Effect of intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection on IVF outcomes in women with poor ovarian response: the PROVA randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection increase the number of mature oocytes obtained after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in young women with poor ovarian response (POR) undergoing IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: Intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield after COS in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: POR is frequently encountered among the infertile population and the number of women seeking infertility treatment related to POR is increasing. Effective treatment options for this patient population to conceive with autologous oocytes are lacking. Case series and cohort studies suggest that intraovarian PRP injection may improve follicular recruitment in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and POR, yet robust randomized studies have not been performed to date to determine the clinical utility of this intervention. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted at university-affiliated reproductive centers in the USA and Turkey, between January 2020 and November 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients who met inclusion criteria (<38 years old, two or more prior cycles with <3 oocytes retrieved; and without single gene disorders, prior ovarian surgery, endometriomas, BMI >35 kg/m2, or severe male factor infertility) were randomized to either the PRP or control group. Patients in both groups subsequently underwent COS, oocyte retrieval, ICSI, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and single euploid embryo transfer. Number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes obtained was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included ovarian reserve tests (antral follicle count [AFC] and anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH]), blastocyst and euploid blastocyst yields, and sustained implantation. The study was powered to detect a difference of one mature oocyte obtained at oocyte retrieval. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 83 patients met inclusion criteria and were randomized to receive autologous intraovarian PRP injection (n = 41) or to no intervention (n = 42). No significant differences were observed in number of MII oocytes retrieved per cycle (2.8 ± 2.4 vs 3.1 ± 3.3 in PRP vs control, respectively; P = 0.9), blastocysts (1.0 ± 1.3 vs 1.3 ± 2.1, P = 0.8), or euploid blastocysts (0.8 ± 1.1 vs 0.9 ± 1.6; P = 0.5). Similarly, no differences were observed in the likelihood of obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst (45% vs 37%, P = 0.4; relative risk [RR], 95% CI = 0.9, 0.6-1.2) or the rate of sustained implantation (31% vs 29%, P = 0.9; RR 1.0, 0.7-1.3). Posttreatment AFC (7.9 ± 4.5 vs 6.8 ± 4.8, P = 0.3) and AMH (0.99 ± 0.98 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.2) were also not different between the groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Results from this RCT may not be generalizable to other PRP preparations owing to heterogeneity and lack of standardization. The control groups did not undergo a sham ovarian injection, which would have been relevant had the results shown benefit of PRP injection. Only patients with POR were included in this study, and these results may not be generalizable to more severe diminution of ovarian reserve, as seen with POI. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The intraovarian PRP injection procedure does not improve mature oocyte yield or other parameters of IVF outcome in women less than 38 years old with an established IVF history of POR. The results from this study do not support the use of intraovarian PRP injection in this population. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Departmental funds were used and no external funding was requested for this study. ES is a consultant for and receives grant funding from the Foundation for Embryonic Competence. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov Registry Identifier: NCT04163640. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 15 November 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 24 February 2020.

Poor ovarian response classification systems in the clinical setting - time for an update?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Poor ovarian response (POR) remains a key challenge to the success of assisted reproductive technology. Here, we offer a comprehensive review of the two main classification systems for POR, discussing their promises and pitfalls, evaluating their performance, and exploring potential avenues for improving upon these definitions of POR. RECENT FINDINGS: The Bologna criteria represented the first meaningful attempt to create a universal POR definition. Subsequently, the POSEIDON classification system was published to provide a more nuanced view of POR, classifying patients into four groups based on age and ovarian reserve markers. A recent study evaluated the likelihood of achieving at least one euploid embryo for transfer and found that, indeed, these classification systems are effective predictors of this outcome.While these criteria provide an effective counseling tool, several limitations - not considering underlying conditions, selecting somewhat arbitrary cutoffs, and evaluating the number of oocytes retrieved regardless of maturity - highlight the importance of improving upon these systems to create a more useful tool to more accurately predict ovarian response for clinical and research purposes. SUMMARY: In the era of personalized medicine, it is time to reconsider whether diagnostic criteria for a continuous metric such as ovarian response should be based on meeting all-or-nothing thresholds for specific parameters.

Bologna vs. POSEIDON criteria as predictors of the likelihood of obtaining at least one euploid embryo in poor ovarian response: an analysis of 6,889 cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To study the likelihood of obtaining at least 1 euploid embryo for transfer in poor ovarian response (POR) diagnosed per Bologna and Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) criteria, and compare it between groups and with patients without POR. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Women undergoing an ovarian stimulation cycle with intention to pursue preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. INTERVENTIONS: Bologna criteria and the POSEIDON classification system were applied to characterize each stimulation cycle as POR or not. Cycles identified as POR by POSEIDON were subdivided into groups I, II, III, and IV as defined by this classification system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of cycles resulting in at least 1 euploid blastocyst. Other outcome measures included cycle yields (metaphase II oocytes, fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and euploid blastocysts), and euploidy rate per embryo cohort. RESULTS: A total of 6,889 cycles were included, of which 3,653 (53.0%) were classified as POR per POSEIDON criteria: 1.5% (100/6,889) in group I, 3.2% (222/6,889) in II, 11.9% (817/6,889) in III, and 36.5% (2,514/6,889) in IV. Per Bologna criteria, 23.4% (1,612/6,889) of cycles were classified as POR. Group I had similar likelihood of obtaining at least 1 euploid embryo (97.0%; 95% confidence interval, 91.5%-99.2%) as cycles not deemed POR (91.9%; 95% confidence interval, 90.9%-2.8%), whereas this decreased significantly with each subsequent POSEIDON group (II: 77.9%, 72.0%-82.9%; III: 70.5%, 67.3%-73.5%; IV: 44.8%, 42.9%-46.7%) and those meeting Bologna criteria had the lowest rates (31.9%, 29.7%-34.3%). Cycle yields correlated with ovarian reserve testing results, whereas euploidy rates were associated with age. CONCLUSIONS: Although younger POSEIDON groups (I and III) have higher euploidy rates than older groups (II and IV), each incremental POSEIDON group poses a higher risk of having no euploid blastocysts; with POSEIDON I being no different from non-POSEIDON, and Bologna having the worst prognosis. Although ovarian reserve appears to have little impact on euploidy rates, it remains a key prognostic factor for having at least 1 euploid embryo available for transfer through its impact on oocyte yield. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide the odds ratio of this outcome depending on the degree of POR.

Emerging follicular activation strategies to treat women with poor ovarian response and primary ovarian insufficiency.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Female reproductive aging remains one of the key unsolved challenges in the field of reproductive medicine. This article reviews three of the most recent and cutting-edge strategies that are currently being investigated to address the issues of poor ovarian response (POR) and primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). RECENT FINDINGS: Publications revealing the mechanism of mechanical disruption of the Hippo signaling pathway paved the way to studies on its potential application for fertility treatments. This, in combination with Akt stimulation, resulted in live births and ongoing pregnancies in women with POI. Building on previous reports on the effects of bone marrow transplants on fertility after chemotherapy, another approach involved autologous stem cell ovarian transplantation (ASCOT). The method proved effective in achieving live births in women previously diagnosed with POR. A third approach, intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma, resulted in live births and ongoing pregnancies both spontaneously and via in vitro fertilization (IVF) in women with POI and POR. SUMMARY: New paths are being charted to address the issues of POI and POR. Although these are preliminary studies that should be interpreted with caution, they represent great promise for the women affected by these conditions and the physicians treating them.

Interpretation of noninvasive prenatal testing results following in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

BACKGROUND: The positive predictive value of noninvasive prenatal testing is approximately 69% in the general population. However, positive predictive value is dependent on the prevalence of the disease in the population being tested. Patients who undergo in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and transfer a euploid embryo are presumably a lower risk population than the general population. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we explored the positive predictive value of noninvasive prenatal testing in women undergoing in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and subsequent transfer of a euploid embryo. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective cohort study. All patients who underwent in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy followed by transfer of a single euploid embryo between 2014 and 2019 at a university-affiliated fertility center were contacted. Noninvasive prenatal testing results were reviewed and those with positive noninvasive prenatal testing were identified. Results of any subsequent prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing were used to classify each positive noninvasive prenatal testing as a true positive or a false positive. The prevalence and positive predictive value of positive noninvasive prenatal testing was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1139 patients that underwent noninvasive prenatal testing after transfer of a euploid embryo were identified, 8 of which had positive noninvasive prenatal testing screens. Although 6 of these patients had subsequent definitive prenatal diagnostic testing that revealed a euploid karyotype concordant with their preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results, 1 patient opted out of diagnostic testing and later delivered a normal baby. Of note, 1 patient who had noninvasive prenatal testing positive for Turner syndrome underwent amniocentesis, which confirmed Turner mosaicism (45,X karyotype in 80% of cells). Therefore, the positive predictive value of noninvasive prenatal testing in this patient cohort was 12.5%. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and patients should recognize that patients undergoing transfer of a euploid embryo are at a relatively lower risk for fetal aneuploidy than the general population, and the positive predictive value of noninvasive prenatal testing is lower in this setting.

The impact of age beyond ploidy: outcome data from 8175 euploid single embryo transfers.

PURPOSE: The rate of embryonic aneuploidy increases with increasing female age and is the primary cause of lower pregnancy and live birth rates (LBR) in older reproductive age women. This retrospective cohort study evaluates single euploid embryo transfers to determine whether an age-related decline in reproductive efficiency persists. METHODS: A total of 8175 non-donor single embryo transfers (SET) after pre-implantation testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and cryopreservation were included. These were divided into five groups by patient age: < 35 years old (n = 3789 embryos transferred), 35-37 (n = 2200), 38-40 (n = 1624), 41-42 (n = 319), and > 42 (n = 243). Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and LBR were calculated for each group as a percentage of embryos transferred and compared. CPR was also analyzed as a percentage of implanted pregnancies, and LBR as a percentage of clinical pregnancies, to determine when age has the greatest impact. These results were then adjusted for confounding variables via a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Implantation rates negatively correlated with age. After adjusting for confounders, women 38 years or older had a significantly lower IR than those under 35 (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.73-0.99 for 38-40 years old; 0.69, 0.53-0.91 for 41-42, and 0.69, 0.51-0.94 for > 42). These differences are also apparent in CPR and LBR. The rates of progression to clinical pregnancy and live birth did not differ significantly by age group. Other factors observed to affect IR independently were anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), day of embryo transfer, and embryo morphology. CONCLUSION: While selection of euploid embryos may be effective in overcoming a significant proportion of the age-related decline in reproductive efficiency, a decrease in IR, CPR, and LBR persists even when analyzing only euploid embryo transfers. The observed impact of aging is, therefore, independent of ploidy, as well as of other variables that affect reproductive efficiency. These results indicate that factors other than aneuploidy contribute to reproductive senescence.

Uterine Cells Improved Ovarian Function in a Murine Model of Ovarian Insufficiency.

Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is defined as ovarian dysfunction in women younger than 40 years. It affects 1% of the women in this age-group and can occur iatrogenically after chemotherapy. Stem cells have been used in attempt to restore ovarian function in POI. In particular, endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) are easily obtainable in humans and have shown great potential for regenerative medicine. Here, we studied the potential for uterine cell (UC) suspensions containing eMSCs to improve ovarian function in a murine model of chemotherapy-induced POI. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled UC or phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) was delivered intravenously after chemotherapy. There was a significant increase in oocytes production and serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations after 6 weeks, as well as a 19% higher body mass in UC-treated mice. Similarly, we observed an increased number of pups in mice treated with UC than in mice treated with PBS. None of the oocytes or pups incorporated GFP, suggesting that there was no contribution of these stem cells to the oocyte pool. We conclude that treatment with UC indirectly improved ovarian function in mice with chemotherapy-induced POI. Furthermore, our study suggests that endometrial stem cell therapy may be beneficial to young women who undergo ovotoxic chemotherapy.

The association between assisted reproductive technologies and low birth weight.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine the existing literature in regards to the relationship between assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and low birth weight (LBW). RECENT FINDINGS: In 2017, Martin et al. reported on the incidence of low birth weight in relation to the number of embryos transferred, and showed that incidence of low birth weight in singletons correlates with number of embryos transferred. Meanwhile, several studies have shown increased weight of singletons born after frozen embryo transfers compared with fresh embryo transfers. A recent study published by Sekhon et al., among others, disputes these findings, and claims that frozen and fresh embryo transfers result in comparable birth weights. It is also noteworthy that Mass et al., in 2016, analyzed how birth weight as a result of assisted reproductive technologies has evolved over the years, and concluded that birth weight has not changed significantly over a long period of time. SUMMARY: Newborns conceived via assisted reproductive technologies are three times more likely to have low birth weight. Although multiple gestation and its associated prematurity are the main risk factors for low birth weight in ART-conceived pregnancies, some of the other processes specific to assisted reproduction also impact perinatal outcomes. Options, such as fresh or frozen embryo transfers, the number of embryos transferred, or endometrial preparation may all importantly affect birth weight and prematurity of ART-conceived newborns.