Male cryptoglandular fistula surgery outcomes: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate cryptoglandular fistula surgery outcomes in men with common types of fistulae. METHOD: A database review identified study patients. Exclusion criteria included history of previous fistula, previous anorectal surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, pelvic radiation, complex fistula, age <21 years, and absence of follow-up. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five patients met criteria for review. Mean follow-up was 5.8 years. Concurrent abscess at presentation was strongly associated with poorer outcomes. New-onset seepage is more common with seton treatment (P = 0.01), but seepage resolution occurred less commonly with fistulotomy (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although both treatments are highly successful, men treated with primary fistulotomy are more likely to heal than seton patients. Fistulotomy patients have less early postoperative seepage than seton patients, but when this is present it is less likely to resolve. Presentation with concurrent abscess is strongly associated with poorer outcomes.

The Delorme repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess our colorectal surgical training program experience with the Delorme procedure for complete rectal prolapse. METHODS: Consecutive patients were identified from a surgical database and evaluated by chart review. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients with a mean follow-up period of 3.6 years were included. Outcomes included a recurrence rate of 14.5%, an overall complication rate of 25%, and a surgical site-specific complication rate of 8%. For patients younger than 50 years old (mean age, 36 y; range, 19-49 y), the recurrence rate was 8% with a mean follow-up period of 4.1 years. Their total complication rate was 15%, with no surgery site-specific complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with previously published experiences in that most preoperative evacuatory symptoms resolve with repair of the prolapse, and serious complications are uncommon. The observation that recurrence and complication rates may be lower in younger medically fit patients suggests the Delorme repair need not be restricted specifically to older, medically unfit patients.

Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work.

PURPOSE: Previous studies identified reduction in pain and complications with stapled hemorrhoidopexy relative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Previously, the presence of resected squamous epithelium and a staple line height <20 mm above the dentate line were predictive of postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to further investigate and refine the role of staple height in the prediction of postoperative outcomes. METHODS: From July 2002 to October 2004, 75 patients with symptomatic Grade 3 and 4 mixed hemorrhoids underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy in two teaching institutions with prospective data collection. All procedures were performed under the direct supervision of two colorectal teaching staff. The majority were performed under monitored anesthesia care as outpatient procedures. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative patient characteristics were evaluated. This included demographics, staple line height, specimen histology, complications, days to return to work, duration of narcotic pain medicine, and preoperative/postoperative tone and seepage. The results were subjected to statistical analysis using t-test and ANOVA. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with a median age of 49 (range, 25-87) years were identified. Histology identified 62 specimens with columnar and/or transitional cells, 10 with squamous epithelium, and 3 with muscle present. Overall complication rate was 14 percent. Complications included three readmissions for pain control, three acute postoperative anal fissures, two postoperative bleeds (with one requiring examination under anesthesia without intervention), one patient with subcutaneous emphysema, and one admission for fecal impaction. Staple line height was not a statistically significant predictor of postoperative complication. Median return to work was 14 (range, 1-31) days. Median duration of narcotic use was six (range, 0-40) days. Patients with a staple line height>22 mm required a significantly shorter duration of narcotic pain management (P=0.024). Median follow-up was 24 (range, 9-253) days. Staple line heights below 20 mm had a mean return to work of 15 days. A staple line height>20 mm had a mean return to work of nine days. Staple line height was inversely related to return to work (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A hemorrhoidopexy staple line>or=22 mm above the dentate line correlates with a significantly shorter need for postoperative narcotics (P=0.024) and an earlier return to work (P=0.017). Staple line distance above the dentate line meaningfully impacts comfort-based outcomes.

Chronic anal fissure: 1994 and a decade later--are we doing better?

BACKGROUND: Debate exists regarding whether the use of topical agents and Botox injections are as efficacious as sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to assess changes in management and outcomes of chronic anal fissure care in a community based colorectal practice between the individual years 1994 and 2003. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients in 1994 underwent lateral partial internal sphincterotomy and had a 100% healing rate. Thirty-nine patients were treated in 2003, with 32 undergoing Botox injection and 7 undergoing sphincterotomy initially. Of the Botox patients, 35% had recurrence, and 7 subsequently required sphincterotomy. Ultimate healing rates in 2003 were 97%. Time to heal was markedly prolonged in 2003 compared with 1994. Complication rates were similar, and there was no lifestyle-altering incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Our review documents a significant change in the community approach to chronic fissure management. The addition of multiple treatment modalities prolongs time to healing from initial evaluation, but they allowed 72% of patients to avoid the need for permanent sphincter division while maintaining ultimate rates of healing.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the complicated patient.

BACKGROUND: Major comorbidities are recognized risk factors in colorectal surgery. We examine here the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LC) in the complicated, high-risk patient. METHODS: From July 2003 to October 2004, 107 consecutive patients undergoing LC were prospectively studied. Complicated patients were defined as age >80 years, body mass index (BMI) >30, and/or American Society of Anesthesiology level III or IV. A group of case-matched controls undergoing open surgery (OC) during a similar time period were retrospectively reviewed. The 2 groups were compared and assessed for major and minor morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Overall morbidity was higher in the OC group 52% versus 26%. Minor complications compared at 31% OC versus 9% LC and major at 21% and 17%, respectively. With LC, advancement to discharge was more rapid and discharge home more likely than to a care facility. CONCLUSION: With proper patient selection and laparoscopic experience, LC can be performed in the complicated patient without undue morbidity and mortality.

Safety and outcome of use of nonabsorbable mesh for repair of fascial defects in the presence of open bowel.

PURPOSE: Historically, there has been reluctance to use nonabsorbable synthetic mesh for repair of abdominal-wall defects in an operative field in which the presence of open bowel is accompanied by the potential for contamination. Some believe the risk of wound infection and mesh removal in this setting to be unacceptably high. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nonabsorbable mesh used for hernia repair in the presence of a stoma or at the time of colon resection. METHODS: All patients undergoing elective surgical implantation of mesh with concomitant open bowel from 1987 to 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Computer database identified all patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair, ventral hernia repair with a stoma present, hernia repair with concomitant bowel resection, and colostomy closure with repair of hernia. No patients so identified were excluded. Follow-up was attained on all patients by chart review and telephone survey. The data was statistically analyzed by chi-squared test using a P value of <0.05 for statistical significance. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were identified as having undergone 30 elective hernia repairs using nonabsorbable mesh. The repairs were performed in the presence of a stoma or in conjunction with bowel resection. All patients received bowel preparation. Included were 11 patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair (37 percent), 14 patients undergoing ventral hernia repair in the setting of open bowel (47 percent), and 5 patients in whom mesh repair of ventral and parastomal hernias were performed simultaneously (16 percent). Hernias recurred in 13 patients (43 percent). Overall recurrence for mesh repair at a parastomal site was 63 percent; overall recurrence at an incisional hernia site was 21 percent. The risk of wound complications after mesh placement in the setting of open bowel was assessed. Wound seromas developed after surgery in four patients (13 percent). Seromas were all treated successfully by aspiration. Wound infections occurred after surgery in two patients (7 percent). Wound infection occurred exclusively in sites of parastomal repair representing 2 of 16 (13 percent) of parastomal hernia sites. Infection with fistula necessitated mesh removal in one of these two cases. No chronic sinuses were observed. Incidences of recurrence and wound infection were statistically independent of type of hernia, variety of mesh, or operative approach. CONCLUSION: After bowel preparation, nonabsorbable mesh can be used for elective repair of incisional hernia in the presence of open bowel with an expectation of minor morbidity, minimal risk of infection, and an acceptable rate of recurrence. Nonabsorbable mesh can be used for elective repair of parastomal hernia in a similar setting with a low risk of infection independent of surgical approach. Although safe, local mesh repair of parastomal hernia was, in this study, accompanied by a high rate of recurrence.