor antagonist) inhibit the augmented flinching produced by alphabeta-MeATP/amitriptyline. When noradrenaline and 5-HT were coadministered with alphabeta-MeATP (both increase the effect of alphabeta-MeATP), amitriptyline had no effect on flinching produced by alphabeta-MeATP/noradrenaline but inhibited flinching produced by alphabeta-MeATP/5-HT. In the presence of low concentrations of formalin (0.5%, 1%; which also increase the effect alphabeta-MeATP), amitriptyline inhibited augmented behaviours. Higher doses of amitriptyline (300-1000 nmol) increased thermal thresholds, suppressed thermal hyperalgesia produced by alphabeta-MeATP, and inhibited flinching produced by alphabeta-MeATP. Collectively, these results indicate that amitriptyline produces complex influences on peripheral pain signaling by P2X receptors. Lower doses augment nociception by alphabeta-MeATP (probably by inhibiting noradrenaline and 5-HT uptake) but inhibit alphabeta-MeATP responses in the presence of inflammatory mediators (perhaps reflecting receptor blocking properties); higher doses uniformly inhibit nociception by alphabeta-MeATP (perhaps reflecting local anesthetic properties).

Caffeine antinociception in the rat hot-plate and formalin tests and locomotor stimulation: involvement of noradrenergic mechanisms.

The present study examined antinociception produced by systemic administration of caffeine in the rat hot-plate (HP) and formalin tests and addressed several aspects of the mechanism of action of caffeine. Locomotor activity was monitored throughout. Caffeine produced a dose-related antinociception the HP (50-100 mg/kg) and formalin tests (12.5-75 mg/kg). When observed during the formalin test, caffeine stimulated locomotor activity between 12.5 and 50 mg/kg; this was followed by a depression in activity at 75 mg/kg. Caffeine did not produce an anti-inflammatory effect as determined by hindpaw plethysmometry, suggesting that antinociception was not secondary to an anti-inflammatory action. Peripheral co-administration of caffeine with the formalin did not produce antinociception, suggesting a predominant central rather than peripheral site of action for caffeine. Naloxone (10 mg/kg) did not reduce the antinociceptive or locomotor stimulant effects of caffeine, suggesting a lack of involvement of endogenous opioids in these actions. Phentolamine (5 mg/kg) enhanced antinociception by caffeine in both the HP and formalin tests, but inhibited locomotor stimulation. Prazosin (0.15 mg/kg) mimicked the action of phentolamine on locomotor stimulation, but idazoxan (0.5 mg/kg) mimicked the action of phentolamine on antinociception in the formalin test. These observations suggest an involvement of different alpha-adrenergic receptors in the two actions of phentolamine. Microinjection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the locus coeruleus, which depleted noradrenaline (NA) in the spinal cord and forebrain, inhibited the action of caffeine in the HP test. This was mimicked by intrathecal 6-OHDA which depleted NA in the spinal cord, but not by microinjection of 6-OHDA into the dorsal bundle which depleted NA in the forebrain. These results suggest an integral involvement of noradrenergic mechanisms in the antinociceptive action of caffeine in the HP and formalin tests and in locomotor stimulation, but the nature of this involvement differs for the 3 end points.