Plausible self-reported dietary intakes in a residential facility are not necessarily reliable.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Comparing reported energy intakes with estimated energy requirements as multiples of basal metabolic rate (Ein:BMR) is an established method of identifying implausible food intake records. The present study aimed to examine the validity of self-reported food intakes believed to be plausible. SUBJECTS/METHODS: One hundred and eighty men and women were provided with all food and beverages for two consecutive days in a residential laboratory setting. Subjects self-reported their food and beverage intakes using the weighed food diary method (WDR). Investigators covertly measured subjects' actual consumption over the same period. Subjects also reported intakes over four consecutive days at home. BMR was measured by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Average reported energy intakes were significantly lower than actual intakes (11.2 and 11.8 MJ/d, respectively, P<0.001). Two-thirds (121) of the WDR were under-reported to varying degrees. Only five of these were considered as implausible using an Ein:BMR cut-off value of 1.03*BMR. Under-reporting of food and beverage intakes, as measured by the difference between reported and actual intake, was evident at all levels of Ein;BMR. Reported energy intakes were lower still (10.2 MJ/d) while subjects were at home. CONCLUSIONS: Under-recording of self-reported food intake records was extensive but very few under-reported food intake records were identified as implausible using energy intake to BMR ratios. Under-recording was evident at all levels of energy intake.

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms: design options, device construct, patient selection and complications.

The aim of this paper was to describe the current status of endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. This is a comparative review of current device designs and implantation techniques. A literature review of all reported results of endovascular TAAA repair has also been carried out, together with a comparison of clinical outcomes achieved with endovascular TAAA repair and those achieved in current series of standard open TAAA repair. Endovascular TAAA repair has been performed with both unibody and modular devices, but modular devices currently predominate. In modular devices the aortic component provides access to the target visceral artery either through a fenestration or a cuff. Cuffs increase device profile and the length of aorta that is covered, but easily accommodate variations in deployment position and provide a good seal zone. Fenestrations do not affect device profile or add length to the device, but deployment position tolerates little deviation and the seal zone is tenuous. A covered stent is used to bridge the gap between the fenestration or cuff in the aortic component and the target visceral artery. Balloon-expandable covered stent branch extensions are delivered from the femoral approach when fenestrations are used. Self-expanding covered stents are delivered from either the brachial or femoral approach when cuffs are used, depending on the orientation of the cuff. Some groups reinforce the self-expanding covered stent with an uncovered self-expanding stent to enhance flexibility and stability. The majority of endovascular TAAA repairs have been performed in three centers, accounting for 84% of all reported cases. The treated TAAAs were Type 1 31.8%, Type 2 14.2%, Type 3 14.2% and Type 4 37.5%. Perioperative mortality is 6.9% (N. = 20), late mortality 13.6% (N. = 38), spinal cord ischemia (SCI) 14.9% (N. = 29) permanent in 6.7% (N. = 6), transient in 10.0% (N. = 9). Deterioration of renal function was reported in 9.8% (N. = 8), and required initiation of dialysis in 5.1% (N. = 5). Reintervention was required in 18 patients (20.0%) early in 8.9% and late in 11.1%. Branch occlusion developed in 3.5% (N. = 9) and stenosis in 0.85% (N. = 2). Current single-center series of open surgical TAAA repair report mortality rates of 5-16%, spinal cord ischemia rates of 3.8-15.5% and new onset dialysis between 2-16.2%. Population-based series of open surgical TAAA repair report mortality rates between 19.2-26.9%, spinal cord ischemia rates between 7.3-16.0% and new onset dialysis rates of 14.2-18.2%. Final status of SCI neurologic deficit, reintervention rates and branch occlusion or stenosis rates for open TAAA repair are inconsistently available, if at all. In conclusion, endovascular TAAA repair is an evolving technique that is developing increasing consistency in device design and implantation technique. It is effective in eliminating aneurysm flow and in preserving visceral branch perfusion. These early outcomes are better than the results achieved with open TAAA repair in population-based studies and are at least equal to the results of open TAAA repair reported from centers of focused expertise. These results support expanding the indications for endovascular TAAA repair to include standard risk patients.

Double-barrel technique for preservation of aortic arch branches during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) may involve either planned or inadvertent coverage of aortic branch vessels when stent grafts are implanted into the aortic arch. Vital branch vessels may be preserved by surgical debranching techniques or by placement of additional stents to maintain vessel patency. We report our experience with a double-barrel stent technique used to maintain aortic arch branch vessel patency during TEVAR. Seven patients underwent TEVAR using the double-barrel technique, with placement of branch stents into the innominate (n = 3), left common carotid (n = 3), and left subclavian (n = 1) arteries alongside an aortic stent graft. Gore TAG endografts were used in all cases, and either self-expanding stents (n = 6) or balloon-expandable (n = 1) stents were utilized to maintain patency of the arch branch vessels. In three cases the double-barrel stent technique was used to restore patency of an inadvertently covered left common carotid artery. Four planned cases involved endograft deployment proximally into the ascending aorta with placement of an innominate artery stent (n = 3) and coverage of the left subclavian artery with placement of a subclavian artery stent (n = 1). TEVAR using a double-barrel stent was technically successful with maintenance of branch vessel patency and absence of type I endoleak in all seven cases. One case of zone 0 endograft placement with an innominate stent was complicated by a left hemispheric stroke that was attributed to a technical problem with the carotid-carotid bypass. On follow-up of 2-18 months, all double-barrel branch stents and aortic endografts remained patent without endoleak, migration, or loss of device integrity. The double-barrel stent technique maintains aortic branch patency and provides additional stent-graft fixation length during TEVAR to treat aneurysms involving the aortic arch. Moreover, the technique uses commercially available devices and permits complete aortic arch coverage (zone 0) without a sternotomy. Although initial outcomes are encouraging, long-term durability remains unknown.

Hand foot skin reaction in cancer patients treated with the multikinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib.

BACKGROUND: This study examined clinicopathological findings and management of hand foot skin reaction (HFSR) to sorafenib and sunitinib in a dermatology referral center for cancer-related toxic effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 12 patients who developed HFSR in a 1-year period (2007). Medical records and histological specimens were investigated for clinicopathological data and results on management. RESULTS: We identified 12 patients developing HFSR on treatment with sorafenib (83%) or sunitinib (17%). Majority presented with grade 3 (75%) HFSR and a median Skindex score of 43. Biopsies in seven patients showed horizontal layers of keratinocyte necrosis, which correlated to time of drug exposure: early (<30 days from initiation) leading to stratum granulosum-spinosum alterations and late (> or =30 days) resulting in stratum corneum pathology. Treatment with topical urea singly (n = 3), plus tazarotene (n = 7), or fluorouracil (n = 2) resulted in > or =2 grade improvement in the majority of patients (58%), with five patients (42%) improving one grade (P = 0.007). Median Skindex score at follow-up was 32 (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: There are unique clinicopathological characteristics of HFSR due to the multikinase inhibitors that correlate with time of agent initiation. Treatment with topical agents having keratolytic, antiproliferative, and anti-inflammatory properties showed benefit.

Comparing different measures of energy expenditure in human subjects resident in a metabolic facility.

OBJECTIVE: To compare energy expenditure (EE) measured by doubly labeled water (DLW) with other measures, both physical and based on subjective questionnaires. DESIGN: A comparison of methods in a stratified sample of adult volunteers. SETTING: The feeding behaviour suite (FBS) at the Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen. SUBJECTS: A total of 59 subjects, stratified for age, sex and body mass index (BMI). INTERVENTIONS: EE was assessed by DLW (validated using measurements of energy balance), heart rate monitor (HRM), activity monitor (Caltrac), 24-h physical activity diary (PAD) and 7-day physical activity recall. Energy intake was assessed using covert (investigator-weighed) food intake (EI). Data were collected over a 12-day period of residence in the Rowett's FBS. RESULTS: No methods correlated highly with physical activity assessed by DLW. Physical methods correlated more closely than did subjective recording. All methods (except EI) significantly underestimated EE, estimated by DLW. There were no significant differences in association between methods and sex, age, BMI or fat-free mass. CONCLUSION: EE is difficult to measure precisely or accurately with current approaches but physical methods are slightly better than subjective accounts.

Endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) bridges the aneurysm with a large, conventional, unstented graft and restores flow to the visceral arteries through short grafts or direct sutured connections between the visceral arterial orifices and the primary conduit. The combination of retrograde visceral bypass and endovascular aneurysm exclusion substitutes an endovascular stent-graft for a standard graft, stented overlaps for sutured anastomoses, and transluminal insertion for direct aortic exposure. Compared to open surgery, the combination treatment requires less dissection, and causes less hemodynamic instability, and lower complication rates, particularly paraplegia. The multi-branched stent-graft substitutes endovascular visceral bypass through branches of the stent-graft for surgical visceral bypass through branches of a conventional extraluminal graft, which has the potential to further reduce surgical dissection, hemodynamic instability, and complication rates. We favor a modular approach in which short, axially oriented cuffs are extended into the visceral arteries, using self-expanding covered stents. In the past year, we have used this approach to implant multi-branched thoracoabdominal stent-graft in 16 patients. In our opinion, this approach will eventually assume a prominent role in the management of TAAA.

Increasing the impact of European obesity research in preparation for the European research area: a report on the 2003 European Commission Obesity Workshop.

Leading obesity researchers from across Europe assembled in Aberdeen, Scotland, in January 2003 to consider how to increase the impact of European obesity research. The workshop was funded by the European Commission and hosted by the Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen. The delegates identified the need to (i) develop a portfolio of studies that integrate genetics and mechanisms through parallel study of humans and animal models and (ii) establish major intervention studies in weight management and early life nutrition. It was recommended that these goals would be best achieved under the umbrella of a virtual European Obesity Research Institute, or Network of Excellence in Obesity Research under Framework Programme 6, that would facilitate harmonization of methodology, manage centralized standardized resources, coordinate training initiatives, workshops and working groups, and increase focus.

Structure of plaque at carotid bifurcation: high-resolution MRI with histological correlation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The composition of carotid atherosclerosis was visualized by using 3D MRI at high resolution with 200-micrometer (3) voxels. Magnetic resonance signal characteristics were correlated with plaque components, including collagenous cap, necrotic core, and calcification, to define resolution and other requirements for future clinical carotid MRI. METHODS: Twenty-one en bloc carotid endarterectomy specimens were imaged ex vivo by 3D gradient-echo MRI by using a 1.5-T clinical scanner with repetition time, echo time, and flip angle of 40 ms, 18 ms, and 20 degrees, respectively. Plaques were placed in Gd-saline and imaged in a solenoid radiofrequency coil. For quantitative tissue-specific signal analysis, techniques were developed to match tissue sections analyzed by MRI and histology. RESULTS: Three-dimensional imaging resolved complex morphological features not visualized by density- or T(2)-weighted 2D spin-echo imaging. The collagenous cap, necrotic core, and areas of focal calcification showed differing signal characteristics: mean contrast-to-noise ratio for cap versus underlying core was 20. The signal distributions for media and necrotic core overlapped but were resolvable in most specimens. The signal from thrombus was variable. CONCLUSIONS: En bloc specimens provide a useful model for studying plaque MRI. By use of isotropic submillimeter resolution, the collagenous cap and underlying necrotic core typically can be distinguished, and calcification can be identified. Thrombus displays a wide variation in signal intensity. The techniques presented could facilitate future clinicohistological correlation studies for atherosclerotic plaque MRI.

Endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

PURPOSE: We sought to assess the role of endovascular techniques in the management of perigraft flow (endoleak) after endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHOD: We performed endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 114 patients, using a variety of Gianturco Z-stent-based prostheses. Results were evaluated with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and every year after the operation. An endoleak that occurred 3 days after operation led to repeat CT scanning at 2 weeks, followed by angiography and attempted endovascular treatment. RESULTS: Endoleak was seen on the first postoperative CT scan in 21 (18%) patients and was still present at 2 weeks in 14 (12%). On the basis of angiographic localization of the inflow, the endoleak was pure type I in 3 cases, pure type II in 9, and mixed-pattern in 2. Of the 5 type I endoleaks, 3 were proximal and 2 were distal. All five resolved after endovascular implantation of additional stent-grafts, stents, and embolization coils. Although inferior mesenteric artery embolization was successful in 6 of 7 cases and lumbar embolization was successful in 4 of 7, only 1 of 11 primary type II endoleaks was shown to be resolved on CT scanning. There were no type III or type IV endoleaks (through the stent-graft). Endoleak was associated with aneurysm dilation two cases. In both cases, the aneurysm diameter stabilized after coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery. There were two secondary (delayed) endoleaks; one type I and one type II. The secondary type I endoleak and the associated aneurysm rupture were treated by use of an additional stent-graft. The secondary type II endoleak was not treated. CONCLUSIONS: Type I endoleaks represent a persistent risk of aneurysm rupture and should be treated promptly by endovascular means. Type II leaks are less dangerous and more difficult to treat, but coil embolization of feeding arteries may be warranted when leakage is associated with aneurysm enlargement.

Analysis of initial CT findings after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

PURPOSE: To determine the spectrum and frequency of specific computed tomographic (CT) findings in the acute period after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images obtained 1--3 days after endograft placement were evaluated in 88 patients. The images were analyzed for stent position, appearance of endograft components, perigraft leak, and postoperative findings including air and acute thrombus within the aneurysm and air surrounding the femoral-femoral bypass graft. Findings that could be misinterpreted as perigraft leak were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifteen (17%) of 88 patients had perigraft leak in the acute postoperative period. The bare segment of the proximal self-expanding stent covered one or both renal arteries in 54 (61%) patients. One patient had CT evidence of renovascular compromise. Postoperative air was within the aneurysmal sac in 51 (58%) patients and surrounded the femoral-femoral bypass graft in 67 (94%) of 71 patients in whom the grafts were evaluated with CT. Mottled attenuation within the aneurysmal sac was seen in 50 (57%) patients. Forty-six (52%) patients had calcifications within longstanding thrombus. In 31 (35%) patients, findings that could have been misinterpreted as perigraft leak were identified. CONCLUSION: Accurate analysis of CT findings after endovascular AAA repair requires careful review of all available CT images (preprocedural and pre- and postcontrast) and clear understanding of specific stent-graft components and placement.

An endovascular system for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: To describe a stent-graft system for endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) that preserves side branch perfusion. TECHNIQUE: The modular endograft system includes 3 components. The primary stent-graft is custom-made from conventional graft fabric and Gianturco Z-stents. Covered nitinol Smart Stents are used for the visceral and renal extensions, and the distal extension is made from a modified Zenith system. With the supine patient under general anesthesia, the components are delivered sequentially through surgically exposed femoral and right brachial arteries in an operation that requires prolonged periods of magnified high-resolution imaging. This system was first used in a 76-year-old man with a contained rupture of a supraceliac ulcer and a large abdominal aortic aneurysm ending proximally at the celiac artery. The endograft was implanted successfully, but the patient developed paraplegia on day 2; imaging documented an excluded aneurysm and excellent flow through the endograft and all prosthetic branches. DISCUSSION: Endovascular repair of TAAA appears to be feasible. If there are no serious, specific, unavoidable complications, the potential advantages are enormous.

Aortic stent-grafts in patients with renal transplants.

PURPOSE: To report the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 2 patients with pelvic renal transplants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two men with multiple comorbidities and pelvic transplant kidneys underwent endovascular AAA repair using an aortomonoiliac system with femorofemoral bypass grafting. The arterial end-to-side anastomosis in both patients was to the external iliac artery. Tapered aortomonoiliac grafts were fashioned from Gianturco Z-stents covered with Dacron graft material and implanted with the distal attachment site in the iliac system ipsilateral to the transplant kidney arterial anastomosis. The body of the stent-graft was reinforcement with a Wallstent in each case before the contralateral common iliac artery was occluded and the cross-femoral bypass constructed. Both patients recovered uneventfully from the procedure and are free of endoleak or other complications related to their aneurysm repair at 7 and 34 months. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a pelvic renal transplant in a patient undergoing endovascular AAA repair increases the complexity of procedural planning and endograft implantation, but a good outcome can be achieved.

Endovascular repair of a presumed aortoenteric fistula: late failure due to recurrent infection.

PURPOSE: To describe a case of presumed aortoduodenal fistula that was treated by endovascular implantation of a stent-graft. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 76-year-old man was transferred from another hospital where he had been treated for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage over a 2-month period. Ten years previously, he had undergone aortobifemoral bypass, the right limb of which recently thrombosed. At the time of transfer, computed tomographic scanning showed a large false aneurysm between the aorta and the duodenum. Endoscopy disclosed mucosal erosions in the fourth portion of the duodenum. Following implantation of 2 overlapping stent-grafts, the bleeding ceased and the false aneurysm disappeared. At no time did the patient have a fever. The patient initially did well, but 8 months after treatment, he presented with fever and chills. Recurrent infection had caused erosion of the aorta so that a large portion of the stent-graft was visible from the duodenum. The infected graft and stent-grafts were removed in a two-part operation, from which the patient recovered satisfactorily. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular stent-grafts may have a role to play in the management of aortoduodenal fistula, if only as a temporary measure to control bleeding.

Subclavian arteritis and pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to stent infection.

Technically uncomplicated percutaneous angioplasty and stent placement of a left subclavian artery stenosis was performed in a 56-year-old man for treatment of subclavian steal syndrome and vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Six days later the patient was readmitted with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and stigmata of septic emboli isolated to the ipsilateral hand. Nine days later he had computed tomography (CT) evidence of a contrast-enhancing phlegmon surrounding the stent. Despite clinical improvement and resolution of bacteremia on intravenous antibiotic therapy, the phlegmon progressed, and at day 21 a pseudoaneurysm was angiographically confirmed. The patient underwent surgical removal of the stented arterial segment and successful autogenous arterial reconstruction. The possible contributory factors leading to stent infection were prolonged right femoral artery access and an infected left arm venous access. Although the role of prophylactic antibiotics remains to be defined, it may be important in cases where the vascular access sheath remains in place for a prolonged period of time.

Endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients. METHODS: The elective endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysm was performed in 116 high-risk patients with either custom-made or commercial stent grafts. The routine follow-up examination included contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) before discharge, at 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. Patients with endoleak on the initial CT underwent re-evaluation at 2 weeks. Those patients with positive CT results at 2 weeks underwent endovascular treatment. RESULTS: Endovascular repair was considered feasible in 67% of the patients. The mean age was 75 years, and the mean aneurysm diameter was 6.3 cm. The American Society of Anesthesiologists grade was II in 3.4%, III in 65.5%, IV in 30.1%, and V in 0.9%. There were no conversions to open repair. Custom-made aortomonoiliac stent grafts were implanted in 77.6% of the cases, custom-made aortoaotic stent grafts in 11.2%, and commercial bifurcated stent grafts in 11.2%. The 30-day rates of mortality, major morbidity, and minor morbidity were 3.4%, 20.7%, and 12%, respectively, in the first 58 patients and 0%, 3.4%, and 3.4%, respectively, in the last 58. The late complications included five cases of stent graft kinking, two cases of femorofemoral graft occlusion, and three cases of proximal stent migration, one of which led to aneurysm rupture. At 2 weeks after repair, endoleak was present in 10.3% of the cases. All the type I (direct perigraft) endoleaks underwent successful endovascular treatment, whereas only one type II (collateral) endoleak responded to treatment. The technical success rate at 2 weeks was 86.2%, and the clinical success rate was 96.6%. The continuing success rate was 87.9%. Seventeen patients died late, unrelated deaths. CONCLUSION: Endovascular aneurysm repair is safe and effective in patients at high risk, for whom it may be the preferred method of treatment.

Aortomonoiliac endovascular grafting combined with femorofemoral bypass: an acceptable compromise or a preferred solution?

The relative merits of aortomonoiliac and bifurcated stent-graft configurations depend on the patient's arterial anatomy and clinical status. Aortomonoiliac stent-grafts are simple to make, simple to insert, and versatile. They are most useful when the iliac artery anatomy is severely distorted and the patient is old, sick, and inactive. The main problems with this approach are all consequences of femorofemoral bypass. The bifurcated stent-graft is the preferred alternative in healthy patients, because it ensures flow to both common iliac arteries, thereby eliminating the need for femorofemoral bypass. However, bifurcated stent-grafts and their delivery systems are difficult to make and difficult to deploy, especially when the iliac anatomy is distorted or emergency circumstances preclude preoperative sizing. This article addresses the advantages and disadvantages of the aortomonoiliac graft.

Pararenal aortic aneurysms: the future of open aortic aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: As endovascular stent graft repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) becomes more common, an increasing proportion of patients who undergo open operation will have juxtarenal aneurysms (JR-AAAs), which necessitate suprarenal crossclamping, suprarenal aneurysms (SR-AAAs), which necessitate renal artery reconstruction, or aneurysms with associated renal artery occlusive disease (RAOD), which necessitate repair. To determine the current results of the standard operative treatment of these patterns of pararenal aortic aneurysms, we reviewed the outcome of 257 consecutive patients who underwent operation for JR-AAAs (n = 122), SR-AAAs (n = 58), or RAOD (n = 77). METHODS: The patients with SR-AAAs and RAOD were younger (67.5 +/- 8.8 years) than were the patients with JR-AAAs (70.5 +/- 8.3 years), and more patients with RAOD were women (43% vs 21% for JR-AAAs and SR-AAAs). The patient groups were similar in the frequency of coronary artery and pulmonary disease and in most risk factors for atherosclerosis, except hypertension, which was more common in the RAOD group. Significantly more patients with RAOD had reduced renal function before surgery (51% vs 23%). Supravisceral aortic crossclamping (above the superior mesenteric artery or the celiac artery) was needed more often in patients with SR-AAAs (52% vs 39% for RAOD and 17% for JR-AAAs). Seventeen patients (7%) had undergone a prior aortic reconstruction. The most common renal reconstruction for SR-AAA was reimplantation (n = 37; 64%) or bypass grafting (n = 12; 21%) and for RAOD was transaortic renal endarterectomy (n = 71; 92%). Mean AAA diameter was 6.7 +/- 2.1 cm and was larger in the JR-AAA (7.1 +/- 2.1 cm) and SR-AAA (6.9 +/- 2.1 cm) groups as compared with the RAOD group (5.9 +/- 1.7 cm). RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 5.8% (n = 15) and was the same for all the groups. The mortality rate correlated (P <.05) with hematologic complications (bleeding) and postoperative visceral ischemia or infarction but not with aneurysm group or cardiac, pulmonary, or renal complications. Renal ischemia duration averaged 31.6 +/- 21.6 minutes and was longer in the SR-AAA group (43.6 +/- 38.9 minutes). Some postoperative renal function loss occurred in 104 patients (40.5%), of whom 18 (7.0%) required dialysis. At discharge or death, 24 patients (9.3%) still had no improvement in renal function and 11 of those patients (4.3%) remained on dialysis. Postoperative loss of renal function correlated (P <.05) with preoperative abnormal renal function and duration of renal ischemia but not with aneurysm type, crossclamp level, or type of renal reconstruction. CONCLUSION: These results showed that pararenal AAA repair can be performed safely and effectively. The outcomes for all three aneurysm types were similar, but there was an increased risk of loss of renal function when preoperative renal function was abnormal. These data provide a benchmark for expected treatment outcomes in patients with these patterns of pararenal aortic aneurysmal disease that currently can only be managed with open repair.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk patients: short- to intermediate-term results of endovascular repair.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk patients during the short to intermediate term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endovascular aneurysm repair was performed in 50 patients considered too high risk for conventional repair. Stent-grafts were inserted through surgically exposed femoral arteries with fluoroscopic guidance. The anesthetic technique was epidural in 36 patients, general in 12, and local in two. Aortouniiliac stent-grafts were inserted in 42 patients and aortoaortic in eight. RESULTS: There were no deaths and no conversions to open surgical repair. The primary success rate (complete aneurysm exclusion according to CT criteria) was 88% (44 of 50). The secondary, clinical, and continuing success rates were all 98% (49 of 50). Surgical time was 196 minutes +/- 67 (mean +/- SD), blood loss was 284 mL +/- 386, and volume of contrast material administered was 153 mL +/- 64. The time from the end of the surgery to resumption of a normal diet was 0.58 days +/- 0.56, to ambulation was 1.22 days +/- 0.77, and to discharge from the hospital was 3.63 days +/- 1.60. Wound problems accounted for the majority of complications. There were no instances of pulmonary failure, renal failure, stent-graft migration, or late leakage. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is feasible in two-thirds of high-risk patients, with a low mortality and high success rate during the short to intermediate term.