Timing and Outcomes After Coronary Angiography Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without Signs of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: There is broad consensus that resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should receive immediate coronary angiography (CAG); however, factors that guide patient selection and optimal timing of CAG for post-arrest patients without evidence of STEMI remain incompletely described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the timing of post-arrest CAG in actual practice, patient characteristics associated with decision to perform immediate vs. delayed CAG, and patient outcomes after CAG. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at seven U.S. academic hospitals. Resuscitated adult patients with OHCA were included if they presented between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 and received CAG during hospitalization. Emergency medical services run sheets and hospital records were analyzed. Patients without evidence of STEMI were grouped and compared based on time from arrival to CAG performance into "early" (≤ 6 h) and "delayed" (> 6 h). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-one patients were included. Median time to CAG was 18.6 h (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-94.6 h). Early catheterization was performed on 94 patients (42.5%) and delayed catheterization was performed on 127 patients (57.5%). Patients in the early group were older (61 years [IQR 55-70 years] vs. 57 years [IQR 47-65] years) and more likely to be male (79.8% vs. 59.8%). Those in the early group were more likely to have clinically significant lesions (58.5% vs. 39.4%) and receive revascularization (41.5% vs. 19.7%). Patients were more likely to die in the early group (47.9% vs. 33.1%). Among survivors, there was no significant difference in neurologic recovery at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients without evidence of STEMI who received early CAG were older and more likely to be male. This group was more likely to have intervenable lesions and receive revascularization.

Clinical factors associated with significant coronary lesions following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) afflicts >350,000 people annually in the United States. While postarrest coronary angiography (CAG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with improved survival in observational cohorts, substantial uncertainty exists regarding patient selection for postarrest CAG. We tested the hypothesis that symptoms consistent with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including chest discomfort, prior to OHCAs are associated with significant coronary lesions identified on postarrest CAG. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study among eight regional hospitals. Adult patients who experienced atraumatic OHCA with successful initial resuscitation and subsequent CAG between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. We collected data on prehospital documentation of potential ACS symptoms prior to OHCA as well as clinical factors readily available during postarrest care. The primary outcome in multivariable regression modeling was the presence of significant coronary lesions (defined as >50% stenosis of left main or >75% stenosis of other coronary arteries). RESULTS: Four-hundred patients were included. Median (interquartile range) age was 59 (51-69) years; 31% were female. At least one significant stenosis was found in 62%, of whom 71% received PCI. Clinical factors independently associated with a significant lesion included a history of myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.5, [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.3 to 32.4], p = 0.02), prearrest chest discomfort (aOR = 4.8 [95% CI = 2.1 to 11.8], p ≤ 0.001), ST-segment elevations (aOR = 3.2 [95% CI = 1.7 to 6.3], p < 0.001), and an initial shockable rhythm (aOR = 1.9 [95% CI = 1.0 to 3.4], p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among survivors of OHCA receiving CAG, history of prearrest chest discomfort was significantly and independently associated with significant coronary artery lesions on postarrest CAG. This suggests that we may be able to use prearrest symptoms to better risk stratify patients following OHCA to decide who will benefit from invasive angiography.

The magic number: Are improved outcomes observed at trauma centers with undertriage rates below 5%?

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) advises trauma centers maintain <5% undertriage rate (UTR), but provides limited rationale for this figure. We sought to determine whether patients managed at Level I/II trauma centers with a UTR less than 5% had improved outcomes compared with centers with greater than 5% UTR. We hypothesized that similar overall adjusted outcomes would be observed at trauma centers in Pennsylvania regardless of their compliance with ACSCOT undertriage recommendation. METHODS: The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database was retrospectively queried for all trauma patients managed at accredited adult Level I/II trauma centers (n = 27) from 2003 to 2015. Patients with missing data on Injury Severity Score and/or Trauma Activation Status were excluded from the analysis. Institutional UTR were calculated for all trauma centers based on ACSCOT criteria (Injury Severity Score >15; no trauma activation) and were categorized into less than 5% or greater than 5% subgroups. A multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model assessed the adjusted impact of management at centers with less than 5% undertriage. Statistical significance was set at p less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 404,315 patients from 27 trauma centers met inclusion criteria. Institutional UTRs ranged from 0% to 20.5%, with 15 centers exhibiting UTR less than 5% and 12 centers with UTR greater than 5%. No clinically meaningful difference in unadjusted mortality rate was observed between subgroups (<5% UTR: 5.19%; >5% UTR: 5.20%; p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, no difference in mortality was found for patients managed at centers with less than 5% UTR compared to those with greater than 5% UTR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.33; p = 0.608). CONCLUSION: Achieving ACSCOT less than 5% undertriage standards appears to have limited impact on institutional mortality. Further research should seek to identify new triage criteria that can be uniformly applied to all trauma centers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study, level III.

Preliminary results of a novel hay-hole fall prevention initiative.

BACKGROUND: Hay-hole falls are a prevalent source of trauma among Anabaptists-particularly Anabaptist youth. We sought to decrease hay-hole falls in South Central Pennsylvania through the development and distribution of all-weather hay-hole covers to members of the at-risk Anabaptist community. METHODS: Following the creation of a rural trauma prevention syndicate, hay-hole cover prototypes co-designed and endorsed by the Pennsylvania Amish Safety Committee were developed and distributed throughout South Central Pennsylvania. Preintervention and postintervention surveys were distributed to recipients to gain an understanding of the hay-hole fall problem in this population, to provide insight into the acceptance of the cover within the community, and to determine the efficacy of the cover in preventing falls. RESULTS: A total of 231 hay-hole covers were distributed throughout eight rural trauma-prone counties in Pennsylvania. According to preintervention survey data, 52% of cover recipients reported at least one hay-hole fall on their property, with 46% reporting multiple falls (median fall rate, 1.00 [1.00-2.00] hay-hole falls per respondent). The median self-reported distance from hay-hole to ground floor was 10.0 (8.00-12.0) feet, and the median number of hay-holes present on-property was 3.00 (2.00-4.00) per respondent. Postintervention survey data found 98% compliance with hay-hole cover installation and no subsequent reported hay-hole falls. CONCLUSION: With the support of the Pennsylvania Amish Safety Committee, we developed a well-received hay-hole cover which could effectively reduce fall trauma across other rural communities in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study, Level III.