Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 99(6): 1027-1031.e6, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316224

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A novel multisegmented esophageal fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) was designed to reduce stent migration, which is seen in up to 30% of patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the multisegmented FCSEMS. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study aimed to include 30 patients undergoing palliative stent placement. Efficacy, defined as technically successful stent placement and dysphagia scores, and safety, defined as the number of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs), were measured. RESULTS: The study was prematurely terminated due to safety concerns after including 23 patients (mean ± standard deviation age, 72 ± 10 years; 78% male). Stent placement was technically successful in 21 patients (91%), and dysphagia scores had improved in all patients with successful stent placement. SAEs were reported in 16 (70%) patients. Stent-related mortality occurred in 3 patients (13%). CONCLUSIONS: The multisegmented FCSEMS successfully treated malignant dysphagia. The study was prematurely terminated, however, because stent placement was associated with a relatively high SAE rate. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04415463.).


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Esophageal Neoplasms , Feasibility Studies , Palliative Care , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Humans , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Male , Aged , Female , Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects , Palliative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
2.
Int J Cancer ; 154(8): 1474-1483, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151749

ABSTRACT

Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We determined the yield of colonoscopy in TCS to assess its potential in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. We conducted a colonoscopy screening study among TCS in four Dutch hospitals to assess the yield of colorectal neoplasia. Neoplasia was defined as adenomas, serrated polyps (SPs), advanced adenomas (AAs: ≥10 mm diameter, high-grade dysplasia or ≥25% villous component), advanced serrated polyps (ASPs: ≥10 mm diameter or dysplasia) or CRC. Advanced neoplasia (AN) was defined as AA, ASP or CRC. Colonoscopy yield was compared to average-risk American males who underwent screening colonoscopy (n = 24,193) using a propensity score matched analysis, adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol consumption and body mass index. A total of 137 TCS underwent colonoscopy. Median age was 50 years among TCS (IQR 43-57) vs 55 years (IQR 51-62) among American controls. A total of 126 TCS were matched to 602 controls. The prevalence of AN was higher in TCS than in controls (8.7% vs 1.7%; P = .0002). Nonadvanced adenomas and SPs were detected in 45.2% of TCS vs 5.5% of controls (P < .0001). No lesions were detected in 46.0% of TCS vs 92.9% of controls (P < .0001). TCS treated with platinum-based chemotherapy have a higher prevalence of neoplasia and AN than matched controls. These results support our hypothesis that platinum-based chemotherapy increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia in TCS. Cost-effectiveness studies are warranted to ascertain the threshold of AN prevalence that justifies the recommendation of colonoscopy for TCS.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Cancer Survivors , Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal , Testicular Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prevalence , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenoma/pathology , Risk Factors
3.
Endoscopy ; 54(12): 1139-1146, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35483885

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Duodenal stent placement is a palliative option for management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). In the last 20 years, management of gastrointestinal cancers has considerably changed. It is unknown if these changes have affected clinical outcome of duodenal stent placement. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary referral center. Patients who underwent duodenal stent placement for GOO-symptoms due to a malignant stricture were included. Primary outcome was GOO-symptom free survival. Secondary outcomes included stent-related adverse event rates. Potential explanatory parameters such as period of stent placement (1998-2009 vs 2010-2019), prior treatments, peritoneal deposits, and stricture length were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients (62 % male; median age 64 years) were included. After a median of 28 days after stent placement, 82 patients (57 %) had recurrent GOO-symptoms. GOO-symptom free survival was significantly lower in 2010-2019 (P < 0.01). Time period was the only independent predictor for reduced GOO-symptom free survival (HR 1.76, P < 0.01). Stent-related adverse event rates increased over time (1998-2009: 31 % vs 2010-2019: 37 %). Prior treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse events (OR 2.53, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcome of duodenal stent placement did not improve over time. The decreased GOO-symptom free survival and increased adverse event rate in more recent years are probably related to the chemo- and/or radiotherapy treatment provided prior to duodenal stent placement.


Subject(s)
Gastric Outlet Obstruction , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Stomach Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Constriction, Pathologic/complications , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/etiology , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/surgery , Palliative Care , Retrospective Studies , Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects , Stomach Neoplasms/complications , Treatment Outcome , Aged
5.
J Clin Med ; 8(7)2019 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31261776

ABSTRACT

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most common causes of cancer related mortality. It has been speculated that hypercoagulation in cancer patients is triggered by direct or indirect contact of platelets with tumor cells, however the underlying molecular mechanisms involved are currently unknown. Unraveling these mechanisms may provide potential avenues for preventing platelet-tumor cell aggregation. Here, we investigated the role of protein tyrosine phosphatases in the functionality of platelets in both healthy individuals and patients with gastrointestinal cancer, and determined their use as a target to inhibit platelet hyperactivity. This is the first study to demonstrate that platelet agonists selectively activate low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase (LMWPTP) and PTP1B, resulting in activation of Src, a tyrosine kinase known to contribute to several platelet functions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these phosphatases are a target for 3-bromopyruvate (3-BP), a lactic acid analog currently investigated for its use in the treatment of various metabolic tumors. Our data indicate that 3-BP reduces Src activity, platelet aggregation, expression of platelet activation makers and platelet-tumor cell interaction. Thus, in addition to its anti-carcinogenic effects, 3-BP may also be effective in preventing platelet-tumor cell aggregationin cancer patients and therefore may reduce cancer mortality by limiting VTE in patients.

6.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 90(6): 972-979, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31265819

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To further optimize endoscopic stent placement, an esophageal fully covered self-expandable metal stent with a through-the-scope (TTS) delivery system was designed, providing direct endoscopic control during stent placement. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a TTS stent approach for palliation of malignant dysphagia. METHODS: This multicenter prospective feasibility study included patients with malignant dysphagia undergoing stent placement. The primary outcome was technical success of TTS stent placement. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome, adverse events, and survival. Patients were prospectively evaluated at days 14 and 28, and monthly thereafter, until death or stent removal. RESULTS: In total, 33 stents were placed in 32 patients. TTS stent placement was feasible in 30 (91%) procedures. In the other 3 procedures (9%), no large-channel endoscope could be introduced because of patient discomfort. In 10 (33%) TTS procedures, technical success was achieved because no fluoroscopy and/or guidewire was used, whereas in 20 (67%) TTS procedures, placement was supported by a guidewire (n = 9), or fluoroscopy and a guidewire (n = 11). After 2 weeks, dysphagia scores had improved in 24 (86%) patients. Median dysphagia-free time was 32 days (interquartile range [IQR], 17-76 days). In 20 (63%) patients, 29 serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred. Recurrent dysphagia occurred in 13 (41%) patients due to migration (n = 5), tissue overgrowth (n = 4), and stent deformation (n = 4). Other SAEs included significant retrosternal pain (n = 4), hemorrhage (n = 2), and esophageal perforation (n = 1). No patient died from a stent-related cause. Median survival was 42 days (IQR, 28-91 days). CONCLUSION: Placement of an esophageal TTS stent was feasible in most of the patients with malignant dysphagia. However, stent placement was associated with a relatively high adverse event rate, and in more than one-third of patients, stent placement still required fluoroscopy, which limited optimal benefit of the TTS approach. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03269903.).


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/surgery , Palliative Care/methods , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Aged , Cohort Studies , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Esophagoscopy , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
7.
Endoscopy ; 51(1): 18-29, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are effective for improving dysphagia in patients with incurable esophageal cancer but are also associated with recurrent dysphagia and adverse events. In the past decades, new SEMSs have been introduced, but also patients' risk profiles have altered. It is unknown if these changes have affected SEMS outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. Patients who underwent palliative esophageal SEMS placement for malignant dysphagia between 1994 and 2017 were included. The primary outcome was to assess shifts over time with respect to recurrent dysphagia and adverse events after SEMS placement. RESULTS: 997 patients who underwent SEMS placement were included. Recurrent dysphagia occurred in 309 patients (31 %) and remained stable, although with a trend towards an increase over time (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02 per 1-year increase; P = 0.05). Migration rate significantly increased over time (HR 1.04 per 1-year increase; P = 0.01). SEMS-related complications occurred in 461 patients (46.2 %), with 207 (20.7 %) major and 336 (33.7 %) minor complications. Prior chemoradiotherapy was significantly associated with major complications (HR 1.69; P < 0.001). Pain was the most common adverse event and showed a significant increase over time (P < 0.01). Factors associated with pain were prior chemoradiotherapy, absence of a fistula, axial and radial forces, and squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the introduction of novel esophageal SEMS designs, recurrent dysphagia has not declined over the years. Stent-related complications have increased in recent years, which seems to be mainly associated with more frequent use of chemoradiotherapy prior to SEMS placement.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagoscopy , Prosthesis Failure/etiology , Prosthesis Implantation , Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Esophageal Stenosis/physiopathology , Esophageal Stenosis/surgery , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/instrumentation , Esophagoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Netherlands , Palliative Care/methods , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Recurrence , Risk Factors
8.
Endoscopy ; 50(10): 961-971, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29895072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Covered esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are currently used for palliation of malignant dysphagia. The optimal extent of the covering to prevent recurrent obstruction is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to compare fully covered (FC) versus partially covered (PC) SEMSs in patients with incurable malignant esophageal stenosis. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 98 incurable patients with dysphagia caused by a malignant stricture of the esophagus or cardia were randomized 1:1 to an FC-SEMS or PC-SEMS. The primary outcome was recurrent obstruction after endoscopic SEMS placement. Secondary outcomes were technical and clinical success, adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients were followed until 6 months after SEMS placement or to SEMS removal, second SEMS insertion, or death, whichever came first. RESULTS: Recurrent obstruction after SEMS placement was similar for both types of stents: 19 % for FC-SEMSs and 22 % for PC-SEMSs (P = 0.65). The times to recurrent obstruction did not differ. The frequency of adverse events was similar between the two groups, with major adverse events occurring in 38 % and 47 % of patients for FC-SEMSs and PC-SEMSs, respectively (P = 0.34). No significant differences were seen in technical success, improvement of dysphagia, and HRQoL. Proximal esophageal stenosis and female sex were independently associated with recurrent obstruction and/or major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal FC-SEMSs did not reveal a lower recurrent obstruction rate compared with PC-SEMSs in the palliative management of malignant dysphagia.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care , Prosthesis Failure , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
9.
Endosc Int Open ; 4(8): E890-4, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27540579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Studies of esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) mainly focus on efficacy and recurrent dysphagia. Retrosternal pain has been described in up to 14 % of these patients, however, prospective daily pain assessment has not yet been performed. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the occurrence and management of pain after esophageal SEMS deployment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 65 patients who underwent SEMS placement for incurable malignant esophageal stenosis were included. Patients used a diary to record intensity of pain twice daily for 2 weeks, according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). A pain score ≥ 4 was used to determine whether patients experienced significant pain. If pain occurred, acetaminophen was used and, in cases of ongoing pain, an opiate was prescribed. Dose, duration, and kind of analgesic were noted. RESULTS: The rate of significant pain increased from 0 % at baseline to 60 % on Day 1 (P < 0.001), followed by 37 % and 25 % on Days 7 and 14, respectively. The rate of analgesics use increased from 20 % at baseline to 78 % on Day 1 (P < 0.001), followed by 72 % and 62 % on Days 7 and 14, respectively. The use of opiates increased from 14 % at baseline to 42 % on Day 1 (P < 0.001). No variables associated with SEMS related pain were found. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of patients experience significant pain after esophageal SEMS insertion and analgesics, including opiates, are frequently required. Patients need to be informed and preventive prescription of analgesia should be considered in order to improve quality of life.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...