Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMJ Mil Health ; 2023 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38053265

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Physiological monitoring of soldiers can indicate combat readiness and performance. Despite demonstrated use of wearable devices for HR monitoring, commercial options lack desired military features. A newly developed OMNI monitor includes desired features such as long-range secure data transmission. This study investigated the accuracy of the OMNI to measure HR via accuracy of R-R interval duration relative to research-grade ECG and commercial products. METHODS: 54 healthy individuals (male/female=37/17, age=22.2±3.6 years, height=173.0±9.1 cm, weight=70.1±11.2 kg) completed a submaximal exercise test while wearing a reference ECG (Biopac) and a randomly assigned chest-based monitor (OMNI, Polar H10, Equivital EQ-02, Zephyr Bioharness 3). All participants also wore two wrist-based photoplethysmography (PPG) devices, Garmin fenix 6 and Empatica E4. Bland-Altman analyses of agreement, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) were used to determine accuracy of the OMNI and commercial devices relative to Biopac. Additionally, a linear mixed-effects model evaluated the effects of device and exercise intensity on agreement. RESULTS: Chest-based devices showed superior agreement with Biopac for measuring R-R interval compared with wrist-based ones in terms of mean bias, CCC and RMSE, with OMNI demonstrating the best scores on all metrics. Linear mixed-effects model showed no significant main or interaction effects for the chest-based devices. However, significant effects were found for Garmin and Empatica devices (p<0.001) as well as the interaction effects between both Garmin and Empatica and exercise intensity (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Chest-based ECG devices are preferred to wrist-based PPG devices due to superior HR accuracy over a range of exercise intensities, with the OMNI device demonstrating equal, if not superior, performance to other commercial ECG monitors. Additionally, wrist-based PPG devices are significantly affected by exercise intensity as they underestimate HR at low intensities and overestimate HR at high intensities.

2.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 17(1): 91-5, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23299386

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether body mass index (BMI) at the time of hospitalization or weight change in the period immediately following hospitalization predict physical function in the year after hip fracture. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Two hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Female hip fracture patients age 65 years or older (N=136 for BMI analysis, N=41 for analysis of weight change). MEASUREMENTS: Body mass index was calculated based on weight and height from the medical chart. Weight change was based on DXA scans at 3 and 10 days post fracture. Physical function was assessed at 2, 6 and 12 months following fracture using the lower extremity gain scale (LEGS), walking speed and grip strength. RESULTS: LEGS score and walking speed did not differ across BMI tertiles. However, grip strength differed significantly across BMI tertiles (p=0.029), with underweight women having lower grip strength than normal weight women at all time points. Women experiencing the most weight loss (>4.8%) had significantly lower LEGS scores at all time points, slower walking speed at 6 months, and weaker grip strength at 12 months post-fracture relative to women with more modest weight loss. In adjusted models, overall differences in function and functional change across all time points were not significant. However, at 12 months post fracture,women with the most weight loss had an average grip strength 7.0 kg lower than women with modest weight loss (p=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment for confounders accounts for much of the relationships between BMI and function and weight change and function in the year after fracture. However, weight loss is associated with weakness during hip fracture recovery. Weight loss during and immediately after hospitalization appears to identify women at risk of poor function and may represent an important target for future interventions.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Hip Fractures/physiopathology , Weight Loss , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Baltimore , Female , Hand Strength/physiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Prospective Studies , Walking/physiology
3.
Osteoporos Int ; 21(5): 741-50, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19572093

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: This study examined femur geometry underlying previously observed decline in BMD of the contralateral hip in older women the year following hip fracture compared to non-fractured controls. Compared to controls, these women experienced a greater decline in indices of bone structural strength, potentially increasing the risk of a second fracture. INTRODUCTION: This study examined the femur geometry underlying previously observed decline in BMD of the contralateral hip in the year following hip fracture compared to non-fractured controls. METHODS: Geometry was derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan images using hip structural analysis from women in the third cohort of the Baltimore Hip Studies and from women in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Change in BMD, section modulus (SM), cross-sectional area (CSA), outer diameter, and buckling ratio (BR) at the narrow neck (NN), intertrochanteric (IT), and shaft (S) regions of the hip were compared. RESULTS: Wider bones and reduced CSA underlie the significantly lower BMD observed in women who fractured their hip resulting in more fragile bones expressed by a lower SM and higher BR. Compared to controls, these women experienced a significantly greater decline in CSA (-2.3% vs. -0.2%NN, -3.2% vs. -0.5%IT), SM (-2.1% vs. -0.2%NN, -3.9% vs. -0.6%IT), and BMD (-3.0% vs. -0.8%NN, -3.3% vs. -0.6%IT, -2.3% vs. -0.2%S) and a greater increase in BR (5.0% vs. 2.1%NN, 6.0% vs. 1.3%IT, 4.4% vs. 1.0%S) and shaft outer diameter (0.9% vs. 0.1%). CONCLUSION: The contralateral femur continued to weaken during the year following fracture, potentially increasing the risk of a second fracture.


Subject(s)
Femur/physiopathology , Hip Fractures/physiopathology , Osteoporotic Fractures/physiopathology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density/physiology , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Femur/pathology , Femur Neck/pathology , Femur Neck/physiopathology , Hip Fractures/pathology , Humans , Osteoporotic Fractures/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...