The relationship between substance use, prior trauma history, and risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder in the immediate aftermath of civilian trauma.

Many reports have documented the relationship between post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use. Substance use is commonly comorbid with PTSD and is a risk factor for trauma exposure. The aim of this study was to prospectively examine how recent substance use, abuse, or dependence influenced the development of PTSD in the context of a prior trauma history, including child abuse, and the severity of initial trauma reactions. Participants (N = 81) were recruited and assessed at the emergency department of a large urban hospital in Miami and serum levels of common drugs of abuse were measured. Although substance use appeared to be a risk factor for trauma exposure, neither self-reported nor blood toxicology influenced the development of PTSD. Positive toxicology screens were more likely to be associated with a diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence, χ2 (1) = 4.11, p = .04. Participants with a history of physical abuse were more likely to have a positive toxicology screen, χ2 (1) = 4.03, p = .05. The majority of our trauma-exposed subjects (66%) were found to be positive for one or more illicit substances at presentation at the ED. The current findings provide support for the "high risk" hypothesis in which substance use is associated with increased trauma exposure.

Forty-Three Fatalities Involving the Synthetic Cannabinoid, 5-Fluoro-ADB: Forensic Pathology and Toxicology Implications.

Forty-three fatalities involving the potent synthetic cannabinoid, 5-Fluoro-ADB, are summarized. For each case, a description of the terminal event, autopsy findings, cause of death, qualitative identification of 5-Fluoro-ADB and its ester hydrolysis metabolite, 5-Fluoro-ADB metabolite 7, in urine, and the quantitative values obtained in the blood specimens are outlined. Central blood concentrations ranged from 0.010 to 2.2 ng/mL for 5-Fluoro-ADB and 2.0 to 166 ng/mL for 5-Fluoro-ADB metabolite 7. Peripheral blood concentrations ranged from 0.010 to 0.77 ng/mL and 2.0 to 110 ng/mL for 5-Fluoro-ADB and 5-Fluoro-ADB metabolite 7, respectively. The majority of cases resulted in central to peripheral blood concentration ratios greater than 1 for 5-Fluoro-ADB (58%) and 5-Fluoro-ADB metabolite 7 (71%) suggesting that postmortem redistribution occurs to some extent. Combining the increased cardiac weight and/or gastric volume and toxicology data identifying 5-Fluoro-ADB, it is hypothesized that abuse of this substance may precipitate a dysrhythmia and cause sudden death.

Identification and Quantification of 5-Fluoro ADB and the 5-Fluoro ADB Ester Hydrolysis Metabolite in Postmortem Blood Samples by LC-MS/MS.

5-Fluoro ADB, also known as 5-fluoro MDMB-PINACA, is a potent synthetic cannabinoid that is an agonist to the human cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Adverse physiological and psychological effects that have resulted in hospitalization and/or death have been associated with 5-Fluoro ADB use. In addition, analytical confirmation of 5-Fluoro ADB use has been reported in both forensic human performance toxicology and postmortem cases. An analytical method for the identification and quantification of 5-fluoro ADB and the 5-fluoro ADB ester hydrolysis metabolite in human blood samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was created and validated. The linear range of this assay was determined to be 0.01-10 ng/mL for 5-fluoro ADB and 10-500 ng/mL for the 5-fluoro ADB ester hydrolysis metabolite. The method met both precision and accuracy requirements. Endogenous and exogenous interferences were not observed. Ion suppression exceeding 25% was observed for 5-fluoro ADB. However, additional experiments were performed to ensure that the observed suppression did not affect other method validation parameters such as limit of detection and accuracy. Blood samples from 36 postmortem cases were analyzed utilizing this methodology. The average blood concentration of 5-fluoro ADB was 0.29 ng/mL in central blood specimens and 0.05 ng/mL in peripheral blood specimens. The average blood concentration of the 5-fluoro ADB ester hydrolysis metabolite was 49 ng/mL in central blood specimens and 21 ng/mL in peripheral blood specimens. A serum sample was also analyzed and had a serum concentration of 0.12 ng/mL for 5-fluoro ADB and 42 ng/mL for the 5-fluoro ADB ester hydrolysis metabolite. As the concentration of the 5-fluoro ADB ester hydrolysis metabolite was found at a greater concentration than that of 5-fluoro ADB, this metabolite may be a useful marker to monitor in an attempt to confirm 5-fluoro ADB use in toxicological investigations.

LC-MS-MS vs ELISA: Validation of a Comprehensive Urine Toxicology Screen by LC-MS-MS and a Comparison of 100 Forensic Specimens.

Toxicology laboratories commonly employ immunoassay methodologies to perform an initial drug screen on urine specimens to direct confirmatory testing. Due to limitations of immunoassay testing and the need to screen for a broader range of drugs with lower limits of detection at a lower cost, mass spectrometry screening techniques have gained favor in the toxicology field. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) urine screening panel was developed and validated for 52 drugs and metabolites. A simple dilute-and-shoot with enzymatic hydrolysis technique was utilized to prepare the urine specimens for analysis. Limit of detection, interference, ionization suppression/enhancement, carryover and stability of processed specimens were assessed during validation. To evaluate the toxicological results obtained from utilizing the LC-MS-MS in comparison with the laboratory's current enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) panel, 100 authentic urine specimens from suspected driving under the influence and drug-facilitated crime cases were analyzed using both methodologies and the results were compared. In addition, the cost of each methodology was evaluated and compared. The validated LC-MS-MS method had limits of detection that were equal to or lower than the concentrations validated for ELISA cutoffs, had fewer exogenous interferences, and the cost of screening per specimen was reduced by ~70% when compared to ELISA. Comparing the toxicology results of forensic urine specimens demonstrated that by only using ELISA, the laboratory was unable to detect benzoylecgonine in 26%, lorazepam in 33% and oxymorphone in 60% of the positive specimens. Additional analytes detected using the LC-MS-MS method were zolpidem and/or metabolite, gabapentin, tramadol and metabolite, methadone and metabolite, meprobamate and phentermine. The results of the validation, the toxicological result comparison and the cost comparison showed that the LC-MS-MS screening method is a simple, sensitive and cost-effective alternative to ELISA screening methods for urine specimens.

Underestimation of substance abuse in psychiatric patients by conventional hospital screening.

UNLABELLED: Psychiatric diagnosis mainly relies on behavioral signs and symptoms. Substance abuse can mimic the clinical presentation of primary psychiatric disorders and can also complicate the management of psychiatric patients. The reliability and accuracy of urine toxicology is a vital tool in the optimal treatment of these patients. Current demographics of substance abuse suggest that in addition to the most conventional drugs of abuse (e.g. cocaine, cannabis) that are of concern to treating physicians, prescription medications and new designer drugs also should be when evaluating patients who present with symptoms of psychosis/drug addiction or altered mental status. METHODS: Urine samples from 220 psychiatric inpatients admitted to either an acute drug and alcohol unit or acute psychiatric unit were analyzed for drugs by the standard hospital assay (KIMS) and by a more sensitive ELISA and GC-MS basic drug screening protocol. RESULTS: The standard hospital toxicology (KIMS) was inferior to the ELISA and GC-MS methods in terms of both assay sensitivity and in detecting a broader number of drugs. The KIMS tests failed to identify opiates and amphetamine/methamphetamine in 50% of the patients. The KIMS screen did not identify zolpidem, buprenorphine and a number of synthetic drugs of abuse including cathinone and tryptamines. CONCLUSION: In order to reliably identify substance abuse in patients with altered mental status in inpatient settings, analytical methodologies with adequate assay sensitivity and range to detect the vast majority of commonly abused illicit drugs and prescription medications are required for optimal clinical assessment and treatment.